Advertisement

Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics

, Volume 54, Issue 11, pp 1595–1603 | Cite as

Earth’s Free Oscillations Excited by the 2013 Okhotsk Sea Earthquake

  • V. K. MilyukovEmail author
  • M. P. VinogradovEmail author
  • A. P. MironovEmail author
  • A. V. MyasnikovEmail author
Article

Abstract

Based on the deformation data measured by the Baksan laser interferometer-strainmeter, Earth’s free oscillations (EFO) excited by the Okhotsk Sea deep-focus earthquake of May 24, 2013, the largest recorded deep-focus earthquake, are analyzed. The periods of 50 fundamental modes of EFO in the range 1.2–5.0 mHz are determined with an error of 3–12 μHz. The comparison of the EFO spectra for the May 24, 2013, Okhotsk Sea deep-focus earthquake the November 15, 2006, Simushir shallow-focus earthquake revealed a number of features of EFO excitation by the deep-focus earthquake. It is found that more overtones (both spheroidal and toroidal) are observed for the deep-focus earthquake. The amplitude values ​​of the observed EFO modes for the deep-focus earthquake are greater than for the shallow-focus earthquake, with a smaller observed deformation. The presence of interacting spheroidal and toroidal modes being close in frequency (coupling effect) is revealed. A method is proposed that can obtain an estimate of the EFO modes, which are not observed explicitly in the spectrum, from the beat period between close frequencies. Application of the method to the deformation data made it possible to find the frequencies of nine pairs of close EFO modes.

Keywords:

Earth’s free oscillations deep-focus earthquake deformation 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 16-05-00122).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Aki, K. and Richards, P., Quantitative Seismology, Univ. Sci. Books, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chebrova, A.Yu., Chebrov, V.N., Gusev, A.A., Lander, A.V., Guseva, E.M., Mityushkina, S.V., and Raevskaya, A.A., The impacts of the M W 8.3 Sea of Okhotsk earthquake of May 24, 2013 in Kamchatka and worldwide, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2015, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahlen, F. and Tromp, J., Theoretical Global Seismology, Princeton; New Jersey: Princeton Univ. Press, 1998. Global Centroid Moment Tensor Project. http://www. globalcmt.org/CMTsearch.html.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green II, H.W. and Burnley, P.C., A new self-organizing mechanism for deep-focus earthquakes, Nature, 1989, vol. 341, pp. 733–737. doi 10.1038/341733a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green II, H.W. and Houston, H., The mechanics of deep earthquakes, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 1995, vol. 23, pp. 169–214. doi 10.1146/annurev.ea.23.050195.001125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houston, H., 4.13-deep earthquakes, in Treatise on Geophysics, Schubert, G., Ed., Oxford: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 329–354. doi 10.1016/B978-0-444-53802-4.00079-8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanamori, H., Anderson, D.L., and Heaton, T.H., Frictional melting during the rupture of the 1994 Bolivian earthquake, Science, 1998, vol. 279, no. 5352, pp. 839–842. doi 10.1126/science.279.5352.839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karato, S.-I., Riedel, M.R., and Yuen, D.A., Rheological structure and deformation of subducted slabs in the mantle transition zone: Implications for mantle circulation and deep earthquakes, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 2001, vol. 127, nos. 1–4, pp. 83–108. doi 10.1016/ S0031-9201(01)00223-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kikuchi, M. and Kanamori, H., The mechanism of the deep Bolivia earthquake of June 9, 1994, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1994, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 2341–2344. doi 10.1029/94GL02483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kirby, S.H., Okal, E.A., and Engdahl, E.R., The 9 June 94 Bolivian deep earthquake: An exceptional event in an extraordinary subduction zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1995, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 2233–2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirby, S.H., Stein, S., Okal, E.A., and Rubie, D.C., Metastable mantle phase transformations and deep earthquakes in subducting oceanic lithosphere, Rev. Geophys., 1996, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 261–306. doi 10.1029/ 96RG01050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masters G., Park J., Gilbert F. Observations of coupled spheroidal and toroidal modes, J. Geophys. Res., Solid Earth, 1983, vol. 88, no. B12, pp. 10285–10298. doi 10.1029/JB088iB12p10285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meade, C. and Jeanloz, R., Deep-focus earthquakes and recycling of water into the Earth’s mantle, Science, 1991, vol. 252, no. 5002, pp. 68–72. doi 10.1126/science.252.5002.68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Milyukov, V.K., Observation of the fine structure of the fundamental spheroidal mode 0S2, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2005, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 267–272.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Milyukov, V.K., Vinogradov, M.P., Mironov, A.P., Myasnikov, A.V., and Perelygin, N.A., The free oscillations of the earth excited by three strongest earthquakes of the past decade according to deformation observations, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogawa, M., Shear instability in a viscoelastic material as the cause of deep focus earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1987, vol. 92, no. B13, pp. 13 801–13 810. doi 10.1029/JB092iB13p13801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, J., Synthetic seismograms from coupled free oscillations: The effects of lateral structure and rotation, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1986, vol. 91, no. B6, pp. 6441–6464. doi 10.1029/JB091iB06p06441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raevskaya, A.A., Influence of the Sea of Okhotsk earthquake of May 24, 2013 (M w = 8.3) on the territory of Kamchatka and the world, Vulkanol. Seismol., 2015, no. 4, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogozhin, E.A. and Levina, V.I., The Simushir earthquakes of November 15, 2006 (I) and January 13, 2007 (II) with M w = 8.3 and M w = 8.1 (Middle Kuril Islands), Zemletryaseniya Severnoi Evrazii, 2007 god (The Earthquakes in Northern Eurasia for 2007), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2013, pp. 326–338.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rogozhin, E.A., Zav’yalov, A.D., and Zaitseva, N.V., Macroseismic manifestations of the Sea of Okhotsk earthquake of May 24, 2013 on the territory of Moscow, Vopr. Inzh. Seismol., 2013, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 64–77.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romanowicz, B. and Roult, G., First-order asymptotics for the eigenfrequencies of the Earth and application to the retrieval of large-scale lateral variations of structure, Geophys. J. Int., 1986, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 209–239. doi 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb04554.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silver, P.G., Beck, S.L., Wallace, T.C., Meade, C., Myers, S.C., James, D.E., and Kuehnel, R., Rupture deep-focus earthquakes, Science, 1995, vol. 268, no. 5207, pp. 69–73. doi 10.1126/science.268.5207.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tatevosyan, R.E., Kosarev, G.L., Bykova, V.V., Matsievskii, S.A., Ulomov, I.V., Aptekman, Zh.Ya., and Vakarchuk, R.N., A deep-focus earthquake with M w = 8.3 felt at a distance of 6500 km, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    U.S. Geological Survey, USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, M 8.3 Sea of Okhotsk. http://earthquake.usgs. gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000h4jh#summary.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ye, L., Lay, T., Kanamori, H., and Koper, K., Energy release of the 2013 M w 8.3 Sea of Okhotsk earthquake and deep slab stress heterogeneity, Science, 2013, vol. 341, no. 6152, pp. 1380–1384. doi 10.1126/science.1242032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhan, Zh., Kanamori, H., Tsai, V., Helmberger, D., and Wei, Sh., Rupture complexity of the 1994 Bolivia and 2013 Sea of Okhotsk deep earthquakes, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2014, vol. 385, pp. 89–96. doi 10.1016/ j.epsl.2013.10.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sternberg State Astronomical Institute, Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Vladikavkaz Science Center of the Russian Academy of SciencesVladikavkazRussia

Personalised recommendations