Advertisement

Speech and Non-Speech Sound Categorization in Auditory Cortex: fMRI Correlates

  • 1 Accesses

Abstract

We studied the functional structure of the auditory cortex by identifying and comparing the spatial localization of activation areas in response to speech and non-speech stimuli using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We also performed a similar comparison of activation zones in response to male and female voices. We found that there are specific areas for speech and non-speech auditory stimuli and overlapping areas; the speech area is significantly larger as compared with others. The activation areas responding to male and female voices overlap, though not significantly; the influence of female voice was stronger. These results suggest that there are special areas in the auditory cortex for auditory signal processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. 1

    Luriya, A.R., Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narusheniya pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga (Higher Human Cortical Functions and Their Disorders in Local Brain Lesions), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1962.

  2. 2

    Diehl, R.L., Lotto, A.J., and Holt, L.L., Speech perception, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 2004, vol. 55, p. 149.

  3. 3

    Zatorre, R.J., Belin, P., and Penhune, V.B., Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech, Trends Cognit. Sci., 2002, vol. 6, p. 37.

  4. 4

    Joanisse, M.F. and Gati, J.S., Overlapping neural regions for processing rapid temporal cues in speech and nonspeech signals, NeuroImage, 2003, vol. 19, p. 64.

  5. 5

    Tremblay, P., Baroni, M., and Hasson, U., Processing of speech and non-speech sounds in the supratemporal plane: auditory input preference does not predict sensitivity to statistical structure, NeuroImage, 2013, vol. 66, p. 318.

  6. 6

    Marie, D., Roth, M., Lacoste, R., et al., Left brain asymmetry of the planum temporale in a nonhominid primate: Redefining the origin of brain specialization for language, Cereb. Cortex, 2018, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 1808.

  7. 7

    Zheng, Z.Z., Munhall, K.G., and Johnsrude, I.S., Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one’s own voice during speech production, J. Cognit. Neurosci., 2010, vol. 22, no. 8, p. 1770.

  8. 8

    Christoffels, I.K., Formisano, E., and Schiller, N.O., Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2007, vol. 28, no. 9, p. 868.

  9. 9

    Hickok, G., Okada, K., and Serences, J.T., Area Spt in the human planum temporale supports sensory-motor integration for speech processing, J. Neurophysiol., 2008, vol. 101, no. 5, p. 2725.

  10. 10

    Zheng, Z.Z., The functional specialization of the planum temporale, J. Neurophysiol., 2009, vol. 102, no. 6, p. 3079.

  11. 11

    Griffiths, T.D. and Warren, J.D., The planum temporale as a computational hub, Trends Neurosci., 2002, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 348.

  12. 12

    Hawkins, S., Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding, J. Phonetics, 2003, vol. 31, p. 373.

  13. 13

    McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M.K., and Aslin, R.N., Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access, Cognition, 2002, vol. 86, p. B33.

  14. 14

    Mottonen, R., Calvert, G., Jaaskelainen, I., et al., Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus, NeuroImage, 2006, no. 30, p. 563.

  15. 15

    Petrides, M. and Pandya, D.N., Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey, Eur. J. Neurosci., 2002, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 291.

  16. 16

    Romanski, L.M. and Averbeck, B.B., Neural representation of vocalizations in the primate ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 2005, vol. 93, p. 734.

  17. 17

    Romanski, L.M. and Goldman-Rakic, P.S., An auditory domain in primate prefrontal cortex, Nat. Neurosci., 2002, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 15.

  18. 18

    Fecteau, S., Sensitivity to voice in human prefrontal cortex, J. Neurophysiol., 2005, vol. 94, no. 3, p. 2251.

  19. 19

    Joassin, F., Maurage, P., and Campanella, S., The neural network sustaining the crossmodal processing of human gender from faces and voices: an fMRI study, NeuroImage, 2011, vol. 54, no. 2, p. 1654.

  20. 20

    Welcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging: http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm.

  21. 21

    Friston, K.J., Holmes, A.P., Worsley, K.J., et al., Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach, Hum. Brain Mapp., 1994, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 189.

  22. 22

    Wilke, M. and Schmithorst, V.J., A combined bootstrap/histogram analysis approach for computing a lateralization index from neuroimaging data, NeuroImage, 2006, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 522.

  23. 23

    Wilke, M. and Lidzba, K., LI-tool: a new toolbox to assess lateralization in functional MR-data, J. Neurosci. Methods, 2007, vol. 163, no. 1, p. 128.

  24. 24

    Chan, A., Dykstra, A., Jayaram, V., et al., Speech-specific tuning of neurons in human superior temporal gyrus, Cereb. Cortex, 2014, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 2679.

  25. 25

    Fan, C.S.D., Zhu, X., Dosch, H.G., et al., Language related differences of the sustained response evoked by natural speech sounds, PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, no. 7, p. e0180441.

  26. 26

    Wernicke, C., The symptom complex of aphasia, Proc. Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966/1968, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1969, vol. 4, p. 34.

  27. 27

    Luria, A.R., Traumatic Aphasia, Hague: Mouton, 1970.

  28. 28

    Andermann, M., Patterson, R.D., Vogt, C., et al., Neuromagnetic correlates of voice pitch, vowel type, and speaker size in auditory cortex, NeuroImage, 2017, vol. 158, p. 79.

  29. 29

    Bonte, M., Hausfeld, L., Scharke, W., et al., Task-dependent decoding of speaker and vowel identity from auditory cortical response patterns, J. Neurosci., 2014, vol. 34, no. 13, p. 4548.

  30. 30

    Formisano, E., De Martino, F., Bonte, M., and Goebel, R., “Who” is saying “what”? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech, Science, 2008, vol. 322, no. 5903, p. 970.

  31. 31

    Liu, P., Cole, P., Gilmore, R., et al., Young children’s neural processing of their mother’s voice: an fMRI study, Neuropsychologia, 2019, vol. 122, p. 11.

  32. 32

    Gardumi, A., Ivanov, D., Havlicek, M., et al., Tonotopic maps in human auditory cortex using arterial spin labeling, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2017, vol. 38, no. 3, p. 1140.

  33. 33

    Bonte, M., Ley, A., Scharke, W., and Formisano, E., Developmental refinement of cortical systems for speech and voice processing, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 128, p. 373.

  34. 34

    Simon, J.Z., The encoding of auditory objects in auditory cortex: Insights from magnetoencephalography, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2015, vol. 95, no. 2, p. 184.

  35. 35

    Markiewicz, C.J. and Bohland, J.W., Mapping the cortical representation of speech sounds in a syllable repetition task, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 141, p. 174.

  36. 36

    Bethmann, A. and Brechmann, A., On the definition and interpretation of voice selective activation in the temporal cortex, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2014, vol. 8, p. 499.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the staff of the Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation for their help in collecting the stimulus material.

Author information

Correspondence to S. A. Varlamov or L. A. Mayorova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no explicit and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics set out in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 and its subsequent updates, and approved by the local bioethical committees of the Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation and the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). Each study participant provided voluntary written informed consent signed by them after his explanations potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the forthcoming investigations.

Additional information

Translated by M. Batrukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shklovsky, V.M., Varlamov, S.A., Petrushevsky, A.G. et al. Speech and Non-Speech Sound Categorization in Auditory Cortex: fMRI Correlates. Hum Physiol 45, 577–586 (2019) doi:10.1134/S0362119719060124

Download citation

Keywords:

  • speech perception
  • superior temporal cortex
  • fMRI
  • planum temporale