Automation and Remote Control

, Volume 80, Issue 9, pp 1574–1590 | Cite as

Bounded Perturbations of Nonlinear Discrete Systems: Estimation of Impact and Minimization

  • V. M. KuntsevichEmail author
Topical Issue


The problem of minimizing the impact of bounded perturbations on certain classes of controlled nonlinear discrete systems is solved. The radius of the invariant set, an analog of variance for the perturbations of probabilistic nature, is taken as a measure of the impact. The cases of two-sided linear and nonlinear constraints that form multivalued mappings and also the case in which the nonlinear function has a given estimate of the norm are considered.


robust control nonlinear discrete systems bounded perturbations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Polyak, B.T., Khlebnikov, M.V., and Shcherbakov, P.S., Upravlenie lineinymi sistemami pri vneshnikh vozmushcheniyakh: tekhnika lineinykh matrichnykh neravenstv (Control of Linear Systems with External Perturbations: The Technique of Linear Matrix Inequalities), Moscow: LENAND, 2014.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mazko, A.G., Robastnaya ustoichivost’ i stabilizatsiya dinamicheskikh sistem. Metody matrichnykh i konusnykh neravenstv (Robust Stability and Stabilization of Dynamic Systems. The Methods of Matrix and Cone Inequalities), Kiev: Inst. of Mathematics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mazko, A.G., Cone Inequalities and Stability of Dynamical Systems, Nonlinear Dynam. Syst. Theory, 2011, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 303–318.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vandergraft, J.S., Spectral Properties of Matrices Which Have Invariant Cones, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1968, vol. 16, pp. 1208–1222.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lur’e, A.I. and Postnikov, V.N., Towards Stability Theory of Controlled Systems, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1944, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 246–248.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aizerman, M.A., On a Problem Concerning the Global Stability of Dynamic Systems, Usp. Mat. Nauk, 1949, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 186–188.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leonov, G.A. and Kuznetsov, N.V., Latent Oscillations in Dynamic Systems: Hilbert’s 16th Problem, Aizerman’s and Kalman’s Hypotheses, Latent Attractors in Chua’s Circuits, Tr. 6 Mezhd. konf. po differentsial’nym i funktsional’no-differentsial’nym uravneniyam (Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Differential and Functional-Differential Equations), Moscow, August 14–21, 2011, Part 1, 45, Moscow: Ross. Univ. Druzhby Narodov, 2012, pp. 105–121.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuntsevich, V.M. and Kurzhanskii, A.B., Reachability Domains of Linear and Some Nonlinear Discrete Systems: Description and Control, Probl. Upravlen. Inform., 2010, no. 1, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuntsevich, V.M., Control of a Family of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems under Measurements with Bounded Disturbances, Tr. Inst. Mat. Mekh. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2014, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 178–186.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tsypkin, Ya.Z. and Polyak, B.T., Robust Stability of Linear Systems, Itogi Nauki Tekh., Ser. Tekh. Kibern., 1991, no. 32, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuntsevich, A.V. and Kuntsevich, V.M., Stability in Nonlinear Difference Inclusions, Kibern. Sist. Analiz, 2010, no. 5, pp. 11–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Space Research InstituteNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations