Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics

, Volume 59, Issue 7, pp 1251–1260 | Cite as

Simulation of Primary Film Atomization Due to Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability

  • M. G. KazimardanovEmail author
  • S. V. Mingalev
  • T. P. Lubimova
  • L. Yu. Gomzikov


Liquid film atomization under a high-speed air flow (water was considered as the liquid) due to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability is studied using the volume of fluid (VOF) method. We develop an approach for modeling the primary breakup and use it to investigate the grid convergence, choose the optimal size of the grid cell, and calculate the primary breakup of the film in the channel. The dependences of the mean break-off angle, the velocity modulus, and the Sauter droplet diameter on the longitudinal coordinate of the channel are obtained. The step-by-step averaging over the ensemble of droplets and over time allows us to get smooth coordinate dependences of the characteristics of the ensemble of the droplet. The value of the most useful parameter for engineering applications, the mean Sauter diameter D32 (equal to the ratio of the mean droplet volume to its mean area) is close to that obtained using a semiempirical formula from the literature, based on the experiment where hot wax is atomized by a high-speed airflow. The dependence of the Sauter mean diameter on the thickness of the liquid layer agrees qualitatively with the experimental dependence. The study of the grid’s convergence showed that the number of the smallest droplets increases rapidly with decreasing cell size. Their contribution to the average characteristics of the droplet’s ensemble, however, remains insignificant; nonetheless, their input to the mean characteristics remains insignificant; thus, there is no reason to decrease the grid cell size to account for small droplets.


Kelvin–Helmholtz instability volume of fluid (VOF) method 2D flow atomization Sauter mean diameter 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Luo, H. and Svendsen, H.F., Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions, AIChE J., 1996, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1225–1233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lehr, F., Millies, M., and Mewes, D., Bubble-size distributions and flow fields in bubble columns, AIChE J., 2002, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2426–2443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Rourke, P.J. and Amsden, A.A., The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup, SAE Tech. Papers, 1987, p. 872089. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beale, J.C. and Reitz, R.D., Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin–Helmholtz/Rayleigh–Taylor hybrid model, Atomiz. Spray, 1999, vol. 9, pp. 623–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ménard, T., Tanguy, S., and Berlemont, A., Coupling level set/VOF/ghost fluid methods: validation and application to 3D simulation of the primary break-up of a liquid jet, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 2007, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 510–524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berlemont, A., Bouali, Z., Cousin, J., Desjonqueres, P., Doring, M., Menard, T., and Noel, E., Simulation of liquid/gas interface break-up with a coupled Level Set/VOF/Ghost fluid method, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics ICCFD7-2105, Big Island, Hawaii, July 9–13, 2012. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Desjardins, O., McCaslin, J., Owkes, M., and Brady, P., Direct numerical and large-eddy simulation of primary atomization in complex geometries, Atomiz. Spray, 2013, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1001–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mehravaran, K., Direct simulations of primary atomization in moderate-speed diesel fuel injection, Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf., 2013, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 207–209. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ling, Y., Fuster, D., Tryggvason, G., Scardovelli, R., and Zaleski, St., 3D DNS of spray formation in gasassisted atomization, in Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Montreal, Canada, Aug. 21–26, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaussonnet, G., Riber, E., Vermorel, O., Cuenot, B., Gepperth, S., and Koch, R., Large Eddy Simulation of a prefilming airblast atomizer, in Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chania, Greece, September 1–4, 2013.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeffreys, H., On the formation of water waves by wind, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1925, vol. 107, no. 742, pp. 189–206. ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andritsos, N. and Hanratty, T.J., Interfacial instabilities for horizontal gas-liquid flows in pipeline, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1987, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 583–603. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tian, Ch. and Chen, Y., Numerical simulation of Kelvin–Helmholtz instability: a two-dimensional parametrical study, Astrophys. J., 2016, vol. 824, no. 1. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, H.G. and Kim, J., Two-dimensional Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities of multi-component fluids, Eur. J. Mech. A, 2015, vol. 49, pp. 77–88. ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woodmanse, D.E. and Hanratty, Th.J., Mechanism for the removal of droplets from a liquid surface by a parallel air flow, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1969, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 299–307. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raynal, L., Instability on the gas-liquid mixture interface, PhD Thesis, Grenoble: Univ. J. Fourier, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jerome, J.J.S., Marty, S., Matas, J., Zaleski, St., and Hoepffner, J., Vortices catapult droplets in atomization, Phys. Fluids, 2013, vol. 25, no. 11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ebner, J., Gerendás, M., Schäfer, O., and Wittig, S., Droplet entrainment from a shear-driven liquid wall film in inclined ducts: experimental study and correlation comparison, in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June 4–7, 2001, Paper No. 2001-GT-0115. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shalanin, V.A., Eulerian methods for modeling flows with free surface, Molod. Uchen., 2016, no. 2 (106), pp. 258–261.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leonov, A.A., Chudanov, V.V., and Aksenova, A.E., Methods of direct numerical simulation in two-phase media, in Trudy IBRAE RAN (Collection of Articles of IBRAE RAS), Bolshov, L.A., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 2013, no. 14.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lyubimov, D.V. and Lyubimova, T.P., About a numerical method for solution of problem with deformable interface, Model. Mekh., 1990, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 136–140.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brackbill, J.U., Kothe, D.B., and Zemach, C., A continuum method for modeling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys., 1992, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 335–354. ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Senecal, P.K., Schmidt, D.P., Nouar, I., Rutland, C.J., Reitz, R.D., and Corradini, M.L., Modeling highspeed viscous liquid sheet atomization, Int. J. Multiphas. Flow, 1999, vol. 25, nos. 6–7, pp. 1073–1097. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dombrowski, N. and Hooper, P.C., The effect of ambient density on drop formation in sprays, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1962, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 291–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dombrowski, N. and Johns, W.R., The aerodynamic instability and disintegration of viscous liquid sheets, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1963, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 203–214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Strokach, E.A. and Borovik, I.N., Numerical simulation of kerosene dispersion process by the centrifugal atomizer, Vestn. MGTU Baumana, Ser. Mashinostr., 2016, no. 3 (108), pp. 37–54. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mayer, E., Theory of liquid atomization in high velocity gas streams, ARS J., 1961, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1783–1785.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weiss, M.A. and Worsham, C.H., Atomization in high velocity airstreams, ARS J., 1959, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 252–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. G. Kazimardanov
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. V. Mingalev
    • 2
  • T. P. Lubimova
    • 1
    • 3
  • L. Yu. Gomzikov
    • 2
  1. 1.Perm State UniversityPermRussia
  2. 2.AO ODK-AviadvigatelPermRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Continuous Media Mechanics, Ural BranchRussian Academy of SciencesPermRussia

Personalised recommendations