Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 753–767 | Cite as

Space Weather and Specific Features of the Development of Current Solar Cycle

  • V. N. IshkovEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

According to the cyclicity pattern of a reliable series of the relative sunspot number, cycle 24 opens the second epoch of lowered solar activity (SA). The main specific feature of this epoch (five cycles) is the inhibition of high solar cycles and the strict fulfillment of basic observational rules in the development of individual cycles. The more than two-fold decrease in the background values of the solar general magnetic field by the end of cycle 23 led to a complete rearrangement of physical conditions, both on the Sun and in the inner heliosphere, and affected the state of the near-Earth space (NES). After 9.2 years of development, the current solar cycle, 24, became a cycle of low magnitude (W* = 81.9) with reduced flare activity, lower geoeffectiveness of active solar phenomena, and a near absence of the most powerful flare events, solar proton events, geomagnetic activity manifestations, and ionospheric disturbances.

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Ebert, R., McComas, D., Elliott, H., Forsyth, R., and Gosling, J., Bulk properties of the slow and fast solar wind and interplanetary coronal mass ejections measured by Ulysses: Three polar orbits of observations, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, no. A1. doi 10.1029/2008JA013631Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gibson, S.E., Kozyra, J.U., Kozyra, G., de Toma, G., Emery, B., Onsager, T., and Thompson, B., If the Sun is so quiet, why is the Earth ringing? A comparison of two solar minimum intervals, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, A09105. doi 10.1029/2009JA014342Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gopalswamy, N., Akiyama, S., Yashiro, S., Xie, H., Maekelae, P., and Michalek, G., The mild space weather in solar cycle 24, in Proceedings of the 14th International Ionospheric Effects Symposium “Bridging the Gap Between Applications and Research Involving Ionospheric and Space Weather Disciplines”, Alexandria, Virginia, 12‒15 May 2015, 2015. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1508/1508.01603.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hao, Y., Shi, H., Xiao, Z., and Zhang, D., Weak ionization of the global ionosphere in solar cycle 24, Ann. Geophys., 2014, vol. 32, pp. 809–816. http://www.ann-geophys.net/32/809/2014. doi 10.5194/angeo-32-809-2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harvey, K., Harvey, J., and Sheeley, N., Magnetic measurements of coronal holes during 1975–1980, Sol. Phys., 1982, vol. 79, pp. 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofmeister, S.J., Veronig, A., Reiss, M.A., Temmer, M., Vennerstrom, S., Vršnak, B., and Heber, B., Characteristics of low-latitude coronal holes near the maximum of solar cycle 24, Astrophys. J., 2017, vol. 835, no. 2, id 268. doi 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/268Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ishkov, V.N., Emerging magnetic fluxes as a key to prediction of large solar flares, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz., 1998, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1835–1839.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishkov, V.N., Forecast of geoeffective solar flares: Resources and limitations, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Fiz., 1999, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 2148–2151.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishkov, V.N., Characteristics of solar activity of the extended epoch of the minimum of solar cycles 23–24, in Tsikly Aktivnosti na Solntse i zvezdakh (Solar and Stellar Activity Cycles), St. Petersburg: VVM, 2009, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishkov, V.N., Properties and surprises of solar activity XXIII cycle, Sun Geosphere, 2010, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 43–46.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishkov, V.N., Reduced and extended periods of solar activity: Monitoring features and key facts, in Trudy Pulkovskoi konferentsii “Solnechnaya i solnechno–zemnaya fizika-2013” (Proceedings of the Pulkovo Conference “Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics-2013”), Nagovitsin, Yu.A., Ed., St. Petersburg: VVM, 2013a, pp. 111–114. http://www.gao.spb.ru/russian/publ-s/conf_2013/conf_2013.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishkov, V.N., Complex active regions as the main source of extreme and large solar proton events, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2013b, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 971–976. doi 10.1134/S0016793213080070Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ishkov, V.N. and Shibaev, I.G., Solar activity cycles: General characteristics and modern forecasting boundaries, Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys., 2006, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1643–1647.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McComas, D.J., Angold, N., Elliott, H.A., Livadiotis, G., Schwadron, N.A., Skoug, R.M., and Smith, C.W., Weakest solar wind of the space age and the current “mini” solar maximum, Astrophys. J., 2013, vol. 779, no. 1, id 2. doi 10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/2Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mewaldt, R., Cohen, C., Mason, C., von Rosenvinge, T., Vourlidas, A., A 360° survey of solar energetic particle events and one extreme event, in The 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference, The Hague, Netherlands: 30 July–6 August, 2015. https://pos.sissa.it/236/139/pdf.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Otkidychev, P.A. and Skorbezh, N.N., Specific features of solar activity cycle 24 and their correlation with general regularities of cycles 19–23, in Trudy Pulkovskoi konferentsii “Solnechnaya i solnechno–zemnaya fizika-2013” (Proceedings of the Pulkovo Conference “Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics-2013”), Nagovitsin, Yu.A., Ed., St. Petersburg: VVM, 2013, pp. 187–190.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paassilta, M., Raukunen, O., Vainio, R., et al., Catalogue of 55–80 MeV solar proton events extending through solar cycles 23 and 24, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2017, vol. 7, id A14. doi 10.1051/swsc/2017013Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Selvakumaran, R., Veenadhari, B., Akiyama, S., Pandya, M., Gopalswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Kumar, S., Mäkelä, P., and Xie, H., On the reduced geoeffectiveness of solar cycle 24: A moderate storm perspective, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2016, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 8188–8202. do 10.1002/2016JA022885Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shibaev, I. and Ishkov, V., Investigation of the statistical characteristics of Wolf numbers reliable series: Signs of solar cycles likelihood, Proc. 7th Scientific Conf. “Space, Ecology, Safety-2011”, Sofia, Bulgaria, Nov. 29–Dec. 1, 2011, 2012, pp. 297–301. http://www.space.bas.bg/BG/magasin/SES/PROCEEDING/20SES/202011.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vasil’eva, V.V. and Tlatov, A.G., Comparative analysis of the properties of coronal holes in cycle 24 of solar activity, in Trudy Pul’kovskoi konferentsii po fizike Solntsa. Solnechnaya i solnechno–zemnaya fizika-2015 (Proceedings of the Pulkovo Conference on Solar Physics: Solar and Solar–Terrestrial Physics-2015), Stepanov, A.V. and Nagovitsin, Yu.A., Eds., St. Petersburg: VVM, 2015, pp. 39–42.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, Y., Coronal holes and open magnetic flux, Space Sci. Rev., 2009, vol. 144, nos. 1–4, pp. 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radiowave Propagation, Russian Academy of SciencesTroitskMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations