Advertisement

The Effect of a Humate Reagent and Sodium Oleate on the Wettability of Fluorite, Calcite, and Quartz

  • S. A. Antsiferova
  • S. M. MarkosyanEmail author
  • O. N. Suvorova
CHEMICOMETALLURGICAL PROCESSES OF DEEP CONVERSION OF ORE, TECHNOGENIC, AND SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of a humate reagent obtained from oxidized brown coal and sodium oleate on the wettability of minerals present in the composition of fluorite ores such as fluorite, calcite, and quartz is studied. It is shown that, in the case of successive treatment of fluorite and calcite with a humate reagent and sodium oleate, the difference in the wettability of the minerals significantly increases, which promotes the selection of these minerals during flotation.

Keywords:

humate reagent sodium oleate fluorite calcite quartz contact angle wettability 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Matveeva, T.N., Lantsova, L.B., and Gapchich, A.O., Tests of reagent modes for the flotation of refractory gold-bearing ore using a vegetable modifying agent, Tsvetn. Met., 2016, no. 8, pp. 20–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chukhareva, N.V., Shishmina, L.V., and Novikov, A.A., Issledovanie guminovykh kislot iskhodnykh i termoobrabotannykh torfov Tomskoi oblasti: monografiya (Study of the Humic Acids of Original and Heat-Treated Peat in the Tomsk Region: A Monograph), Tomsk: Tomsk. Politekh. Univ., 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Timoshenko, L.I., Oparina, L.A., Samoilov, V.G., Markosyan, S.M., and Trofimov, B.N., Aminomethylated lignins as reagents-depressants for the flotation concentration of impregnated copper–nickel ores, Khim. Interesakh Ustoich. Razvit., 2011, no. 4 (19), pp. 421–425.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, M. and Guiraud, P., Elimination of TiO2 nanoparticles with the assist of humic acid: Influence of agglomeration in the dissolved air flotation process, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, vol. 260, pp. 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reyes-Bozo, L., Higueras, P., Godoy-Faúndez, A., Sobarzo, F., Sáez-Navarrete, C., Vásquez-Bestagno, J., and Herrera-Urbina, R., Assessment of the floatability of chalcopyrite, molybdenite and pyrite using biosolids and their main components as collectors for greening the froth flotation of copper sulphide ores, Miner. Eng., 2014, vol. 64, pp. 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.mineng.2014.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang, P., Cao, M., and Liu, Q., Using chitosan as a selective depressant in the differential flotation of Cu–Pb sulfides, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2012, vols. 106–109, pp. 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2012.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, R., Qin, W., Jiao, F., Wang, X., Pei, B., Yang, Y., and Lai, C., Flotation separation of chalcopyrite from galena by sodium humate and ammonium persulfate, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2016, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64113-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turrer, H.D.G. and Peres, A.E.C., Investigation on alternative depressants for iron ore flotation, Miner. Eng., 2010, vol. 23, pp. 1066–1069. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.mineng.2010.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jaiswal, S., Tripathy, S.K., and Banerjee, P.K., An overview of reverse flotation process for coal, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2015, vol. 134, pp. 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bocharov, V.A. and Ignatkina, V.A., Tekhnologiya obogashcheniya poleznykh iskopaemykh. V dvukh tomakh (Ore Beneficiation Technology, 2 vols.), Moscow: Ruda i Metally, 2007, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goloyuda, L.I., Antsiferova, S.A., and Nosova, Z.B., Extracts of humic acids: Promising reagents-modifiers in fluorspar ore beneficiation, Tsvetn. Met., 1989, no. 1, pp. 123–124.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Antsiferova, S.A., Markosyan, S.M., Samoilov, V.G., and Komleva, O.N., Specific features of the interaction of a humate reagent with fluorite, calcite, and quartz during flotation, Obogashch. Rud, 2007, no. 1, pp. 15–19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antsiferova, S.A. and Samoilov, V.G., Effect of different humate reagents on the flotation of fluorite, calcite, and quartz by sodium oleate, Sbornik tezisov dokladov IV Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Innovatsionnye razrabotki v oblasti dobychi i proizvodstva tsvetnykh i blagorodnykh metallov” (Abstracts of Papers Presented at the IV International Conference “Innovative Developments in the Field of Mining and Production of Nonferrous and Noble Metals), Ust-Kamenogorsk, 2007, vol. 1, pp. 250–254.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Antsiferova, S.A. and Samoilov, V.G., Preparation of a reagent-modifier based on humic substances from brown coal, Tsvetn. Met., 1997, no. 9, pp. 7–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antsiferova, S.A. and Samoilov, V.G., Humic acids from oxidized brown coal: Qualitative characterization and quantitative determination, Khim. Tekhnol., 2002, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abramov, A.A., Sobranie sochinenii. T. 7. Flotatsiya. Reagenty-sobirateli (Collected Works, vol. 7: Flotation: Reagents-Collectors), Moscow: Gornaya Kniga, 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Antsiferova
    • 1
  • S. M. Markosyan
    • 1
    Email author
  • O. N. Suvorova
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Research Center Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center, Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations