Advertisement

JETP Letters

, Volume 109, Issue 7, pp 437–440 | Cite as

Anomalous Decrease in the Threshold of Stimulated Raman Scattering near the Surface of Liquid Nitrogen

  • S. M. PershinEmail author
  • M. Ya. Grishin
  • V. N. Lednev
  • P. A. Chizhov
Optics and Laser Physics
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

An anomalously strong (up to 13 times) reduction of the threshold of the stimulated Raman scattering of 15-ps laser pulses in liquid nitrogen has been found when moving the caustic of a pump beam from the bulk through the free surface. A nonmonotonic N-shaped dependence of the stimulated Raman scattering threshold on the distance of the beam waist to the surface has been recorded for the first time with a minimum reached when the plane front of the beam caustic coincides with the surface. The physical mechanism of the detected phenomenon has been discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. A. Akhmanov and R. V. Khokhlov, Nonlinear Optics (VINITI, Moscow, 1964; Gordon and Breach, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. T. Platonenko and P. B. Khokhlov, Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 1435 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Z. Grasyuk, V. F. Efimkov, I. G. Zubarev, V. M. Mishin, and V. G. Smirnov, JETP Lett. 8, 291 (1968).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic, Orlando, 2008).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. N. Smetanin, M. Jelinek, V. Kubeček, H. Jelinkova, and L. I. Ivleva, Appl. Phys. B 122, 260 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. M. Pershin, M. Ya. Grishin, V. N. Lednev, S. V. Garnov, V. V. Bukin, P. A. Chizhov, I. A. Khodasevich, and V. B. Oshurko, Laser Phys. Lett. 15, 035701 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. B. Grun, A. K. McQuillan, and B. P. Stoicheff, Phys. Rev. 180, 179 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. D. Kudryavtseva, A. I. Sokolovskaya, and M. M. Sushchinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 32, 849 (1970).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. A. Akhmanov, B. V. Zhdanov, A. I. Kovrigin, and S. M. Pershin, JETP Lett. 15, 185 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. A. Akhmanov and G. A. Lyakhov, Sov. Phys. JETP 39, 43 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. S. Gorelik, A. D. Kudryavtseva, N. V. Tcherniega, A. I. Vodchits, and V. A. Orlovich, J. Russ. Laser Res. 34, 50 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. V. Zhdanov, L. L. Kulyuk, and S. M. Pershin, Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 6, 550 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. A. Karnaukhov, V. B. Morozov, A. N. Olenin, and D. V. Yakovlev, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 414, 012027 (2013).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Ganin, K. Lapshin, A. Obidin, and S. Vartapetov, Appl. Phys. A 123, 378 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. A. Lyakhov and N. V. Suyazov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 19, 617 (1993).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. S. Gorelik, A. V. Skrabatun, V. A. Orlovich, Yu. P. Voinov, A. I. Vodchits, and A. Yu. Pyatyshev, Quantum Electron. 49, 231 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. V. Zhdanov, V. V. Kalitin, A. I. Kovrigin, and S. M. Pershin, Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. 1, 368 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Pershin
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Ya. Grishin
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. N. Lednev
    • 1
  • P. A. Chizhov
    • 1
  1. 1.Prokhorov General Physics InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyState UniversityDolgoprudnyi, Moscow regionRussia

Personalised recommendations