Advertisement

Human Physiology

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 552–556 | Cite as

Hidden Nodes of the Brain Systems

  • S. V. Medvedev
  • A. D. Korotkov
  • M. V. KireevEmail author
DISCUSSIONS
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The functional organization of the brain systems underlying higher order human activity is one of the key issues of modern psychophysiology and neurophysiology. Despite the continuous development of new methods, the relationships between the activity of individual cells (and their groups) and the activity of large brain areas observed by means of functional tomography are not yet fully understood. In this paper, we propose a solution for this problem basing on the common patterns of the principles of functional brain activity at the micro- (cells) and macro- (brain areas) levels. We compared the previously identified principles of the dynamic organization of the multicellular neuronal activity of the human brain with the recent fMRI findings basing on the combined analysis of local characteristics of energy consumption by the brain structures and their distant interactions. As a result, we assumed that many brain systems are composed of a large number of hidden nodes. Those nodes are included in the systems in certain periods only. For a wide range of activities, the brain regions are systematically involved in the actively working brain systems as hidden nodes, i.e., without changing their energy consumption, which was observed at both micro- and macro-levels of functional brain activity. These findings reflect the new phenomenon of the “hidden nodes” of the brain systems.

Keywords:

organization of brain systems functional MRI psychophysiological interactions 

Notes

FUNDING

The studies of the brain systems that ensure the speech activity (generation and perception of words and perception of grammatical agreement) and conscious false actions were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project nos. 16-18-00041 and 16-18-00040, respectively). The study of the brain provision of action preparation was performed under the State Assignment of the Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg) (theme I.43 “Fundamentals of the Technology of Physiological Adaptations”).

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no explicit and potential conflicts of interest associated with the publication of this article.

Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All studies were conducted in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics, which were set out in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 and its subsequent updates, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg). Each study participant provided a voluntary written informed consent signed after explanation of potential risks and benefits as well as the nature of the forthcoming research.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Friston, K.J., Functional and effective connectivity, Brain Connectivity, 2011, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fornito, A., Zalesky, A., and Bullmore, E., Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bekhterev, V.M., Provodyashchie puti spinnogo i golovnogo mozga (Conductive Paths of the Spinal Cord and Brain), St. Petersburg: Tipogr, vol. Bezobrazova, 1896.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azevedo, F.A., Carvalho, L.R., Grinberg, L.T., et al., Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain, J. Comp. Neurol., 2009, vol. 513, no. 5, p. 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bekhtereva, N.P., Analysis of the neurophysiological principles of mental phenomena in humans, in Glubokie struktury mozga cheloveka v norme i patologii (Deep Human Brain Structure in Normal and Pathological States), Moscow: Nauka, 1966, p. 18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bechtereva, N.P., Neirofiziologicheskie aspekty psi-kh-icheskoi deyatel’nosti cheloveka (Neurophysiological Aspects of Mental Human Activity), Leningrad: Meditsina, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kogan, A.B. and Chorayan, O.G., Veroyatnostnye mekhanizmy nervnoi deyatel’nosti (Probabilistic Mechanisms of Nervous Activity), Rostov-on-Don: Rostovsk. Gos. Univ., 1980.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gogolitsyn, Yu.L., Komponentnyi analiz impul’snoi aktivnosti neironov (Component Analysis of Pulse Activity of Neurons), Leningrad: Nauka, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krol’, E.M. and Medvedev, S.V., Connections between distantly located neural brain populations, Fiziol. Chel., 1982, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 667.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerstein, G.L. and Perkel, D.H., Mutual temporal relationships among neuronal spike trains, Biophys. J., 1972, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerstein, G.L. and Kirkland, K.L., Neural assemblies: technical issues, analysis, and modeling, Neural Network, 2001, vol. 14, nos. 6–7, p. 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medvedev, S.V., Neurophysiological correlates of system formation in mental activity, Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Leningrad, 1987.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Medvedev, S.V. and Pakhomov, S.V., Dinamicheskaya organizatsiya mozgovykh sistem (Dynamic Organization of Brain Systems), Leningrad: Nauka, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chawla, D., Lumer, E.D., and Friston, K.J., Relating macroscopic measures of brain activity to fast, dynamic neuronal interactions, Neural Comput., 2000, vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kireev, M.V., Zakhs, D.V., Korotkov, A.D., et al., Contemporary methods for functional tomographic neuroimaging in studies of brain functions in health and pathology, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol., 2014, vol. 44, no. 9, p. 982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Friston, K.J., Buechel, C., Fink, G.R., et al., Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging, NeuroImage, 1997, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerchen, M.F., Bernal-Casas, D., and Kirsch, P., Analyzing task dependent brain network changes by whole-brain psychophysiological interactions: a comparison to conventional analysis, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2014, vol. 35, no. 10, p. 5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerchen, M.F. and Kirsch, P., Combining task-related activation and connectivity analysis of fMRI data reveals complex modulation of brain networks, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2017, vol. 38, no. 11, p. 5726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kireev, M., Slioussar, N., and Korotkov, A.D., Changes in functional connectivity within the fronto-temporal brain network induced by regular and irregular Russian verb production, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2015, vol. 9, p. 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andric, M., Goldin-Meadow, S., Small, S.L., et al., Repeated movie viewings produce similar local activity patterns but different network configurations, NeuroImage, 2016, vol. 142, p. 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kireev, M.V., Korotkov, A.D., Masharipov, R.S., and Medvedev, S.V., Specific system organization of the brain systems involved in the action training, Zdorov. Obraz. XXI Veke, 2018, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kireev, M.V., Systemic organization of brain activity to ensure particular behavior, Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, St. Petersburg, 2017.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kireev, M., Korotkov, A., Medvedeva, N., et al., Deceptive but not honest manipulative actions are associated with increased interaction between middle and inferior frontal gyri, Front. Neurosci., 2017, vol. 11, p. 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Medvedev, S.V., Kireev, M.V., and Korotkov, A.D., Organization of the brain systems of aim-directed behavior: new data, Hum. Physiol., 2018, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kireev, M., Korotkov, A., Medvedeva, N., and Medvedev, S., Possible role of an error detection mechanism in brain processing of deception: PET-FMRI study, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2013, vol. 90, p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Slioussar, N., Kireev, M., Chernigovskaya, T.V., et al., An ER-fMRI study of Russian inflectional morphology, Brain Lang., 2014, vol. 130, p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kireev, M.V., Slioussar, N.A., Chernigovskaya T.V., and Medvedev, S.V., Organization of functional interactions within the fronto-temporal language brain system underlying production and perception of regular and irregular Russian verbs, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2018, vol. 131, p. S13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Slioussar, N.A., Kireev, M.V., and Medvedev, S.V., Differential involvement of prefrontal cortex in the processing of case agreement attraction in Russian: an FMRI study, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 2018, vol. 131, p. S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Di, X. and Biswal, B.B., Examining whole-brain task modulated connectivity in different task domains, Cereb. Cortex, 2018, vol. 29, no. 4, p. 1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Medvedev
    • 1
  • A. D. Korotkov
    • 1
  • M. V. Kireev
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations