Advertisement

Thermal Engineering

, Volume 66, Issue 10, pp 730–736 | Cite as

Analysis of Additional Factors in Determining the Failure Rate of Heat Network Pipelines

  • I. G. AkhmetovaEmail author
  • T. R. Akhmetov
DISTRICT HEATING COGENERATION AND HEAT NETWORKS
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

For estimating the reliability of existing and newly developed circuit diagrams of heat networks, a special procedure is applied. By applying this procedure, which uses such input data as the length and operation time of pipeline segments, it is possible to determine the availability factors and probabilities of failure-free operation for a heat network. The aims of this study are to reveal and consider additional factors in determining the failure rate of heat network pipelines and to develop a new procedure for calculating indicators characterizing the reliability of heat supply to consumers. The failure rate of heat network elements depends, apart from the time they have been in operation, on the pipeline wall residual thickness, corrosion activity of soil, pipeline material, failure of a pipeline batch, other (previous) bursts in the considered segment, conduit flooding (flooding traces), and intersections with other utility lines. Additional factors significantly influencing the heat supply reliability, which, however, have not been included in the currently used procedure, are revealed, and an algorithm for calculating the heat network reliability is developed. The influence of the additional factors on the reliability of heat network operation is evaluated proceeding from the field data presented by regional heat supply companies. The influence of additional factors is taken into account in elaborating the new procedure and algorithm for calculating the heat supply’s reliability indicators. The results from numerical and experimental investigations confirmed the possibility of using the obtained functional dependencies for elaborating a procedure of calculating heat network’s reliability taking external factors into account.

Keywords:

heat supply heat networks reliability failure rate soil corrosiveness conduit flooding pipeline wall residual thickness additional factors' accounting coefficient 

Notes

FUNDING

This research work was supported by the Russian Federation Ministry for Education and Science grant on basic scientific research (agreement no. 13.6994.2017/BCh).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    RF Federal Law of 27.07.2010 No. 190-FZ “On Heat Supply”. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    RF Ministry of Regional Development Order of 26.07.2013 No. 310 “On approval of guidelines for the analysis of indicators used to assess the reliability of heat supply systems”. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    RF Government Decree of 16.05.2014 No. 452 “On approval of the rules for determining the planned and calculating the actual values of indicators of reliability and energy efficiency of heat supply facilities, as well as access to the specified milestones corresponding to the planned values from the subjects engaged in regulated activities in the heat supply system, and on amending the resolution of the government of the Russian Federation of May 15, 2010 No. 340”. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joint Order of the RF Ministry of Energy and RF Ministry of Regional Development No. 565/667 of 29.12.2012 “Guidelines for the development of heat supply schemes”. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Barlow and F. Proschan, Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1981; Nauka, Moscow, 1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MDK 4-01.2001. Guidelines for the Technical Investigation and Registration of Technological Violations in the Systems of Municipal Energy Supply and the Work of the Energy Organizations of the Housing and Utilities Complex (GUP TsPP, Moscow, 2001).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. V. Gnedenko and I. N. Kovalenko, Introduction to Queuing Theory (Nauka, Moscow, 1987; Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reliability of Energy Systems and Their Equipment: Handbook, Vol. 4: Reliability of Heat Supply Systems, Ed. by Yu. N. Rudenko (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. V. Sennova, S. N. Kiryukhin, and A. O. Shimanskaya, “Methodology and algorithm for calculating the indicators of reliability of heat supply to consumers and reservation of heat networks in the development of heat supply schemes,” Nov. Teplosnabzh., No. 12, 11–19 (2013).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. A. Stennikov and I. V. Postnikov, “Development of methods for analyzing the reliability of heat supply,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Probl. Energ., No. 5–6, 28–40 (2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. V. Postnikov and V. A. Stennikov, “Ensuring parametric reliability of heat supply systems,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Probl. Energ. 19 (3–4), 20–30 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. V. Postnikov, V. A. Stennikov, E. E. Mednikova, and A. V. Penkovskii, “A methodology for optimization of component reliability of heat supply systems,” Energy Procedia 105, 3083–3088 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. G. Akhmetova, The System of Comprehensive Assessment and Improvement of Efficiency of Centralized Heat Supply of Housing and Public Utilities and Industrial Enterprises, Doctoral Dissertation in Engineering (Kazan State Power Engineering Univ., Kazan, 2017).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. P. Gaidyshev, Solving Scientific and Engineering Problems using Excel, VBA and C/C++ (BKhV-Peterburg, St. Petersburg, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazan State Power Engineering UniversityKazanRussia
  2. 2.AO KazenergoKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations