Solar System Research

, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 376–382 | Cite as

Analysis of the Components of a Different Physical Nature in the Interannual Variability of the Total Solar Irradiance Flux

  • V. M. FedorovEmail author


By its physical nature, the interannual variability of the solar radiation arriving at the Earth is a duplex with varying ratios of the amplitudes of the components depending on the time resolution. The analysis shows that the amplitude of the long-term variability of the radiation intensity is approximately 95% determined by the variations related to changes in the solar activity. At an annual resolution, the component determined by the solar activity is predominant in amplitude (approximately 80%). At a monthly resolution, the leading component of the duplex is the variation caused by the celestial-mechanical processes (approximately 55%). Thus, the interannual variations determined by the celestial-mechanical processes dominate in the interannual variability of incoming solar radiation within seasonal changes. The results point toward the necessity for a differentiated approach to the use of the values of the interannual solar radiation variability of different physical nature in the climatic models since their weight ratios depend on the time resolution.


solar radiation flux solar radiation intensity solar activity celestial-mechanical processes interannual variations 



  1. 1.
    Borisenkov, E.P., Tsvetkov, A.V., and Eddy, J.A., Combined effects of Earth orbit perturbations and solar activity on terrestrial insolation. Part 1: Sample days and annual mean values, J. Atmos. Sci., 1985, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 933–940.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ch. 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013, pp. 659–740.
  3. 3.
    Fedorov, V.M., Interannual variability of the solar constant, Sol. Syst. Res., 2012, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 170–176. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fedorov, V.M., Interannual variations in the duration of the tropical year, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2013, vol. 451, no. 1, pp. 750–753. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fedorov, V.M., Spatial and temporal variations in solar climate of the earth in the present epoch, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 2015, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 779–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fedorov, V.M., Theoretical calculation of the interannual variability of the Earth`s insolation with daily resolution, Sol. Syst. Res., 2016, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 220–224. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foukal, P., Fröhlich, C., Spruit, H., and Wigley, T.M.L., Variations in solar luminosity and their effect on the Earth’s climate, Nature, 2006, vol. 443, pp. 161–166. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fröhlich, C. and Lean, J., The Sun’s total irradiance: cycles, trends and climate change uncertainties since 1976, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998, vol. 25, pp. 4377–4380.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fröhlich, C., Observations of irradiance variability, Space Sci. Rev., 2000, vol. 94, pp. 15–24.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fröhlich, C., Total solar irradiance observations, Surv. Geophys., 2012, vol. 33, pp. 453–473. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    JPL Solar System dynamics, Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology, NASA. http:// Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kopp, G. and Lean, J.L., A new, lover value of total solar irradiance: evidence and climate significance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2011, vol. 38, p. L01706. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kopp, G., Fehlmann, A., Finsterle, W., Harber, D., Heuerman, K., and Willson, R., Total solar irradiance data record accuracy and consistency improvements, Metrologia, 2012, vol. 49, no. 2. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lean, J., Beer, J., and Bradley, R., Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1995, vol. 22, pp. 3195–3198.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lean, J., Rottman, G., Harder, J., and Kopp, G., SORCE contributions to new understanding of global change and solar variability, Sol. Phys., 2005, vol. 230, pp. 27–53.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations