Parametrized Matrix Inequalities in Analysis of Linear Dynamic Systems

  • V. V. PozdyayevEmail author


Problems that can be reduced to polynomial and parametrized linear matrix inequalities are considered. Such problems arise, for example, in control theory. Well-known methods for their solution based on a search for nonnegative polynomials scale poorly and require significant computational resources. An approach based on systematic transformations of the problem under study to a form that can be addressed with simpler methods is presented.


matrix inequalities nonconvex programming global optimization control theory 2D systems. 



The author thanks P.V. Pakshin for valuable comments.


  1. 1.
    G. Chesi, “LMI techniques for optimization over polynomials in control: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55 (11), 2500–2510 (2010).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Chesi and R. H. Middleton, “Necessary and sufficient LMI conditions for stability and performance analysis of 2-D mixed continuous-discrete-time systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 59 (4), 996–1070 (2014).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Chesi and R. H. Middleton, “ H and H2 norms of 2-D mixed continuous-discrete-time systems via rationally-dependent complex Lyapunov functions,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 60 (10), 2614–2625 (2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Rogers, K. Galkowski, and D. H. Owens, Control System Theory and Applications for Linear Repetitive Processes (Springer, Berlin, 2007).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.-S. Ahn, K. L. Moore, and Y. Q. Chen, Iterative Learning Control: Robustness and Monotonic Convergence for Interval Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2007).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. V. Pozdyayev, “Atomic optimization. Part 1: Transformation of the search space and one-dimensional problems,” Upr. Bol’shimi Sist., No. 36, 39–80 (2011).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. V. Pozdyayev, “Atomic optimization. Part 2: Multidimensional problems and polynomial matrix inequalities,” Upr. Bol’shimi Sist., No. 43, 95–123 (2013).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Posdyayev, “On evaluating H and H2 performance of uncertain systems,” Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1217–1222.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. Pozdyayev, “2D system analysis via dual problems and polynomial matrix inequalities,” Numer. Algebra Control Optim. 6 (4), 491–504 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Pozdyayev, “Necessary Conditions for 2D systems’ stability,” Preprints of the 1st IFAC Conference on Modeling, Identification, and Control of Nonlinear Systems (2015), pp. 800–805.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Studies in Applied Mathematics (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 1994).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.-B. Lasserre, “Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments,” SIAM J. Optim. 11 (3), 796–817 (2001).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Henrion and J.-B. Lasserre, “Convergent relaxations of polynomial matrix inequalities and static output feedback,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51 (2), 192–202 (2006).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. A. R. Crusius and A. Trofino, “Sufficient LMI conditions for output feedback control problems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44 (5), 1053–1057 (1999).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Chesi and R. H. Middleton, “Static feedback design for 2D mixed continuous-discrete-time systems via LMIs,” Proceedings of European Control Conference (ECC) (2015), pp. 2859–2864.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arzamas Polytechnic Institute, Branch of Alekseev Nizhny Novgorod State Technical UniversityArzamasRussia

Personalised recommendations