Advertisement

Geochemistry International

, Volume 56, Issue 7, pp 628–650 | Cite as

Age and Geochemistry of the Cape Burks Gabbroids (Russkaya Station Area, West Antarctica)

  • D. A. Tkacheva
  • E. V. Mikhalsky
  • N. M. Sushchevskaya
  • E. L. Kunakkuzin
  • S. G. Skublov
  • S. A. Sergeev
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

The paper reports first geological, chemical, mineralogical, Sr–Nd chemical–isotope, and geochronological data on the gabbroid massif discovered on the Hobbs coast in the Cape Burks area, West Antarctica. The area is made up of compositionally diverse gabbroids that are intersected by thin vein and dike bodies of mafic, intermediate, and fesic composition. The gabbroids are represented by olivine and olivinefree gabbros and gabbronorites, with sharply subordinate troctolites, gabbro–anorthosites, and anorthosites. The U–Pb SHRIMP–II zircon age of the gabbroids and vein rocks was estimated at 100 ± 1 Ma. The gabbroids were supposedly emplaced in the upper crust in tectonically active conditions. The thickness of the pluton is no less than 2.5–3 km. The rocks were crystallized from a highly fractionated melt. Their composition was mainly determined by accumulation and fractional crystallization. The origin of vein felsic rocks was likely related to an evolved residual liquid. The igneous complex was formed in a within–plate geodynamic setting, and its primary melts were derived from a weakly LILE enriched lithospheric mantle.

Keywords

West Antarctica Marie Byrd Land gabbroids U–Pb age geodynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. B. Bayanova, Age of the Reference Geological Complexes of the Kola Region and Duration of Magmatic Processes (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. G. E. Grikurov, G. L. Leichenkov, and E. V. Mikhalsky, “Tectonic evolution of Antarctica in the light of the modern state of geodynamic ideas,” Contribution of Russia in the International Polar Year 2007/2008. Structure and Evolution of Lithosphere (Paulsen. Moscow, 2011), pp. 91–110 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. B. G. Lopatin, and M. M. Polyakov, Geology of the Marie Byrd Land and Eights Coast (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. A. A. Fedotova, and E. V. Bibikova, and S. G. Simakin, “Ion–microprobe zircon geochemistry as an indicator of mineral genesis during geochronological studies,” Geochem. Int. 46 (9), 912–927 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Barker and J. G. Arth, “Generation of trondhjemitictonalitic liquids and Archaean trondhjemite–basalt suites,” Geology 4, 596–600 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. E. A. Belousova, W. L. Griffin, et al. “Igneous zircon: trace element composition as a n indicator of source rock type,” Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 143, 602–622 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. L. P. Black, S. L. Kamo, C. M. Allen, J. N. Aleinikoff, D.W. Davis, R. J. Korsch, and C. Foudoulis, “TEMORA 1: a new zircon standard for U–Pb geochronology,” Chem. Geol. 200, 155–170 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Bouvier, J. D. Vervoort, and P. J. Patchett, “The Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 273 (1–2), 48–57 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Coogan, R. N. Wilson, et al. “Near–solidus evolution of oceanic gabbros: Insights from amphibole geochemistry,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65 (23), 4339–4357 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. K. G. Cox and C. J. Hawkesworth, “Geochemical stratigraphy of the Deccan Traps at Mahabaleshwar, Western Ghats, India, with implications for open system magmatic process,” J. Petrol. 26, 355–377 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geological Maps of Antarctica, Antarctic Map Folio Series, Ed. by C. Craddock, Am. Geograph. Soc., 12, XIX (1970).Google Scholar
  12. V. DiVenere D. V. Kent, and I. W. D. Dalziel, “Early Cretaceous paleomagnetic results from Maries Byrd Land, West Antarctica: implications for the Weddellia collage of crustal blocks,” J. Geophys. Res. 100, 8133–8151 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. S. Drummond, M. J. Defant, and P. K. Kepezhinskas, “Petrogenesis of slab–derived trondhjemite–tonalite–dacites/adakites magmas,” Trans. R. Soc. Edinb: Earth Sci. 87, 205–215 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. R. A. Duncan, P. R. Hooper, et al., “The timing and duration of the Karoo igneous event, southern Gondwana,” J. Geophys. Res. 102 (B8), 8127–8138.(1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Faure and T. Mensing, Isotopes: Principles and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005).Google Scholar
  16. V. A. Glebovitsky, I. S. Sedova, et al., “Geochemistry of zircons from ultrametamorphic granitoids in Junction Zone of Aldan Shield and Dzhugddzhur–Stanovoi Fold region,” Geol. Ore Deposits 54, 516–530 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. S. J. Goldstein and S. B. Jacobsen, “Nd and Sr isotopic systematics of river water suspended material implications for crystal evolution,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 87, 249–265 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. W.–L. Huang and P. J. Wyllie, “Phase relationships of gabbro–tonalite–granite–water at 15 kbar with applications to differentiation and anatexis,” Am. Mineral. 71, 301–316 (1986).Google Scholar
  19. J. Koepke, S. T. Feig, J. Snow, and M. Freisel, “Petrogenesis of oceanic plagiogranites by partial melting of gabbros: an experimental study,” Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 146, 414–432 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Jochum, D. Dingwell et al., “The preparation and preliminary characterisation of eight geological MPIDING reference glasses for in–site microanalysis,” Geostand. Newslett. J. Geostand. Geoanal. 24, 87–133 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. K. R. Ludwig, “SQUID 1 User’s manual,” Berkeley Geochronol. Center Sp. Publ., No. 2, (2000) 19 p.Google Scholar
  22. M. Meschede, “A method of discriminating between different types of mid–ocean ridge basalts and continental tholeiites with the Nb–Zr–Y diagram,” Chem. Geol. 56, 207–218 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. S. B. Mukasa and I. W. D. Dalziel, “Marie Byrd Land, West Antarctica: evolution of Gondwana’s Pacific margin constrained by zircon U–Pb geochronology and feldspar common–Pb isotopic compositions,” GSA Bull. 112 (4), 611–627 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. S. B. Mukasa, I. W. D. Dalziel, and R. J. Pankhurst, “U–Pb and Ar/Ar age constraints on the development and subsequent fragmentation of Gondwanaland’s Pacific margin, Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica,” EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 75, 692 (1994).Google Scholar
  25. E. D. Mullen, “MnO/TiO2/P2O5: a minor element discriminant for basaltic rocks of oceanic environments and its implications for petrogenesis,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 62, 53–62 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. D. G. Palais, S. B. Mukasa, and S. D. Weaver, “U–Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology for plutons along the Ruppert and Hobbs Coasts, Marie Byrd Land, West Antarctica: Evidence for rapid transition from arc to rift–related magmatism,” EOS 74 (16), 123 (1993).Google Scholar
  27. R. J. Pankhurst, S. D. Weaver, et al. “Geochronology and geochemistry of pre–Jurassic superterranes in Marie Byrd Land, Antarctica,” J. Geophys. Res. 103 (B2), 2529–2547.(1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. J. A. Pearce and J. R. Cann, “Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 19, 290–300 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. N. Rodionov, B. Belyatsky, A. V. Antonov, I. N. Kapitonov, and S. A. Sergeev, “Comparative in–situ U–Th–Pb geochronological and trace element composition of baddeleyite and low–U zircon from carbonatites of the Palaeozoic Kovdor alkaline–ultramafic complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia,” Gondwana Res. 21, 728–744 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. P. L. Roeder and R. F. Emslie, “Olivine–liquid equilibrium,” Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 29, 275–289 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. C. S. Siddoway “Tectonics of the West Antarctic rift system: new light on the history and dynamics of distributed intracontinental extension,” in Antarctica: A Keystone in a Changing World. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Antarctic Earth Sciences, Ed. by A. K. Cooper, P. J. Barrett, et al., (The National Academies Press, Washington, 2008), pp. 91–114.Google Scholar
  32. A. V. Sobolev, A. W. Hofmann, et al., “The amount of recycled crust in sources of mantle–derived melts,” Science 316, 412–417 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. B. C. Storey, P. T. Leat, et al., “Mantle plumes and Antarctica–New Zealand rifting: evidence from mid–Cretaceous mafic dykes,” J. Geol. Soc. 156, 659–671 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. S.–S. Sun and W. F. McDonough, “Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes,” Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, Ed. by A. D. Saunders and M. J. Norry, Geol. Soc. Sp. Publ. 42, 313–345 (1989).Google Scholar
  35. E. B. Watson, D. A. Wark, and J. B. Thomas, “Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile,” Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 151, 413–433 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. S. D. Weaver, B. C. Storey, et al., “Antarctica–New Zealand rifting and Marie Byrd Land lithospheric magmatism linked to ridge subduction and mantle plume activity,” Geology 22, 811–814 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. D. Weis, F. A. Frey, et al., “Trace of the Kerguelen mantle plume: evidence from seamounts between the Kerguelen Archipelago and Heard Island, Indian Ocean,” Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 3 (6) (2002).Google Scholar
  38. M. Wilson, Igneous Petrogenesis: a Global Tectonic Approach (Springer, 2007).Google Scholar
  39. D. A. Wood, “The application of a Th–Hf–Ta diagram to problems of tectonomagmatic classification and to establishing the nature of crustal contamination of basaltic lavas of the British Tertiary volcanic province,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 50, 11–30 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. A. Tkacheva
    • 1
  • E. V. Mikhalsky
    • 1
  • N. M. Sushchevskaya
    • 2
  • E. L. Kunakkuzin
    • 3
  • S. G. Skublov
    • 4
    • 5
  • S. A. Sergeev
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Gramberg All-Russia Research Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources of the World OceanSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical ChemistryRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Geological Institute, Kola Science CentreRussian Academy of ScienceApatity, Murmansk. obl.Russia
  4. 4.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  5. 5.St. Petersburg Mining UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  6. 6.Earth’s Science InstituteSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  7. 7.Karpinskii All-Russia Research Institute of GeologySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations