Advertisement

High Energy Chemistry

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 22–25 | Cite as

Triplet–Triplet Energy Transfer as a Reason for Quenching by Thionine of the Triplet State of Eosin in Complexes with Cucurbit[7, 8]urils in Water

  • T. V. Fedotova
  • V. N. Gutrov
  • G. V. ZakharovaEmail author
  • A. K. ChibisovEmail author
  • M. V. Alfimov
PHOTONICS
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Quenching of the triplet state of eosin by thionine in water in the absence and in presence of cucurbit[7,8]urils has been studied by measuring phosphorescence, delayed fluorescence, and triplet–triplet absorption. The quenching is due to triplet–triplet (T–T) energy transfer between eosin (energy donor) and thionine, as well as its monomeric (with cucurbit[7]uril, CB7) and dimeric (with cucurbit[8]uril, CB8) complexes (energy acceptors) in deoxygenated aqueous solution at room temperature. The value of the quenching rate constant of phosphorescence, delayed fluorescence, and the triplet state of eosin by free (unbound) thionine is 3.8 × 109 L mol–1 s–1. Triplet–triplet energy transfer between eosin and the monomeric complex of thionine with CB7 occurs with a rate constant of 3.7 × 109 L mol–1 s–1. The triplet–triplet transfer between eosin and dimeric complexes of thionine with CB8, measured by quenching of delayed fluorescence and phosphorescence, occurs with a rate constant of 8.3 × 109 L mol–1 s–1. The energy transfer according to the triplet–triplet absorption data occurs with a rate constant of 8.7 × 109 L mol–1 s–1. The different effect of cucurbit[7]uril and cucurbit[8]uril on the quenching efficiency is due to the structural features of the monomeric and dimeric complexes of thionine, as well as to the value of the Coulomb interaction between the eosin anion and the cation of monomeric and dication of dimeric complexes. The observed differences in the values of quenching rate constants can be due to the different shape and extension of the molecular orbitals of the monomeric and dimeric complexes of thionine, which leads to different overlapping of the energy donor and acceptor wave functions.

Keywords:

eosin thionine cucurbit[7,8]urils triplet–triplet energy transfer phosphorescence delayed fluorescence T–T absorption nanosecond laser photolysis 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the State Assignment of the Photochemistry Center “Crystallography and Photonics” of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the measurements of the kinetic decay curves of delayed fluorescence and phosphorescence, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for spectral and luminescent measurements (project no. 18-03-00183) and laser-kinetic measurements (project no. 16-29-11765 ofi_m).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Chibisov, A.K., Khim. Vys. Energ., 1976, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ermolaev, V.L., Bodunov, E.N., Sveshnikova, E.B., and Shakhverdov, T.A., Bezyzluchatel’nyi perenos energii elektronnogo vozbuzhdeniya (Nonradiative Electronic-Excitation Energy Transfer), Leningrad: Nauka, 1977.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zakharova, G.V., Korobov, V.E., and Chibisov, A.K., Teor. Eksp. Khim., 1982, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 343.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chibisov, A.K., Usp. Khim., 1981, vol. 50, no. 7, p. 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korobov, V.E. and Chibisov, A.K., Usp. Khim., 1983, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chibisov, A.K., Prog. React. Kinet., 1984, vol. 13, p. 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dexter, D.L., J. Phys. Chem., 1953, no. 5, p. 836.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zakharova, G.V., Avakyan, V.G., Markelov, V.P, et al., High Energy Chem., 2015, vol. 49, no. 6, p. 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zwicker, E.F. and Grosweiner, L.I., J. Phys. Chem., 1963, vol. 67, p. 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasche, V. and Lindqvist, L., Photochem. Photobiol., 1965, vol. 4, p. 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zakharova, G.V., Lifanov, Yu.I., and Chibisov, A.K., Zh. Anal. Khim., 1980, vol. 35, no. 10, p. 1905.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zakharova, G.V. and Chibisov, A.K., Khim. Vys. Energ., 1984, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 552.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montes-Navajas, P., Corma, A., and Garcia, H., Chem. Phys. Chem, 2008, vol. 9, p. 713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Montes-Navajas, P. and Garcia, H., Photochem. Photobiol., 2009, vol. 204, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xi, Y.Y., Tang, Q., Huang, Y., Tao, Z., Xue, S.F., and Zhu, Q.J., Spectrosc. Spectral Anal., 2016, vol. 36, no. 6, p. 1809.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atabekyan, L.S., Avakyan, V.G., Zakharova, G.V., and Chibisov, A.K., High Energy Chem., 2018, vol. 52, no. 2, p. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Photochemistry Center of Federal Scientific Research Center “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)DolgoprudnyiRussia

Personalised recommendations