Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of the coordinate-exchange algorithm in constructing exact optimal discrete choice experiments

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) for modeling real marketplace choices, in both fundamental and applied research, has gained much attention recently. To improve the quality of designing DCEs, most researchers have drawn on optimal design theory. Because of the nonlinearity of the probabilistic choice models, to construct a proper choice design, one needs the help of efficient search algorithms, among which the coordinate-exchange algorithm (CEA) has shown itself to work very well under the widely used multinomial logit discrete choice model. However, due to the discrete nature of the choice design, there are no computationally feasible ways to verify that the resulting design is indeed optimal or efficient. In this article, an approach of evaluating the performance of the CEA for Bayesian optimal designs is proposed. This approach gives a lower bound of the efficiency of the resulting design under the continuous/approximate optimal design framework where well-established mathematical tools and theories can be modified and utilized. Empirical studies show that the CEA is highly efficient for deriving homogeneous optimal designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. A., and J. B. Wiley. 1992. Efficient choice set designs for estimating cross-effects models. Marketing Letters 3 (4):357–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biedermann, S., and M. Yang. 2016. Numerical construction of parameter robust optimal designs: A new efficient algorithm. In preparation. Bunch, D. S., J. J. Louviere, and D. A. Anderson. 1996. A comparison of experimental design strategies for multinomial logit models: The case of generic attributes. University of California Davis Graduate School of Management Working Paper, 11–96. Davis, CA.

  • Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2003. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Economics 12 (4):281–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R. D., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 1980. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics 22 (3):315–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorov, V. V. 1972. Theory of optimal experiments. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graßhoff, U., H. Großmann, H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2004. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126 (1):361–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gotwalt, C. M., B. Jones, and D. M. Steinberg. 2009. Fast computation of designs robust to parameter uncertainty for nonlinear settings. Technometrics 51 (1):88–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. 1974. On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research 1 (2):61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, H., H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2002. Advances in optimum experimental design for conjoint analysis and discrete choice models. Advances in Econometrics 16:93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., and K. Zwerina. 1996. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 33 (3):307–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, R., P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2006. A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3):409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2009. An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 27 (2):279–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2011. The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 27 (3):173–88.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, J. 1974. General equivalence theory for optimum designs (approximate theory). Annals of Statistics 2:849–79.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhfeld, W. F., M. Garratt, and R. D. Tobias. 1994. Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (4):545–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhfeld, W. F., and R. D. Tobias. 2005. Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications. Technometrics 47 (2):132–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lazari, A. G., and D. A. Anderson. 1994. Designs of discrete choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (3):375–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., C. J. Nachtsheim, K. Wang, R. Reul, and M. Albrecht. 2013. Conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments for quality improvement. Journal of Quality Technology 45 (1):74–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., and N. Arora. 2011. Efficient choice designs for a consider-then-choose model. Marketing Science 30 (2):321–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., and Y. Tang. 2015. Construction of heterogeneous conjoint choice designs: A new approach. Marketing Science 34 (3):346–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in economics, ed. P. Zarembka, 105–42. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 1995. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics 37 (1):60–69.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2001. Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (4):430–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2002. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science 21 (4):455–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2005. Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 42 (2):210–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvey, S. D., D. M. Titterington, and B. Torsney. 1978. An algorithm for optimal designs on a finite design space. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 14 (7):1379–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, I. H., and S. Joe. 1994. Lattice methods for multiple integration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, H. P. 1970. The sequential generation of D-optimal experimental designs. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41 (5):1655–64.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., S. Biedermann, and E. Tang. 2013. On optimal designs for nonlinear models: A general and efficient algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (504):1411–20.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2009. Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity. Marketing Science 28 (1):122–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y. 2011. D-optimal designs via a cocktail algorithm. Statistics and Computing 21 (4):475–81.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zwerina, K., J. Huber, and W. F. Kuhfeld. 2005. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs (updated version). SAS Technical Document TS-722E. https://doi.org/support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010e.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, T., Yang, M. Efficiency of the coordinate-exchange algorithm in constructing exact optimal discrete choice experiments. J Stat Theory Pract 11, 254–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2016.1203842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2016.1203842

Keywords

AMS Subject Classification

Navigation