Skip to main content
Log in

Generalised Smooth Tests for the Generalised Pareto Distribution

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The generalised Pareto distribution (GPD) is often used to model extreme values. New smooth tests of goodness of fit are proposed for this distribution. Typical problems with the GPD are that not all moments exist and not all classical estimation procedures work well over the whole parameter space. The generalised smooth test has good powers within a subset of the parameter space for which other tests may not be defined or appropriate, and, conversely, the Anderson-Darling test performs well when the test proposed here does not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, J.E., 1982. Goodness-of-fit tests for exponentiality based on loss-of-memory type functional equation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 6(3), 241–251.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Boos, D.D., 1992. On generalized score tests. The American Statistician, 46(4), 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E., Hadi, A.S., 1997. Fitting the generalized Pareto distribution to data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(440), 1609–1620.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choulakian, V., Stephens, M.A., 2001. Goodness-of-fit for the generalised Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 43(4), 478–484.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya, R.C., Gurland, J., 1972. Goodness of fit tests for the gamma and exponential distributions. Techno-metrics, 14(3), 791–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, D.J., Tsao, M., 1998. A hybrid estimator for generalized Pareto and extreme-value distributions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 27(4), 925–941.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, S.D., 1993. Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 35(2), 185–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W.J., Mathiason, D.J., 1990. On large-sample estimation and testing in parametric models. International Statistical Review, 58, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, N., Klar, B., 1996. Properly rescaled components of smooth tests of fit are diagnostic. Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 61–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1987. Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 29(3), 339–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klar, B., 2000. Diagnostic smooth tests of fit. Metrika, 52, 237–252.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kopecky, K.J., Pierce, D.A., 1979. Efficiency of smooth goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickands, J., 1975. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. The Annals of Statistics, 3, 119–131.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Radouane, O., Crétois, E., 2002. Neyman smooth tests for the generalized Pareto distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 31(7), 1067–1078.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., 1989. Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit. Oxford University Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., Mathews, K.L., 1995. Interpreting the skewness coefficient. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 24, 593–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., Thas, O., Best, D.J., 2009. Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit, Using R, 2nd Edition. Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, J.C.W., Thas, O., De Boeck, B., 2008. A generalised Emerson recurrence relation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 50(3), 235–240.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., 1984. Threshold methods for sample extremes. In Statistical Extremes and Applications, Tiago de Oliveira J., (Editor), pages 621–635, Reidel, D., Dordrecht.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W., 2005. Smooth tests for the zero-inflated Poisson distribution. Biometrics, 61(3), 808–815.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., De Boeck, B., 2009. Informative statistical analyses using smooth goodness of fit tests. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 3(3), 705–733.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D.R., Pierce, D.A., 1979. Neyman’s smooth goodness-of-fit test when the hypothesis is composite. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 441–445.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., 2007. Likelihood moment estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 49(1), 69–77.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. De Boeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Boeck, B., Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W. et al. Generalised Smooth Tests for the Generalised Pareto Distribution. J Stat Theory Pract 5, 737–750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2011.10483742

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2011.10483742

AMS Subject Classification

Key-words

Navigation