Advertisement

Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 80, Issue 9, pp 1704–1716 | Cite as

Synthesis of a Multifunctional Tracking System in Conditions of Uncertainty

  • D. V. KrasnovEmail author
  • A. V. UtkinEmail author
Large Scale Systems Control
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Class of affine nonlinear single-input single-output systems, where the relative degree of the equivalent form of the input-output is invariant to the presence of external, unmatched disturbances, is formalized. Methods of synthesis of a multifunctional tracking system in the conditions of parametric uncertainty of the control plant model and incomplete measurements are designed for this class of systems. The original method of synthesis of a low dimension observer for estimating mixed variables (these are combinations of state variables, external influences and their derivatives) by measuring only tracking error is designed for information support of discontinuous control. In this observer, using the linear corrective effects with saturation, the method of separating the movements of observation errors is realized. As an illustration of the developed method, an electromechanical control object is considered-an inverted pendulum controlled by a DC motor. The simulation results for the worst case of varying parameters are given.

Keywords

nonlinear affine single-input single-output systems tracking discontinuous control state observer invariance decomposition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 15-08-01543A, and Presidential Grant MD-5336.2016.8.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreev, Yu.P., Upravlenie konechnomernymi lineinymi ob'ektami (Control for Finite-Dimensional Linear Objects), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akhobadze, A.G. and Krasnova, S.A., Solving the Tracking Problem under Uncertainty Based on a Joint Block-Canonical Form of Controllability and Observability, Upravlen. Bol'shimi Sist., 2009, no. 24, pp. 34–80.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bobtsov, A.A., Kolyubin, S.A., and Pyrkin, A.A., Stabilization of a Nonlinear Plant with Input Delay and Sinusoidal Perturbation, Autom. Remote Control, 2015, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 16–23.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emel'yanov, S.V. and Korovin, S.K., Novye tipy obratnoi svyazi (New Types of Feedback), Moscow: Nauka, 1997Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krasnova, S.A. and Kuznetsov, S.I., Uncontrollable Perturbations of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems: Estimation on Moving Modes, Autom. Remote Control, 2005, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1580–1593.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krasnova, S.A. and Mysik, N.S., Cascade Synthesis of a State Observer with Nonlinear Correction Influences, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 263–280.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krasnova, S.A. and Utkin, A.V., Sigma Function in Observer Design for States and Perturbations, Autom. Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1676–1688.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krasnova, S.A. and Utkin, A.V., Analysis and Synthesis of Minimum Phase Nonlinear SISO Systems under External Unmatched Perturbations, Autom. Remote Control, 2016, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1665–1675.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krasnov, D.V., Rassadin, Yu.M., and Shinkaryuk, A.G., Implementation of the Method of Separation of Motions in the Problems of Observation, Proc. XIII All-Russian School-Conf. of Young Scientists “Control of Large Systems” CLS'2016, Samara, 2016, Moscow: Inst. Probl. Upravlen., 2016, pp. 121–133.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miroshnik, I.V., Nikiforov, V.O., and Fradkov, A.V., Nelineinoe i adaptivnoe upravlenie slozhnymi dinamicheskimi sistemami (Nonlinear Adaptive Control for Complex Dynamic Systems), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2000.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nikiforov, V.O., Adaptivnoe i robastnoe upravlenie s kompensatsiei vozmushchenii (Adaptive and Robust Control with Perturbation Compensation), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wonham, W.M., Linear Multivariable Control: A Geometric Approach, New York: Springer, 1979. Translated under the title Linei'nye mnogomernye sistemy upravleniya: geometricheskii podkhod, Moscow: Nauka, 1980.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Utkin, V.I., Skol'zyashchie rezhimi v zadachakh upravleniya i optimizatsii (Moving States in Control and Optimization), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Utkin, V.A. and Utkin, A.V., Problem of Tracking in Linear Systems with Parametric Uncertainties under Unstable Zero Dynamics, Autom. Remote Control, 2014, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1577–1592.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Angeli, D., Almost Global Stabilization of the Inverted Pendulum via Continuous State Feedback, Automatica, 2001, vol. 37, pp. 1103–1108.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Isidori, A., Nonlinear Control Systems, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khalil, H.K. and Praly, L., High-Gain Observers in Nonlinear Feedback Control, Int. J. Robust Nonlin. Control, 2014, vol. 24, pp. 993–1015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kvaternik, K. and Lynch, A.F., Global Tracking via Output Feedback for Nonlinear MIMO Systems, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 2011, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2179–2184.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teel, A.R., A Nonlinear Small Gain Theorem for the Analysis of Control Systems with Saturation, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 1996, no. 41, pp. 1256–1270.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trapeznikov Institute of Control SciencesRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations