Investigation on the Damage Mechanisms and Penetration Performance of Jacketed Rods with Different Striking Velocities

  • K. TangEmail author
  • J. Wang
  • X. Chen
  • N. Zhou


Ballistic experiments, numerical simulations, and theoretical model investigations of the penetration performance of homogeneous and jacketed rods into a semi-infinite target are presented. The striking velocities vary between 0.9 and 3.3 km/s. The effects of the jacket material, striking velocity, and initial kinetic energy on the penetration performance and damage mechanisms are analyzed. The results show that jacketed rods provide better penetration performance than homogeneous rods with the same initial kinetic energy. For a fixed ratio of the jacket radius to the core radius, it is preferable to use a jacket material with a lower density and strength that can provide the lowest required flexural stiffness.


jacketed rod 93W tungsten 1060Al aluminum alloy TC4 titanium alloy 4340 steel target striking velocity penetration performance damage mechanism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    H. J. Ernst, W. Lanz, and T. Wolf, “Penetration Comparison of L/D = 20 and 30 Mono-Block Penetrators with L/D = 40 Jacketed Penetrators in Different Target Materials,” in Proc. of the 19th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, Interlaken (Switzerland), May 7–11, 2001 (Interlaken, 2001), pp. 1151–1158.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Andersson and J. Ottosson, “High Velocity Jacketed Long Rod Projectiles Hitting Oblique Steel Plates,” in Proc. of the 19th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, Interlaken (Switzerland), May 7–11, 2001 (Interlaken, 2001), pp. 1241–1247.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. F. Lehr, E. Wollman, and G. Koerber, “Experiments with Jacketed Rods of High Fineness Ratio,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 17, 517–526 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. A. Pedersen, S. J. Bless, and J. U. Cazamias, “Hypervelocity Jacketed Penetrators,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 26, 603–611 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Lee, “Analysis of Jacketed Rod Penetration,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 24, 891–905 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. R. Sorensen, K. D. Kimsey, J. A. Zukas, and K. Frank, “Numerical Analysis and Modeling of Jacketed Rod Penetration,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 22, 71–91 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. M. Wen, Y. He, and B. Lan, “A Combined Numerical and Theoretical Study on the Penetration of a Jacketed Rod into Semi-Infinite Targets,” Int. J. Impact Eng. 38, 1001–1010 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, “A Constitutive Model and Data for Metals Subjected to Large Strains, High Strain Rates and High Temperature,” in Proc. of the 7th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, Hague (Netherlands), April 19–21, 1983 (Hague, 1983), pp. 541–547.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. J. Steinberg, S. G. Cochran, and M. W. Guinan, “A Constitutive Model for Metals Applicable at High Strain Rate,” J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1498–1504 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. G. Cullis and N. J. Lynch, “Hydrocode and Experimental Analysis of Scale Size Jacketed KE Projectiles,” in Proc. of the 14th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, Quebec (Canada), September 26–29, 1993 (Nat. Defence Res. Establishment, Sundbyberg, 1993), pp. 271–280.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. E. Anderson, B. L. Morris, and D. L. Littlefield, “A Penetration Mechanics Database: Report,” Southwest Res. Inst. No. 3591/001 (San Antonio, 1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Key Laboratory of Transient PhysicsNanjing University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Criminal Science and TechnologyNanjing Forest Police CollegeNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations