Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 66, Issue 4, pp 664–671 | Cite as

Source–Sink Relationships in Potato Plants

  • T. K. GolovkoEmail author
  • G. N. Tabalenkova


Using the method of labeled atoms, we investigated the operation of the source–sink system in potato plants grown at the northern border of the cultivation zone. The label was introduced photosynthetically by means of exposing individual leaves or the whole above-ground part of plants to air containing 14СО2 in different stages of their growth and development. It was shown that the export of assimilates from the leaves depended on their age, position on the stem, and the stage of ontogenesis. Young leaves of the lower layers became donors early and exported the products of current photosynthesis to the stems and roots maintaining their own growth with the substrates from the parental tuber. The stems attracted two times more 14С-assimilates than the roots. The leaves of the middle layers had the greatest area, exported 14С directly to the tubers, and spent up to 40% of assimilated carbon on their own needs. Apical leaves emerging by the end of the vegetation period accumulated approximately 10% of 14С-products of photosynthesis, and the rest of them were exported directly to the tubers. Exposure to a short-day length stimulated partitioning of carbon to the tubers in potato species notable for an obligate short-day response of tuberization (Solanum andigenum Juz. et Buk.), whereas reduction in the daily duration of photosynthesis suppressed accumulation of biomass of tops and tubers in commercially grown potato with a neutral response (Solanum tuberosum L.). In the course of tuber formation, respiration consumed 35% of initially assimilated 14С, which points to a high efficiency of storage of carbohydrate polymers in the form of starch. The obtained data broaden the knowledge about organization and operation of source–sink relationships and provide a basis for elaboration of the methods of governing potato plant’s source–sink system in an effort to improve productivity of this major crop.


Solanum tuberosum Solanum andigenum 14С-assimilates source–sink relationships leaves tubers ontogenesis photoperiod chemical treatment 



This work was supported by federal budgetary funds allocated for state assignment no. АААА-А17-117033010038-7.


The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.


  1. 1.
    Wardlow, I.F., Translocation and source–sink relationships, in The Biology of Crop Productivity, New York: Academic, 1980, pp. 297–339.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dwelle, R.B., Photosynthesis and photoassimilate partitioning, in Potato Physiology, New York: Academic, 1985, pp. 36–58.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kursanov, A.L., Assimilate Transport in Plants, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mokronosov, A.T., Ontogeneticheskii aspekt fotosinteza (The Ontogenetic Aspect of Photosynthesis), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mokronosov, A.T., Fotosinteticheskaya funktsiya i tselostnost' rastitel’nogo organizma (Photosynthetic Function and Integrity of a Plant Organism), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agroklimaticheskie resursy Komi ASSR (Agroclimatic Resources of the Komi ASSR), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mokronosov, A.T., Field device for photosynthetic carbon metabolism study in the physiological ecology, Ekologiya, 1972, no. 6, pp. 56–61.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moorby, J., The carbohydrate and mineral nutrient supply on the growth of potato tubers, Ann. Bot., 1970, vol. 34, pp. 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borzenkova, R.A., Movement of 14C-assimilates from the different leaf layers of potato plants: regulation of photosynthesis, Uch. Zap. Ural Gos. Univ., Ser. Biol., 1970, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 147–152.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryle, G.J.A., Cobby, J.M., and Powell, C.E., Synthetic and maintenance respiratory losses of 14CO2 in uniculm barley and maize, Ann. Bot., 1976, vol. 40, pp. 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golovko, T.K. and Tabalenkova, G.N., Utilization of assimilates in growth and respiration in Lolium multiflorum Lam. plants, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1994, vol. 41, pp. 629–634.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markarov, A.M., Golovko, T.K., and Tabalenkova, G.N., Morfofiziologiya klubneobrazuyushchikh rastenii (Morphophysiology of Tuber-Forming Plants), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2001.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Golovko, T.K., Costs of respiration in the potato tubers, Sov. Plant Physiol., 1986, vol. 32, pp. 384–390.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golovko, T.K., Respiration in the source–sink system of plants, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1998, vol. 45, pp. 542–550.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mokronosov, A.T. and Gavrilenko, V.F., Fotosintez. Fiziologo-ekologicheskie i biokhimicheskie aspekty (Photosynthesis: Physiological, Environmental, and Biochemical Aspects), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mokronosov, A.T., Tuberization and donor–acceptor associations in potato plants, in Regulyatsiya rosta i razvitiya kartofelya (Regulation of Growth and Development of Potato Plants), Moscow: Nauka, 1990, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tabalenkova, G.N., Markarov, A.M., and Golovko, T.K., The control of tuber formation in Solanum andigenum convar. Zhukovskii, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 1998, vol. 45, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biology, Komi Scientific Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesSyktyvkarRussia

Personalised recommendations