Advertisement

Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

, Volume 65, Issue 4, pp 512–517 | Cite as

Stomatal Behaviours of Aspen (Populus tremuloides) Plants in Response to Low Root Temperature in Hydroponics

  • Z. C. Chen
  • J. X. Feng
  • X. C. Wan
Research Papers
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Hydroponic-grown seedlings of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) were used to investigate how low root temperatures (5°C) affect stomatal conductance and water relations. An isohydric manner of the stomatal behaviour was found with the seedlings when their roots were subjected to the low temperature. Stomatal conductance rapidly and dramatically reduced in response to the low root temperature, while the xylem water potential did not significantly alter. Under the low root temperature, pH value of the xylem sap increased from 6.15 to 6.72 within the initial 4 h, while abscisic acid (ABA) concentration increased by the eighth hour of treatment. K+ concentration of the xylem sap significantly decreased within the 8th h and then reversed by the 24th h. The ion change was accompanied by a decrease and then an increase in the electrical conductivity, and an increase and then a decrease in the osmotic potential. The tempo of physiological responses to the low root temperature suggests that the rapid pH change of the xylem sap was the initial factor which triggered stomatal closure in low temperature-treated seedlings, and that the role of the more slowly accumulating ABA was likely to reinforce the stomatal closure. Xylem sap from the seedlings subjected low root temperature affected stomatal aperture on leaf discs when they were floated on the sap solution. The stomatal aperture correlated (P = 0.006) with the changed pattern of [K+] in the sap while the range of pH or ABA found in the xylem sap did not influence stomatal aperture of leaf discs in solution. The effect of xylem sap on stomatal aperture on leaf discs was different from on stomatal conductance in the intact seedlings. Comparison was made with previous study with the soil-grown seedlings.

Keywords

Populus tremuloides stomatal behaviour low root temperature isohydric xylem sap 

Abbreviations

ABA

abscisic acid

gs

stomatal conductance

ψw

water potential

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11183_2018_6999_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (248 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 249 KB.

References

  1. 1.
    Germino, M.J. and Wraith, J.M., Plant water relations influence carbon gain in a grass occurring along sharp gradients of soil temperature, New Phytol., 2003, vol. 157, pp. 241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryyppö, A., Iivonen, S., Rikala, R., Sutinen, M.L., and Vapaavuori, E., Response of Scots pine seedlings to low root zone temperature in spring, Physiol. Plant., 1998, vol. 102, pp. 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wan, X. and Zwiazek, J.J., Mercuric chloride effects on root water transport in aspen seedlings, Plant Physiol., 1999, vol. 121, pp. 939–946.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wan, X., Zwiazek, J.J., Lieffers, V.J., and Landhäusser, S.M., Hydraulic conductance in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings exposed to low root temperatures, Tree Physiol., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 691–696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murai-Hatano, M., Kuwagata, T., Sakurai, J., Nonami, H., Ahamed, A., Nagasuga, K., Matsunami, T., Fukushi, K., Maeshima, M., and Okada, M., Effect of low root temperature on hydraulic conductivity of rice plants and the possible role of aquaporins, Plant Cell Physiol., 2008, vol. 49, pp. 1294–1305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delucia, E.H., Effect of low root temperature on net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate concentration in Engelmenn spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) seedlings, Tree Physiol., 1986, vol. 2, pp. 143–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wan, X., Landhäusser, S.M., Zwiazek, J.J., and Lieffers, V.J., Root water flow and growth of aspen (Populus tremuloides) at low root temperatures, Tree Physiol., 1999, vol. 19, pp. 879–884.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tardieu, F. and Simonneau, T., Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours, J. Exp. Bot., 1998, vol. 49, pp. 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McDowell, N., Pockman, W.T., Allen, C.D., Breshears, D.D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D.G., and Yepez, E.A., Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol., 2008, vol. 178, pp. 719–739.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilkinson, S. and Davies, W.J., ABA-based chemical signaling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants, Plant Cell Environ., 2002, vol. 25, pp. 195–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tardieu, F., Too many partners in root–shoot signals. Does hydraulics qualify as the only signal that feeds back over time for reliable stomatal control? New Phytol., 2016, vol. 212, pp. 802–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brodribb, T.J. and McAdam, S.A.M., Evolution in the smallest valves (stomata) guides even the biggest trees, Tree Physiol., 2015, vol. 35, pp. 451–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wan, X., Landhäusser, S.M., Zwiazek, J.J., and Lieffers, V.J., Stomatal conductance and xylem sap properties of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in response to low soil temperature, Physiol. Plant., 2004, vol. 122, pp. 79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Epstein, E., Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives, London: John Wiley and Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilkinson, S. and Davies, W.J., Xylem sap pH increase: a drought signal received at the apoplastic face of the guard cell that involves the suppression of saturable abscisic acid uptake by the epidermis symplast, Plant Physiol., 1997, vol. 113, pp. 559–573.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilkinson, S., pH as a stress signal, Plant Growth Regul., 1999, vol. 29, pp. 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilkinson, S., Corlett, J.E., Oger, L., and Davies, W.J., Effects of xylem pH on transpiration from wild-type and flacca tomato leaves, Plant Physiol., 1998, vol. 117, pp. 703–709.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trejo, C.L., Davies, W.J., and Ruiz, L.P., Sensitivity of stomata to abscisic acid. An effect of the mesophyll, Plant Physiol., 1993, vol. 102, pp. 497–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trejo, C.L., Clephan, A.L., and Davies, W.J., How do stomata read abscisic acid signal? Plant Physiol., 1995, vol. 109, pp. 803–811.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tardieu, F. and Davies, W.J., Stomatal response to abscisic acid is a function of current plant water status, Plant Physiol., 1992, vol. 98, pp. 540–545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Penny, M.G. and Bowling, D.J.F., A study of potassium gradients in the epidermis of intact leaves of Commelina communis L. in relation to stomatal opening, Planta, 1974, vol. 119, pp. 17–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Villagarcia, M.R., Carter, T.E., Rufty, T.W., Niewoehner, A.S., Jennette, M.W., and Arrelano, C., Genotypic rankings for aluminium tolerance of soybean roots grown in hydroponics and sand culture, Crop Sci., 2001, vol. 41, pp. 1499–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Forestry New TechnologyChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations