Evaluation of Glucose Absorption Level in the Small Intestine of Different Rat Strains under Natural Conditions

  • A. A. GruzdkovEmail author
  • Yu. V. Dmitrieva
  • A. S. Alekseeva
  • A. S. Polozov
  • L. V. Gromova
Comparative and Ontogenic Physiology


The peculiarities of carbohydrate metabolism were studied in seven rat strains under conditions maximally approximating natural ones. The glucose absorption level in the small intestine was evaluated using a method based on ad libitum drinking of concentrated glucose solutions by prefasted (18–20 h) rats. It was shown that in the steady-state regime the volume-normalized uptake rate of glucose solution (mL/min) was constant and inversely proportional to the glucose concentration in the solution, while the uptake rate of glucose itself (μmol/min) was independent of the substrate concentration in quite a wide range, being mainly determined by the absorptive capacity of the small intestine. A significant difference was revealed between the tested rat strains in terms of the rate of glucose absorption from its solution (200 g/L). In the daytime (10 AM–4 PM), the highest rates were observed in Sprague Dawley rats (116.7 ± 3.1 μmol/min) while the lowest—in Wistar Kyoto rats (35.6 ± 1.1 μmol/min). In the evening (4–10 PM), rates of glucose absorption in different rat strains were 1.3–2.2 times higher than in the daytime. Apparently, the increased absorptive capacity of the small intestine in the evening is due to enhanced SGLT1-mediated active glucose transport and reflects the peculiarities of carbohydrate metabolism regulation in different rat strains.

Key words

different rat strains glucose consumption and absorption carbohydrate metabolism diurnal rhythms 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Suzuki, T., Douard, V., Mochizuki, K., Goda, T., and Ferraris, R.P., Diet-induced epigenetic regulation in vivo of the intestinal fructose transporter Glut5 during development of rat small intestine, Biochem. J., 2011, vol. 435, pp. 43–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaudhry, R.M., Garg, A., Abdelfatah, M.M., Duenes, J.A., and Sarr, M.G., Lack of functionally active sweet taste receptors in the jejunum in vivo in the rat, J. Surg. Res., 2013, vol. 183, pp. 606–611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ugolev, A.M. and Zaripov, B.Z., The techniques for studying membrane digestion and absorption in the small intestine under conditions of chronic experiment on rats and some other animals, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR, 1979, vol. 65, pp. 1849–1853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gruzdkov, A.A. and Gromova, L.V., Coupling of disaccharide hydrolysis with absorption of resultant glucose in the small intestine in vivo, Dokl. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1995, vol. 342, pp. 830–832.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gromova, L.V., Grefner, N.M., Gruzdkov, A.A., and Komissarchik, Ya.Yu., The role of facilitated diffusion in glucose transport across the apical membrane of enterocytes, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I.M. Sechenova, 2006, vol. 92, pp. 362–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruzdkov, A.A. and Gromova, L.V., Glucose absorption in the rat small intestine in vivo after various levels of local substrate loads, Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I.M. Sechenova, 2013, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 630–641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gruzdkov, A.A., Gromova, L.V., Dmitrieva, Yu.V., and Alekseeva, A.S., Free consumption of glucose solution by rats as a criterion for evaluation of its absorption in the small intestine (an experimental study and mathematical modeling), Ross. Fiziol. Zh. im. I.M. Sechenova, 2015, vol. 101, pp. 708–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam, M.M., O’Connor, T.P., and Diamond, J., Loads, capacities and safety factors of maltase and the glucose transporter SGLT1 in mouse intestinal brush border, J. Physiol., 2002, vol. 542, pp. 493–500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skvortsova, N.B., Volkonskaya, V.A., Tulyaganova, E.Kh., Zabolotnykh, V.A., Ugolev, A.M., and Khokhlov, A.S., Existence of a special appetiteregulating intestinal hormone, arenterin, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1975, vol. 220, pp. 493–495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hellström, P.M., Grybäck, P., and Jacobsson, H., The physiology of gastric emptying, Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol., 2006, vol. 20, pp. 397–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maljaars, P.W., Maljaars Peters, H.P., Mela, D.J., and Masclee, A.A., Ileal brake: a sensible food target for appetite control, a review, Physiol. Behav., 2008, vol. 95, pp. 271–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips, L.K., Deane, A.M., Jones, K.L., Rayner, C.K., and Horowitz, M., Gastric emptying and glycaemia in health and diabetes mellitus, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., 2015, vol. 11, pp. 112–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhutta, H.Y., Deelman, T.E., Ashley, S.W., Rhoads, D.B., and Tavakkoli, A., Disrupted circadian rhythmicity of the intestinal glucose transporter SGLT1 in Zucker diabetic fatty rats, Dig. Dis. Sci., 2013, vol. 58, pp. 1537–1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balakrishnan, A., Stearns, A.T., Ashley, S.W., Tavakkolizadeh, A., and Rhoads, D.B., Restricted feeding phase shifts clock gene and sodium glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) expression in rats, J. Nutr., 2010, vol. 140, pp. 908–914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Gruzdkov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yu. V. Dmitrieva
    • 1
  • A. S. Alekseeva
    • 1
  • A. S. Polozov
    • 1
  • L. V. Gromova
    • 1
  1. 1.Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations