Skip to main content
Log in

American Exceptionalism: The Implications for Europe

  • Published:
Journal of Transatlantic Studies Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. J. Bryan Collester, ‘How Defense ‘Spilled Over’ Into the CFSP: Western European Union (WEU) and the European Security and Defense Identity (ESDI)’, in Maria Green Cowles and Michael Smith (Eds) The State of the European Union: Risks, Reform, Resistance, and Revival (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Geir Lundestad, The United States and Western Europe Since 1945: From ‘Empire’ by Invitation to Transatlantic Drift (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), Introduction.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (various editions and years), Vol. II, First Book, Chapter IX.

  4. de Tocqueville, ibid.

  5. For more details on the debate over the meaning and signficance of American excep- tionalism, see Trevor B. McCrisken, American Exceptionalism and the Legacy of Vietnam: US Foreign Policy Since 1974 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), Introduction.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Byron E. Shafer (ed), Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. v.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ari Hoogenbloom, ‘American Exceptionalism: Republicanism as Ideology’, in Elizabeth Glaser and Herman Wellenreuther, Bridging the Atlantic: The Question of American Exceptionalism in Perspective (Washington DC: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koh, Harold Hongju, ‘Foreword: On American Exceptionalism’, in Stanford Law Review, 55:5, May 2003, pp. 1479–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edward C. Luck, ‘American Exceptionalism and International Organization: Lessons from the 1990s’, in Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane and Michael Mastanduno (eds), US Hegemony and International Organizations: The United States and Multilateral Institutions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer, op. cit., p. vi.

  11. Seymour Martin Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword (New York: WW Norton, 1996), p. 13, 26, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a debate on this issue, see Anatol Lieven, America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted in Michael Kazin, ‘The Right’s Unsung Prophet’, in The Nation, 248 (20 February 1989), p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, op.cit., p. 31. Seymour Martin Lipset, ‘American Exceptionalism Reaffirmed’ in Shafer, op. cit.

  15. G.K. Chesterton, What I Saw in America (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1922), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, op.cit., p. 19.

  17. Clyde Wilcox and Ted G. Jelen, ‘Religion and Politics in an Open Market: Religious Mobilization in the United States’, in Ted G. Jelen and Clyde Wilcox (eds), Religion and Politics in Comparative Perspective: The One, the Few, and the Many (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 294–295.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCrisken, op. cit.. Chapter 5.

  19. William J. Clinton, in speech at George Washington University, 5 August 1996.

  20. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, op.cit.

  21. Louise I. Shelley, ‘American Crime: An International Anomaly?’ in Comparative Social Research 8, 1985, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, op.cit., Chapters 2 and 3.

  23. Will Hutton, The World We’ re In (London: Abacus, 2003), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luck, op. cit., p. 27.

  25. George W. Bush, at White House press conference, Washington DC, 6 November 2001.

  26. White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September 2002

    Google Scholar 

  27. In order, they are Russia, China, Japan, Britain, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Italy, India, and South Korea.

  28. Lipset, American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword, op.cit., p. 47.

  29. For a discussion of the US ambivalence towards the international rule of law, see John Murphy, The United States and the Rule of Law in International Affairs (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Mary Ellen O’Connell, ‘American Exceptionalism and the International Law of SelfDefense’, in Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 31:1, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Amnesty International, ‘Guantanamo and Beyond: The Continuing Pursuit of Unchecked Executive Power’, AMR 51/063/2005, 13 May 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. ‘Bush Says Amnesty Report ‘Absurd” on BBC News Online, https://doi.org/www.news.bbc.co.uk, 31 May 2005.

  33. ibid.

  34. For discussion, see Geoffrey Edwards, ‘The Problems and Possible Future Development of a European Identity in the European Union’, in Peter J. Anderson, Georg Wiessala and Christopher Williams (eds), New Europe in Transition (London: Continuum, 2000), and

    Google Scholar 

  35. David Dunkerley, Lesley Hodgson, Stanislaw Konopacki, Tony Spybey and Andrew Thompson, Changing Europe: Identities, Nations and Citizens (London: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See, for example, Worldviews Survey of American and European Attitudes and Public Opinion on Foreign Policy, undertaken by Chicago Council on Foreign Relations and German Marshall Fund, 2002; https://doi.org/www.worldviews.org

  37. Pew Research Center poll, 18 March 2003.

  38. Eurobarometer poll, October 2003.

  39. Vaclav Havel, in address to the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 16 February 2000.

  40. Roger Scruton, A Dictionary of Political Thought, 2nd ed (London: Macmillan, 1996), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Search on Google search engine, August 2005.

  42. Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, ‘February 15, or What Binds Europe Together’ in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 31 May 2003, quoted in

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rockwell A. Schnabel and Francis X. Rocca, The Next Superpower? The Rise of Europe and Its Challenge to the United States (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Timothy Garton Ash, Free World (London: Penguin, 2004), pp. 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hutton, op.cit., pp. 54–58.

  46. Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (New York: Alfred Knopf, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Clyde Prestowitz, Rogue Nation: American Unilateralism and the Failure of Good Intentions (New York: Basic Books, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. T.D. Allman, Rogue State: America at War With the World (New York: Nation Books, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Joseph Nye, Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power (New York: Basic Books, 1990); and Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  50. ‘Bush Warns Iran on Nuclear Plans” on BBC News Online, https://doi.org/www.news.bbc.co.uk, 13 August 2005.

  51. Jeremy Rifkin, The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream (New York: Jeremy Tarcher/Penguin, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  52. See discussion in John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America (New York: Penguin, 2004), or

    Google Scholar 

  53. Thomas Frank, What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Figures from Allensbach Opinion Research Institute, National Opinion Research Center, and Pew Research Center, quoted in The Economist, ‘A Nation Apart’, 8 November 2003.

  55. Hutton, op. cit., p 17.

  56. For more details, see Susan Baker and John McCormick, ‘Sustainable Development: Comparative Understandings and Responses’, in Norman J. Vig and Michael G. Faure (Eds), Green Giants: Environmental Policy of the United States and the European Union (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  57. World Values Survey. Figures for 2002.

  58. Crouch, Colin, ‘The Quiet Continent: Religion and Politics in Europe’, in David Marquand and Ronald L. Nettler (eds), Religion and Democracy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Grace Davie, Religion in Britain Since 1945: Believing Without Belonging (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994) and Religion in Modem Europe: A Memory Mutates (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Christopher Soper and Joel Fetzer, ‘Religion and Politics in a Secular Europe: Cutting Against the Grain’, in Jelen and Wilcox, op. cit.

  61. For discussion, see Carole Tonge, ‘A Christian Union?’ in New Humanist, 18:2, 1 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCormick, J. American Exceptionalism: The Implications for Europe. J Transatl Stud 3, 199–215 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794010608656826

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794010608656826

Navigation