Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 58, Issue 7, pp 959–965 | Cite as

Influence of Supergranulation on the Properties of Sunspot Bipoles

  • A. G. Tlatov
  • K. A. Tlatova
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The properties of solar bipoles based on data from magnetic field observations at Mount Wilson Observatory during the period of 1917–2016 are considered. Special attention is given to variations in the size of the bipole magnetic axis during the solar cycle. It is shown that the distribution of the length of the bipole magnetic axis is close to lognormal with the exception of secondary local peaks. Secondary peaks are also present in the distribution of the tilt angles of bipoles at different latitudes. The influence of matter flows in supergranules on the length of the magnetic axis and the tilt angles of sunspot bipoles is discussed.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-02-00098-a, and Russian Scientific Foundation, project no. 15-12-20001.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Babcock, H.W., The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle, Astrophys. J., 1961, vol. 133, pp. 527–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bumba, V., Pr. Wroclaw. Tow. Nauk., Ser. B, 1963, vol. 112, pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bumba, V., Ranzinger, P., and Suda, J., Photospheric convective network as a determining factor in sunspot and group development and stabilization, Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech., 1973, vol. 24, pp. 22–38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dmitrieva, M.G., Kopecký, M., and Kuklin, G.V., The supergranular pattern and the stable stages of sunspot groups, in Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions, International Astronomical Union Symposium No. 35, Dordrecht: Springer, 1968, pp. 174–177.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., and Howard, R.F., Comparisons between theory and observation of active region tilts, Astrophys. J., 1995, vol. 438, pp. 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gizon, L., Duvall, T.L., Jr, and Schou, J., Wave-like properties of solar supergranulation, Nature, 2003, vol. 421, pp. 43–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hale, G.E. and Nicholson, S.B., Magnetic Observations of Sunspots 1917–1924, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1925.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., and Joy, A.H., The magnetic polarity of sun-spots, Astrophys. J., 1919, vol. 49, pp. 153–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harvey, K.L., Magnetic bipoles on the Sun, Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht: Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Howard, R.F., The magnetic fields of active regions. VI. Magnetic axis tilt changes, Sol. Phys., 1991, vol. 132, pp. 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leighton, R.B., A magneto–kinematic model of the solar cycle, Astrophys. J., 1969, vol. 156, pp. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muñoz-Jaramillo, A., Senkpeil, R.R., Windmueller, J.C., Amouzou, E.C., Longcope, D.W., Tlatov, A.G., Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Pevtsov, A.A., Chapman, G.A., Cookson, A.M., Yeates, A.R., Watson, F.T., Balmaceda, L.A., DeLuca, E.E., and Martens, P.C.H., Small-scale and global dynamos and the area and flux distributions of active regions, sunspot groups, and sunspots: A multi-database study, Astrophys. J., 2015a, vol. 800, id 48.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muñoz-Jaramillo, A., Senkpeil, R.R., Longcope, D.W., Tlatov, A.G., Pevtsov, A.A., Balmaceda, L.A., DeLuca, E.E., and Martens, P.C.H., The minimum of solar cycle 23: As deep as it could be?, Astrophys. J., 2015b, vol. 804, no. 1, id 68.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Pevtsov, A.A., and Livingston, W.C., On a possible explanation of the long-term decrease in sunspot field strength, Astrophys. J., 2012, vol. 758, pp. L20–L25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rieutord, M. and Rincon, F., The Sun’s supergranulation, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2010, vol. 7, no. 1, id 82.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., and Howard, R.F., Measurement of Kodaikanal white-light images. I. A comparison of 35 years of Kodaikanal and Mount Wilson sunspot data, Sol. Phys., 1993, vol. 146, pp. 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Surkov E.P., in Fizika solnechnoi aktivnosti (Physics of Solar Activity), Vladivostok, 1973, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tlatov, A.G., Vasil’eva, V.V., and Pevtsov, A.A., Distribution of magnetic bipoles on the Sun over three solar cycles, Astrophys. J., 2010, vol. 717, pp. 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tlatov, A., Illarionov, E., Sokoloff, D., and Pipin, V., A new dynamo pattern revealed by the tilt angle of bipolar sunspot groups, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 2013, vol. 432, pp. 2975–2984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tlatova, K.A., Vasil’eva, V.V., and Pevtsov, A.A., Long-term variations in the sunspot magnetic fields and bipole properties from 1918 to 2014, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2015, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 896–901.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vitinsky, Yu.I., Kopecký, M., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistika pyatnoobrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti Solntsa (Statistics of Sunspot Formation Activity), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weart, S.R., The birth and growth of sunspot regions, Astrophys. J., 1970, vol. 162, pp. 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kislovodsk Mountain Astronomical Station, Central Astronomical Observatory, Russian Academy of SciencesKislovodskRussia
  2. 2.Kalmyk State UniversityElistaRussia

Personalised recommendations