Cosmic Research

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 18–28 | Cite as

Large-Scale and Small-Scale Solar Wind Structures Formed during Interaction of Streams in the Heliosphere

  • D. G. RodkinEmail author
  • K. B. Kaportseva
  • A. T. Lukashenko
  • I. S. Veselovsky
  • V. A. Slemzin
  • Yu. S. Shugay


The paper considers the classification of solar wind streams in magnetohydrodynamic parameters (MHD-types); combinations of proton speed, density, temperature, and magnetic field strength, in addition to the classical solar wind separation into high-speed streams from coronal holes, transient streams of coronal mass ejections, and the slow solar wind from the streamer belt. Two classifications of solar wind properties were compared for the events in August 2010 and May 2011, when one could observe the interaction of two coronal mass ejections and a coronal mass ejection with a high-speed solar wind stream from the coronal hole, respectively. It is shown that the classical description of a large-scale structure of wind streams (the ion wind composition especially) in scales of hours and days allows one to determine the type and source of streams, whereas the MHD-parameters allow one to more accurately describe the small-scale structure (in minutes), especially in the cases of several streams interaction in the heliosphere. The detailed study of a small-scale structure of stream interaction regions provides the information required for developing MHD-models describing the processes of propagation and interaction of streams in the heliosphere and for predicting their geoefficiency.



The authors express their deep gratitude to the research teams of SDO/AIA, SDO/HMI, ACE and OMNIWeb for providing access to the data.


  1. 1.
    Parker, E.N., Interplanetary Dynamical Processes, New York: Interscience, 1963; Moscow: Mir, 1965.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V., Near-Earth solar wind flows and related geomagnetic activity during more than four solar cycles (1963–2011), J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2012, vol. 2, A02.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feldman, U., Landi, E., and Schwadron, N.A., On the sources of fast and slow solar wind, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2005, vol. 110, A07109.ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu, F. and Borovsky, J.E., A new four-plasma categorization scheme for the solar wind, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2015, vol. 120, pp. 70–100.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cane, H.V. and Richardson, I.G., Interplanetary coronal mass ejections in the near-Earth solar wind during 1996–2002, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2003, vol. 108, 1156.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galvin, A.B., Popecki, M.A., Simunac, K.D.C., et al., Solar wind ion trends and signatures: STEREO PLASTIC observations approaching solar minimum, Ann. Geophys., 2009, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 3909–3922.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richardson, I.G. and Cane, H.V., Near-Earth interplanetary coronal mass ejections during solar cycle 23 (1996–2009): Catalog and summary of properties, Sol. Phys., 2010, vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 189–237.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mason, G.M., Desai, M.I., and Li, G., Solar cycle abundance variations in corotating interaction regions: Evidence for a suprathermal ion seed population, Astrophys. J. Lett., 2012, vol.748, no. 2, L31.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gopalswamy, N., Mäkelä, P., Akiyama, S., Xie, H., Yashiro, S., and Reinard, A.A., The solar connection of enhanced heavy ion charge states in the interplanetary medium: Implications for the flux-rope structure of CMEs, Sol. Phys., 2013, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. 17–46.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yermolaev, Yu.I., Nikolaeva, N.S., Lodkina, I.G., and Yermolaev, M.Yu., Relative occurrence rate and geoeffectiveness of large-scale types of the solar wind, Cosmic Res., 2010, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–30.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hundhausen, A.J., Coronal Expansion and Solar Wind, Berlin: Springer, 1972; Moscow: Mir, 1976.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mullan, D.J., Sources of the solar wind: What are the smallest-scale structures?, Astron. Astrophys., 1990, vol. 232, no. 2, pp. 520–535.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tu, C.Y. and Marsch, E., MHD structures, waves and turbulence in the solar wind: Observations and theories, Space Sci. Rev., 1995, vol. 73, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–210.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Cagaš, P., Přech, L., Pavlů, J., Zastenker, G.N., Riazantseva, M.O., and Koloskova, I.V., Short-scale variations of the solar wind helium abundance, Astrophys. J., 2013, vol. 778, no. 1, id 25.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zastenker, G.N., Koloskova, I.V., Ryazantseva, M.O., Yurasov, A.S., Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., and Cagaš, P., Observation of fast variations of the helium-ion abundance in the solar wind, Cosmic Res., 2014, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hundhausen, A.J., Gilbert, H.E., and Bame, S.J., Ionization state of the interplanetary plasma, J. Geophys. Res., 1968, vol. 73, no. 17, p. 5485.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burlaga, L.F., Plunkett, S.P., and St. Cyr, O.C., Successive CMEs and complex ejecta, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2002, vol. 107, no. A10, pp. SSH-1-1–SSH-1-12.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burlaga, L., Berdichevsky, D., Gopalswamy, N., Lepping, R., and Zurbuchen, T., Merged interaction regions at 1 AU, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2003, vol. 108, no. A12, 1425.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rouillard, A.P., Lavraud, B., Sheeley, N.R., Davies, J.A., Burlaga, L.F., Savani, N.P., Jacquey, C., and Forsyth, R.J., White light and in situ comparison of a forming merged interaction region, Astrophys. J., 2010, vol. 719, no. 2, pp. 1385–1392.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, Y.D., Luhmann, J.G., Mostl, C., Martinez-Oliveros, J.C., Bale, S.D., Lin, R.P., Harrison, R.A., Temmer, M., Webb, D.F., and Odstrcil, D., Interactions between coronal mass ejections viewed in coordinated imaging and in situ observations, Astrophys. J. Lett., 2012, vol. 746, no. 2, id L15.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, Y.D., Yang, Z., Wang, R., Luhmann, J.G., Richardson, J.D., and Lugaz, N., Sun-to-Earth characteristics of two coronal mass ejections interacting near 1 AU: Formation of a complex ejecta and generation of a two-step geomagnetic storm, Astrophys. J. Lett., 2014, vol. 793, no. 2, id L41.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Temmer, M., Vršnak, B., Rollett, T., Bein, B., de Koning, C.A., Liu, Y., Bosman, E., Davies, J.A., Möstl, C., Žic, T., Veronig, A.M., Bothmer, V., Harrison, R., Nitta, N., Bisi, M., Flor, O., Eastwood, J., Odstrcil, D., and Forsyth, R., Characteristics of kinematics of a coronal mass ejection during the 2010 August 1 CME–CME interaction event, Astrophys. J., 2012, vol. 749, no. 1, Р. 57.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodkin, D., Zhukov, A.N., Goryaev, G., Slemzin, V., Shugay, Y., and Veselovsky, I., Single ICMEs and complex transient structures in the solar wind in 2010–2011, Sol. Phys., 2018, vol. 293, no. 5, id 78.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pagano, P., Reale, F., Orlando, S., and Peres, G., MHD evolution of a fragment of a CME core in the outer solar corona, Astron. Astrophys., 2007, vol. 464, pp. 753–760.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pagano, P., Mackay, D.H., and Poedts, S., Magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the ejection of a magnetic flux rope, Astron. Astrophys., 2013, vol. 554, id A77.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wold, A.M., Mays, M.L., Taktakishvili, A., et al., Verification of real-time WSA-ENLIL+Cone simulations of CME arrival-time at the CCMC from 2010 to 2016, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2018, vol. 8, A17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yermolaev, Yu.I., Nikolaeva, N.S., Lodkina, I.G., and Yermolaev, M.Yu., Catalog of large-scale solar wind phenomena during 1976–2000, Cosmic Res., 2009, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 81–94.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dmitriev, A.V., Suvorova, A.V., and Veselovsky, I.S., Statistical characteristics of the heliospheric plasma and magnetic field at the Earth’s orbit during four solar cycles 20–23, in Handbook on Solar Wind: Effects, Dynamics and Interactions, Johannson, H.E., Ed., New York: Nova Science, 2009, pp. 81–144.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vršnak, B., Žic., T., Vrbanec, D., et al., Propagation of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: The drag-based model, Sol. Phys., 2013, vol. 285, nos. 1–2, pp. 295–315.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mays, M.L., Taktakishvili, A., Pulkkinen, A., et al., Ensemble modeling of CMEs using the WSA-ENLIL+Cone model, Sol. Phys., 2015, vol. 290, no. 6, pp. 1775–1814.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Rodkin
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. B. Kaportseva
    • 2
  • A. T. Lukashenko
    • 3
  • I. S. Veselovsky
    • 3
    • 4
  • V. A. Slemzin
    • 1
  • Yu. S. Shugay
    • 3
  1. 1.Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations