Abstract
The use of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) for modeling real marketplace choices, in both fundamental and applied research, has gained much attention recently. To improve the quality of designing DCEs, most researchers have drawn on optimal design theory. Because of the nonlinearity of the probabilistic choice models, to construct a proper choice design, one needs the help of efficient search algorithms, among which the coordinate-exchange algorithm (CEA) has shown itself to work very well under the widely used multinomial logit discrete choice model. However, due to the discrete nature of the choice design, there are no computationally feasible ways to verify that the resulting design is indeed optimal or efficient. In this article, an approach of evaluating the performance of the CEA for Bayesian optimal designs is proposed. This approach gives a lower bound of the efficiency of the resulting design under the continuous/approximate optimal design framework where well-established mathematical tools and theories can be modified and utilized. Empirical studies show that the CEA is highly efficient for deriving homogeneous optimal designs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, D. A., and J. B. Wiley. 1992. Efficient choice set designs for estimating cross-effects models. Marketing Letters 3 (4):357–70.
Biedermann, S., and M. Yang. 2016. Numerical construction of parameter robust optimal designs: A new efficient algorithm. In preparation. Bunch, D. S., J. J. Louviere, and D. A. Anderson. 1996. A comparison of experimental design strategies for multinomial logit models: The case of generic attributes. University of California Davis Graduate School of Management Working Paper, 11–96. Davis, CA.
Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2003. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Economics 12 (4):281–94.
Cook, R. D., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 1980. A comparison of algorithms for constructing exact D-optimal designs. Technometrics 22 (3):315–24.
Fedorov, V. V. 1972. Theory of optimal experiments. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Graßhoff, U., H. Großmann, H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2004. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126 (1):361–76.
Gotwalt, C. M., B. Jones, and D. M. Steinberg. 2009. Fast computation of designs robust to parameter uncertainty for nonlinear settings. Technometrics 51 (1):88–95.
Green, P. E. 1974. On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research 1 (2):61–68.
Grossmann, H., H. Holling, and R. Schwabe. 2002. Advances in optimum experimental design for conjoint analysis and discrete choice models. Advances in Econometrics 16:93–118.
Huber, J., and K. Zwerina. 1996. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 33 (3):307–17.
Kessels, R., P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2006. A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3):409–19.
Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2009. An efficient algorithm for constructing Bayesian optimal choice designs. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 27 (2):279–91.
Kessels, R., B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2011. The usefulness of Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 27 (3):173–88.
Kiefer, J. 1974. General equivalence theory for optimum designs (approximate theory). Annals of Statistics 2:849–79.
Kuhfeld, W. F., M. Garratt, and R. D. Tobias. 1994. Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (4):545–57.
Kuhfeld, W. F., and R. D. Tobias. 2005. Large factorial designs for product engineering and marketing research applications. Technometrics 47 (2):132–41.
Lazari, A. G., and D. A. Anderson. 1994. Designs of discrete choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects. Journal of Marketing Research 31 (3):375–83.
Li, W., C. J. Nachtsheim, K. Wang, R. Reul, and M. Albrecht. 2013. Conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments for quality improvement. Journal of Quality Technology 45 (1):74–99.
Liu, Q., and N. Arora. 2011. Efficient choice designs for a consider-then-choose model. Marketing Science 30 (2):321–38.
Liu, Q., and Y. Tang. 2015. Construction of heterogeneous conjoint choice designs: A new approach. Marketing Science 34 (3):346–66.
McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in economics, ed. P. Zarembka, 105–42. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Meyer, R. K., and C. J. Nachtsheim. 1995. The coordinate-exchange algorithm for constructing exact optimal experimental designs. Technometrics 37 (1):60–69.
Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2001. Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (4):430–44.
Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2002. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Science 21 (4):455–75.
Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2005. Heterogeneous conjoint choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research 42 (2):210–18.
Silvey, S. D., D. M. Titterington, and B. Torsney. 1978. An algorithm for optimal designs on a finite design space. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 14 (7):1379–89.
Sloan, I. H., and S. Joe. 1994. Lattice methods for multiple integration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wynn, H. P. 1970. The sequential generation of D-optimal experimental designs. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41 (5):1655–64.
Yang, M., S. Biedermann, and E. Tang. 2013. On optimal designs for nonlinear models: A general and efficient algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association 108 (504):1411–20.
Yu, J., P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek. 2009. Efficient conjoint choice designs in the presence of respondent heterogeneity. Marketing Science 28 (1):122–35.
Yu, Y. 2011. D-optimal designs via a cocktail algorithm. Statistics and Computing 21 (4):475–81.
Zwerina, K., J. Huber, and W. F. Kuhfeld. 2005. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs (updated version). SAS Technical Document TS-722E. https://doi.org/support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010e.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, T., Yang, M. Efficiency of the coordinate-exchange algorithm in constructing exact optimal discrete choice experiments. J Stat Theory Pract 11, 254–268 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2016.1203842
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2016.1203842