Advertisement

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 196, Issue 3, pp 1268–1281 | Cite as

Ermakov–Pinney and Emden–Fowler Equations: New Solutions from Novel Bäcklund Transformations

  • S. Carillo
  • F. Zullo
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

We study the class of nonlinear ordinary differential equations y″ y = F(z, y2), where F is a smooth function. Various ordinary differential equations with a well-known importance for applications belong to this class of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Indeed, the Emden–Fowler equation, the Ermakov–Pinney equation, and the generalized Ermakov equations are among them. We construct Bäcklund transformations and auto-Bäcklund transformations: starting from a trivial solution, these last transformations induce the construction of a ladder of new solutions admitted by the given differential equations. Notably, the highly nonlinear structure of this class of nonlinear ordinary differential equations implies that numerical methods are very difficult to apply.

Keywords

nonlinear ordinary differential equation Bäcklund transformation Schwarzian derivative Ermakov–Pinney equation Emden–Fowler equation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. W. Nijhoff, O. Ragnisco, and V. B. Kuznetsov, “Integrable time-discretisation of the Ruijsenaars–Schneider model,” Commun. Math. Phys., 176, 681–700 (1996).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. N. W. Hone, V. B. Kuznetsov, and O. Ragnisco, “Bäcklund transformations for many-body systems related to KdV,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 32, L299–L306 (1999).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Tsiganov, “On auto and hetero Bäcklund transformations for the Hénon–Heiles systems,” Phys. Lett. A, 379, 2903–2907 (2015).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. N. W. Hone, “Exact discretization of the Ermakov–Pinney equation,” Phys. Lett. A, 263, 347–354 (1999).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. I. Bobenko, B. Lorbeer, and Yu. B. Suris, “Integrable discretizations of the Euler top,” J. Math. Phys., 39, 6668–6683 (1998).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. B. Kuznetsov, M. Petrera, and O. Ragnisco, “Separation of variables and Bäcklund transformations for the symmetric Lagrange top,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37, 8495–8512 (2004).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O. Ragnisco and F. Zullo, “Bäcklund transformation for the Kirchhoff top,” SIGMA, 7, 13 (2011).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. V. Tsiganov, “Integrable Euler top and nonholonomic Chaplygin ball,” J. Geom. Mech., 3, 337–362 (2011).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Ragnisco and F. Zullo, “Bäcklund transformations as exact integrable time discretizations for the trigonometric Gaudin model,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43, 434029 (2010).ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Zullo, “Bäcklund transformations for the elliptic Gaudin model and a Clebsch system,” J. Math. Phys., 52, 073507 (2011).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Zullo, “Bäcklund transformations and Hamiltonian flows,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 46, 145203 (2013).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. N. W. Hone, O. Ragnisco, and F. Zullo, “Algebraic entropy for algebraic maps,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 49, 02LT01 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Carillo, “A novel Bäcklund invariance of a nonlinear differential equation,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 252, 828–839 (2000).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. K. Common and M. Musette, “Two discretisations of the Ermakov–Pinney equation,” Phys. Lett. A, 235, 574–580 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. P. Ermakov, “Second-order differential equations: conditions of complete integrability,” Appl. Anal. Discrete Math., 2, 123–145 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Chandrasekhar, An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structures, Dover, New York (1958).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Goenner and P. Havas, “Exact solutions of the generalized Lane–Emden equation,” J. Math. Phys., 41, 7029–7042 (2000).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Hille, Ordinary Differential Equations in the Complex Domain, Wiley, Toronto (1976).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Carillo, M. Lo Schiavo, and C. Schiebold, “Bäcklund transformations and non-abelian nonlinear evolution equations: A novel Bäcklund chart,” SIGMA, 12, 087 (2016).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Major, V. N. Gheorghe, and G. Werth, Charged Particle Traps: Physics and Techniques of Charged Particle Field Confinement (Springer Ser. Atomic Optical Plasma Phys., Vol. 37), Springer, Berlin (2005).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Torrontegui, S. Ibánez, X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, “Fast atomic transport without vibrational heating,” Phys. Rev. A, 83, 013415 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. I. Nicolin, “Resonant wave formation in Bose–Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. E, 84, 056202 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. G. Vergel and E. J. S. Villase˜nor, “The time-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator revisited: Applications to quantum field theory,” Ann. Phys., 324, 1360–1385 (2009).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R. L. Hawkins and J. E. Lidsey, “Ermakov–Pinney equation in scalar field cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D, 66, 023523 (2002).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Rogers, “On hybrid Ermakov–Painlevé systems: Integrable reduction,” J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 24, 239–249 (2017).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Rogers and W. K. Schief, “On Ermakov–Painlevé II systems: Integrable reduction,” Meccanica, 51, 2967–2974 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. Hertl, “Spherically symmetric nonstatic perfect fluid solutions with shear,” Gen. Rel. Grav., 28, 919–934 (1996).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Gbutzmann and U. Ritschel, “Analytic solution of Emden–Fowler equation and critical adsorption in spherical geometry,” Z. Phys. B, 96, 391–393 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Fuchssteiner and S. Carillo, “The action–angle transformation for soliton equations,” Phys. A, 166, 651–676 (1990).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Carillo and F. Zullo, “The Gross–Pitaevskii equation: Bäcklund transformations and admitted solutions,” Ricerche Mat. (2018 to appear); arXiv:1803.09228v2 [math-ph] (2018).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l’IngegneriaUniversità di Roma “La Sapienza,”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Instituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareRomeItaly
  3. 3.DICATAMUniversità di BresciaBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations