Advertisement

Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences

, Volume 89, Issue 4, pp 342–350 | Cite as

Global Experience in Interaction with Compatriot Scientists: Lessons for Russia

  • M. A. YurevichEmail author
  • V. A. MalakhovEmail author
  • D. S. AushkapEmail author
Organization of Research
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Foreign experience has shown that close interaction with the national scientific diaspora is imperative to reinforce the scientific and technological potential of society. Academic studies have established specific traits of the global circulation of scientific personnel, including fruitful cooperation between emigrant scientists and the donor country. By the example of China, India, Korea, Taiwan, and Iran, this article shows the successful experience of developing a systems policy relative to national scientific diasporas. As for Russia, the state’s measures in this respect are uncoordinated and inconsistent. Proposals for widening cooperation with the Russian scientific diaspora are formulated.

Keywords:

scientific diaspora brain drain academic mobility international cooperation in science and technology scientific policy scientific personnel circulation. 

Notes

FUNDING

This article was prepared within the state assignment of the Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics, and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL) for 2018, project no. 31.12296.2018/12.1 “Study of the Structure of the Russian Scientific Diaspora and the Implementation of Mechanisms for Using Its Potential for the Development and International Communication of Russian Science.”

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    S. C. Carr, K. Inkson, and K. Thorn, “From global careers to talent flow: Reinterpreting ‘brain drain’,” J. World Bus. 40 (4), 386–398 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Jöns, “Brain circulation and transnational knowledge networks: Studying long-term effects of academic mobility to Germany, 1954–2000,” Global Networks, No. 9 (3), 315–338 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. J. Borjas and K. B. Doran, “The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians,” Quarterly J. Econ. 127 (3), 1143–1203 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Kahn and M. MacGarvie, “Do return requirements increase international knowledge diffusion? Evidence from the Fulbright program,” Res. Policy 45 (6), 1304–1322 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Head, Y. A. Li, and A. Minondo, “Geography, ties, and knowledge flows: Evidence from citations in mathematics,” HKUST IEMS Working Paper No. 2015-30 (2015). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2660041.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Agrawal and A. Goldfarb, “Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation,” Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (4), 1578–1590 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. M. Collins, “Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire,” Soc. Stud. Sci. 31 (1), 71–85 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Edler, H. Fier, and C. Grimpe, “International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer,” Res. Policy 40 (6), 791–805 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Jonkers and R. Tijssen, “Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity,” Scientometrics 77 (2), 309–333 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. MacGarvie, “The determinants of international knowledge diffusion as measured by patent citations,” Econ. Lett. 87 (1), 121–126 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Séguin, P. A. Singer, and A. S. Daar, “Scientific diasporas,” Science 312, 1602–1603 (2006). https://sig.ias.edu/files/pdfs/Scientific-Diasporas.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Yang and A. R. Welch, “Globalization, transnational academic mobility and the Chinese knowledge diaspora: An Australian case study,” Discourse: Stud. Cultural Polit. Educ. 31 (5), 593–607 (2010).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Appelt, B. van Beuzekom, F. Galindo-Rueda, and R. de Pinho, “Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists?,” in Global Mobility of Research Scientists: The Economics of Who Goes Where and Why, Ed. by A. Geuna (Academic Press, 2015), pp. 177–213.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. V. Latova and V. I. Savinkov, “The influence of academic migration on the intellectual potential of Russia,” Eur. J. Educ. 47 (1), 64–76 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. V. Markova, N. A. Shmatko, and Y. L. Katchanov, “Synchronous international scientific mobility in the space of affiliations: Evidence from Russia,” SpringerPlus 5 (1) (2016). https://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40064-016-2127-3. Cited May 10, 2018.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. J. Burns, The potential of science diasporas. http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2013/potential-science-diasporas. Cited June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. V. Sokolov, “Intellectual migration in China, India, and Russia: Several international comparisons,” Nauka. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie, No. 3, 45–63 (2016).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Marmolejo-Leyva, M. A. Perez-Angon, and J. M. Russell, “Mobility and international collaboration: Case of the Mexican scientific diaspora,” PloS one 10 (6) (2015). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126720. Cited June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Belarusian scientists abroad. http://www.scienceportal.org.by/diaspora/project/. Cited June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ya. Kechagiaras, Engaging the scientific diaspora from EaP countries. https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/events/docs/07_Yannis_Kechagiaras.pdf. Cited June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    OECD. Science, technology, and industry scoreboard 2017. http://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-scoreboard-20725345.htm. Cited June 1, 2018.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. F. Moed, M. Aisati, and A. Plume, “Studying scientific migration in Scopus,” Scientometrics 94 (3), 929–942 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. L. Dyachenko, “Internal migration of scientists in Russia and the USA: The case of physicists,” Scientometrics 113 (1), 105–122 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. G. Dezhina, E. N. Kuznetsov, A. V. Korobkov, and N. V. Vasil’ev, Developing Cooperation with the Russian-Language Scientific Diaspora: Experience, Problems, Prospects. Report no. 23/2015 (Spetskniga, Moscow, 2015) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Research work report on the subject “Methodological and Analytical Information Support for Interaction between Russia’s Ministry of Education and Science and the Scientific Diaspora” (work cipher 26.8374.2017/NM) (2017).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. B. Meyer, D. Kaplan, and J. Charum, “Scientific nomadism and the new geopolitics of knowledge,” Int. Soc. Sci. J. 53 (168), 309–321 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Docquier and A. Marfouk, “International migration by education attainment 1990–2000,” in International Migration, Remittances, and the Brain Drain (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2006), pp. 99–151.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Beechler and I. C. Woodward, “The global ‘war for talent’,” J. Int. Management 15 (3), 273–285 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Q. Chen, “Higher education transition and academic mobility in China, ” in Globalization and Transnational Academic Mobility (Springer, Singapore, 2017), pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    T. Fangmeng, “Brain circulation, diaspora, and scientific progress: A study of the international migration of Chinese scientists, 1998–2006,” Asian Pacific Migration J. 25 (3), 296–319 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Zweig, C. Changgui, and S. Rosen, “Globalization and transnational human capital: Overseas and returnee scholars to China,” China Quarterly 179, 735–757 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    OECD. Connecting with Emigrants: A Global Profile of Diasporas (OECD Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    V. A. Malakhov, M. A. Yurevich, and D. S. Aushkap, “Iran: The positive experience of S&T Development,” Mir. Ekon. Mezhdunar. Otn. 62 (11), 116–124 (2018).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    B. S. L. Yoon, “Reverse brain drain in South Korea: State-led model,” Stud. Compar. Int. Dev. 27 (1), 6–11 (1992).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. J. Lee and D. Kim, “Brain gain or brain circulation? US doctoral recipients returning to South Korea,” Higher Education 59 (5), 627–643 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    H. Song, “From brain drain to reverse brain drain: Three decades of Korean experience,” Sci., Technol., Soc. 2 (2), 320–339 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. L. Chang, “Causes of brain drain and solutions: The Taiwan experience,” Stud. Compar. Int. Dev. 27 (1), 27–43 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    A. G. Allakhverdyan, Academic Personnel Dynamics in Soviet and Russian Science: Comparative–Historical Study (Kogito-Tsentr, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    I. Dezhina, “‘Brain drain’ from post-Soviet Russia: Evolution of the phenomenon and its assessments,” Naukovedenie, No. 3, 25–56 (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Financial University under the Government of the Russian FederationMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics, and Law in Science and TechnologyMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations