Optics and Spectroscopy

, Volume 125, Issue 5, pp 627–631 | Cite as

Spectral and Kinetic Characteristics of the Luminescence of Ga2O3 Crystals Excited by Nano- and Subnanosecond Electron Beams

  • V. I. Oleshko
  • V. F. TarasenkoEmail author
  • D. V. Beloplotov
  • S. S. Vil’chinskaya


The spectral and kinetic characteristics of the emission of Sn- and Fe-doped Ga2O3 crystals excited by a nanosecond electron beam are studied. A new cathodoluminescence band of the Fe-doped crystal is revealed with a maximum at λm = 315 nm. Comparison with the data obtained with a subnanosecond duration of the beam current pulse is performed. It is shown that, with increasing duration of the beam current pulse, the main contribution is made by cathodoluminescence in the range of 300–450 nm.



We are grateful to I.A. Prudaev for providing Ga2O3 crystals for investigations.

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 18-19-00184) and partly by  the Program of increasing the competitiveness of    the Tomsk Polytechnic University (project VIU_IFVT_73/2017).


  1. 1.
    T. Onuma, S. Fujioka, T. Yamaguchi, M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, T. Masui, and T. Honda, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 041910 (2013). doi 10.1063/1.4816759ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Galazka, K. Irmscher, R. Uecker, R. Bertram, M. Pietsch, A. Kwasniewski, M. Naumann, T. Schulz, R. Schewski, D. Klimm, and M. Bickermann, J. Cryst. Growth 404, 184 (2014). doi 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.07.021ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Kuramata, K. Koshi, S. Watanabe, Y. Yamaoka, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1202A2 (2016). doi 10.7567/JJAP.55.1202A2Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. G. Burachenko, D. V. Beloplotov, I. A. Prudaev, D. A. Sorokin, V. F. Tarasenko, and O. P. Tolbanov, Opt. Spectrosc. 123, 867 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. A. Sorokin, A. G. Burachenko, D. V. Beloplotov, V. F. Tarasenko, E. K. Baksht, E. I. Lipatov, and M. I. Lomaev, J. Appl. Phys. 122, 154902 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. V. Savrukhin and E. A. Shestakov, Nucl. Fus. 55, 043016 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. J. Zhou, L. Q. Hu, Y. Zhang, G. Q. Zhong, and S. Y. Lin, Nucl. Fus. 57, 114002 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Rubel, S. Brezinsek, J. W. Coenen, A. Huber, A. Kirschner, A. Kreter, and G. Sergienko, Matter Rad. Extremes 2 (3), 87 (2017).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. M. Koval’chuk, G. A. Mesyats, B. M. Semin, and V. G. Shpak, Prib. Tekh. Eksp., No. 4, 15 (1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. I. Oleshko, E. Kh. Baksht, A. G. Burachenko, and V. F. Tarasenko, Tech. Phys. 62, 299 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Ya. Zagulov, A. S. Kotov, V. G. Shpak, Ya. Ya. Yuri-ke, and M. I. Yalandin, Prib. Tekh. Eksp., No. 2, 146 (1989).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. F. Tarasenko, E. Kh. Baksht, A. G. Burachenko, I. D. Kostyrya, M. I. Lomaev, and D. A. Sorokin, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 38, 2583 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Kh. Baksht, A. G. Burachenko, and V. F. Tarasenko, Tech. Phys. Lett. 36, 1020 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. I. Oleshko
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. F. Tarasenko
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. V. Beloplotov
    • 1
  • S. S. Vil’chinskaya
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of High-Current Electronics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia
  2. 2.National Research Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations