Advertisement

Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 817–822 | Cite as

Contribution of Solar and Auroral Ionization of the Atmosphere to the E-Layer Critical Frequency of the Nighttime Auroral Region

  • M. G. Deminov
  • G. F. Deminova
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The contribution of the solar fsol and auroral favr components of foE to the critical frequency of the E layer foE are estimated based on an analysis of the medians of the E-layer critical frequency foE in the nighttime (2200–0200 LT) auroral region with allowance for the noncoincidence in the heights of maxima of these components. This noncoincidence is taken into account with a correction coefficient that manifests the relation of fsol to the critical frequency of the E layer due to solar radiation foEsol. The analytical dependence of this coefficient on the solar zenith angle for χ < 85° is derived. It is shown that one can usually disregard the contribution of fsol in foE in the nighttime auroral region for χ > 85° and approximately foE = foEavr for these conditions in which foEavr is the critical frequency of the E layer due to precipitation of auroral electrons. It is obtained that the allowance for the noncoincidence of the heights of maxima in the solar and auroral components of foE with estimation of the annual changes in foEavr based on the foE measurements leads to an increase in foEavr in summer and thus provides a decrease in the amplitude of the winter anomaly in foEavr. Nevertheless, even in this case, the amplitude of the winter anomaly in foEavr is higher than the winter anomaly in foE, and that demonstrates the important role of accelerated auroral electrons in formation of this anomaly.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The foE medians of ionospheric stations and the solar and geomagnetic activity indices were taken from the sites of Space Physics Interactive Data Resource (SPIDR, http://spidr.ngdc.noaa.gov/), World Data Center for Solar–Terrestrial Physics, Chilton (http:// www.ukssdc.ac.uk/wdcc1/), World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto (http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/). The work was partly supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-05-00427) and by Program 28 of the Presidium of RAS.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Badin, V.I., Deminov, M.G., Deminov, R.G., and Shubin, V.N., E-layer critical frequency median model for auroral region, Soln.-Zemnaya Fiz., 2013, no. 22, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bilitza, D., The International Reference Ionosphere—status 2013, Adv. Space Res., 2015, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1914–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bösinger, T., Hussey, G.C., Haldoupis, C., and Schlegel, K., Auroral E-region electron density height profile modification by electric field driven vertical plasma transport: Some evidence in EISCAT CP-1 data statistics, Ann. Geophys., 2004, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 901–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryunelli, B.E. and Namgaladze, A.A., Fizika ionosfery (Ionospheric Physics), Moscow: Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cliver, E.W., Kamide, Y., and Ling, A.G., The semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity: Phases and profiles for 130 years of aa data, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2002, vol. 64, pp. 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deminov, M.G. and Deminova, G.F., Winter anomaly of the E-layer critical frequency in the nighttime auroral zone, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2017, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 584–590.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deminov, M.G. and Deminova, G.F., Winter anomaly in the critical frequency of the E-layer in the nighttime polar cap, Geomagn. Aeron. (Engl. Transl.), 2018, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 62–69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, M.T. and Wygant, J.R., The correlation of plasma density distributions over 5000 km with solar illumination of the ionosphere: Solar cycle and zenith angle observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2003, vol. 30, no. 24, 2260. doi 10.1029/2003GL018175Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kashirin, A.I., Photoionization in the nocturnal ionosphere, Geomagn. Aeron., 1986, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 563–568.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morooka, M. and Mukai, T., Density as a controlling factor for seasonal and altitudinal variations of the auroral particle acceleration region, J. Geophys. Res., 2003, vol. 108, no. A7, 1306. doi 10.1029/2002JA009786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nava, B., Coisson, P., and Radicella, S.M., A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2008, vol. 70, no. 15, pp. 1856–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newell, P.T., Meng, C.-I., and Lyons, K.M., Suppression of discrete aurorae by sunlight, Nature, 1996, vol. 381, no. 6585, pp. 766–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newell, P.T., Sotirelis, T., and Wing, S., Seasonal variations in diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora, J. Geophys. Res., 2010, vol. 115, A03216. doi 10.1029/2009JA014805Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ohtani, S., Wing, S., Ueno, G., and Higuchi, T., Dependence of premidnight field-aligned currents and particle precipitation on solar illumination, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, A12205. doi 10.1029/2009JA014115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Picone, J.M., Hedin, A.E., Drob, D.P., and Aikin, A.C., NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, vol. 107A, pp. 1468–1483.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richards, P.G., Fennelly, J.A., and Torr, D.G., EUVAC: A solar EUV flux model for aeronomic calculations, J. Geophys. Res., 1994, vol. 99, pp. 8981–8992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheehan, C.H. and St.-Maurice, J.-P., Dissociative recombination of N2 +, O2 +, and NO+: Rate coefficients for ground state and vibrationally excited ions, J. Geophys. Res., 2004, vol. 109, no. A3, A00302. doi 10.1029/2003JA010132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tascione, T.F., Kroehl, H.W., Creiger, R., Freeman, J.W., Wolf, R.A., Spiro, R.W., and Hausman, B.A., New ionospheric and magnetospheric specification models, Radio Sci., 1988, vol. 23, pp. 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Titheridge, J.E., Re-modeling the ionospheric E region, Kleinheubacher Ber., 1996a, vol. 39, pp. 687–696.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Titheridge, J.E., Direct allowance for the effect of photoelectrons in ionospheric modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 1996b, vol. 101A, pp. 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ulich, Th., Turunen, E., and Nygren, T., Effective recombination coefficient in the lower ionosphere during bursts of auroral electrons, Adv. Space Res., 2000, vol. 25, pp. 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang, Z., Ssessanga, N., Tran, L.T., Bilitza, D., and Kenpankho, P., On improvement in representation of foE in IRI, Adv. Space Res., 2017, vol. 60, pp. 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, Y., Paxton, L.J., Bilitza, D., and Doe, R., Near real-time assimilation in IRI of auroral peak E-region density and equatorward boundary, Adv. Space Res., 2010, vol. 46, pp. 1055–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radiowave PropagationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations