Abstract
The generalised Pareto distribution (GPD) is often used to model extreme values. New smooth tests of goodness of fit are proposed for this distribution. Typical problems with the GPD are that not all moments exist and not all classical estimation procedures work well over the whole parameter space. The generalised smooth test has good powers within a subset of the parameter space for which other tests may not be defined or appropriate, and, conversely, the Anderson-Darling test performs well when the test proposed here does not.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angus, J.E., 1982. Goodness-of-fit tests for exponentiality based on loss-of-memory type functional equation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 6(3), 241–251.
Boos, D.D., 1992. On generalized score tests. The American Statistician, 46(4), 327–333.
Castillo, E., Hadi, A.S., 1997. Fitting the generalized Pareto distribution to data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(440), 1609–1620.
Choulakian, V., Stephens, M.A., 2001. Goodness-of-fit for the generalised Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 43(4), 478–484.
Dahiya, R.C., Gurland, J., 1972. Goodness of fit tests for the gamma and exponential distributions. Techno-metrics, 14(3), 791–801.
Dupuis, D.J., Tsao, M., 1998. A hybrid estimator for generalized Pareto and extreme-value distributions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 27(4), 925–941.
Grimshaw, S.D., 1993. Computing maximum likelihood estimates for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 35(2), 185–191.
Hall, W.J., Mathiason, D.J., 1990. On large-sample estimation and testing in parametric models. International Statistical Review, 58, 77–97.
Henze, N., Klar, B., 1996. Properly rescaled components of smooth tests of fit are diagnostic. Australian Journal of Statistics, 38, 61–74.
Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1987. Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Technometrics, 29(3), 339–349.
Klar, B., 2000. Diagnostic smooth tests of fit. Metrika, 52, 237–252.
Kopecky, K.J., Pierce, D.A., 1979. Efficiency of smooth goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 393–397.
Pickands, J., 1975. Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. The Annals of Statistics, 3, 119–131.
Radouane, O., Crétois, E., 2002. Neyman smooth tests for the generalized Pareto distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 31(7), 1067–1078.
Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., 1989. Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit. Oxford University Press, New York.
Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., Mathews, K.L., 1995. Interpreting the skewness coefficient. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 24, 593–600.
Rayner, J.C.W., Thas, O., Best, D.J., 2009. Smooth Tests of Goodness of Fit, Using R, 2nd Edition. Wiley.
Rayner, J.C.W., Thas, O., De Boeck, B., 2008. A generalised Emerson recurrence relation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 50(3), 235–240.
Smith, R., 1984. Threshold methods for sample extremes. In Statistical Extremes and Applications, Tiago de Oliveira J., (Editor), pages 621–635, Reidel, D., Dordrecht.
Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W., 2005. Smooth tests for the zero-inflated Poisson distribution. Biometrics, 61(3), 808–815.
Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W., Best, D.J., De Boeck, B., 2009. Informative statistical analyses using smooth goodness of fit tests. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, 3(3), 705–733.
Thomas, D.R., Pierce, D.A., 1979. Neyman’s smooth goodness-of-fit test when the hypothesis is composite. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 441–445.
Zhang, J., 2007. Likelihood moment estimation for the generalized Pareto distribution. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 49(1), 69–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Boeck, B., Thas, O., Rayner, J.C.W. et al. Generalised Smooth Tests for the Generalised Pareto Distribution. J Stat Theory Pract 5, 737–750 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2011.10483742
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15598608.2011.10483742