The Effect of Short-Term Drying on Biofilm Formed in a Model Water Distribution System
- 56 Downloads
In this study the effect of short-term drying on biofilm-related bacteria was investigated. Biofilm formation was encouraged to develop for nine months in a model water-distribution system. Biofilms were analyzed monthly for enumeration of aerobic and anaerobic heterotrophic bacteria, and sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) after 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours of exposure to drying. The numbers of live and dead bacteria were directly analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy. In addition, extracellular polysaccharide substances (EPS) extraction, carbohydrate analysis, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation were performed. The formation of a brown-colored, thin biofilm layer was observed on the inner surface of polypropylene pipes at the end of the experimental study. SEM micrographs showed that ruptures occurred in the biofilm layer due to effects of drying. The counts of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria and SRB in dried biofilm samples decreased significantly after 6 and 48 hours, respectively. According to 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyl-tetrazolium chloride (CTC) staining results, bacteria can remain viable for up to 72 hours after exposure to drying. The significant increase in the amount of carbohydrate after 48 hours of exposure to drying indicates that bacteria produce EPS as a protective mechanism against drying stress.
Keywords:biofilm extracellular polysaccharide substances short-term drying sulphate reducing bacteria water distribution systems
The model system was donated by Dizayn Teknik Plastic Pipes and Fittings Co. This work was supported by Scientific Research Project Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project numbers: FDP-2018-28949 and 2803.
- 1.Alkan, U., Teksoy, A., and Acar, Ö., Detection of the factors effecting bacterial regrowth in drinking water network, İTÜ dergisi, 2005, vol. 15, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
- 6.Baş, D. and Türetgen, I., The effect of short time drying and temperature change on microbial biofilm formation in a model pipe rig feed with distributed network water, Türk Mikrobiyol. Cem. Derg., 2011, vol. 41, pp. 155–161.Google Scholar
- 9.Burke, V., Robinson, J., Gracey, M., Petersen, D., and Partridge, K., Isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila from a metropolitan water supply: seasonal correlation with clinical isolates, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1984, vol. 48, pp. 361–366.Google Scholar
- 13.Ekinci, Ö., Konak, H., and Öztürk, E. A minimum head loss optimization strategy for water distribution networks, Jeodezi, Jeinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, 2005, vol. 92, pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
- 16.Kooij, D.V.D., Lieverloo, J.H.M., Schellart, J., and Hiemstra, P., Maintaining quality without a disinfectant residual, Maintaining Disinfection, 1999, vol. 91, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
- 18.Momba, M.N.B., Kfir, R., Venter, S.N., and Cloete, T.E., An overview of biofilm formation in distribution systems and its impact on the deterioration of water quality, Water SA, 2000, vol. 26, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
- 21.Postgate, J.R. The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
- 23.Reasoner, D.J. and Geldrich, E.E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1985, vol. 49, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
- 24.Rodriguez, G.G., Phipps, D., Ishiguro, K., and Ridgway, H.F., Use of a fluorescent redox probe for direct visualization of actively respiring bacteria, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1992, vol. 58, pp. 1801–1808.Google Scholar
- 27.Tuovinen, O.H. and Hsu, J.C., Aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in tubercles of the Columbus, Ohio, water distribution system, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1982, vol. 44, pp. 761–764.Google Scholar
- 29.Veenendaal, H.R. and Kooij, D., Biofilm Formation Potential of Pipe Materials in Plumbing Systems, Kiwa NV Res. Consult., The Netherlands, Min. Public Hous. Urban Plan. Environ., 1999.Google Scholar