An overview of the ACE project—Advocating for Clinical Excellence: Transdisciplinary palliative care education

Abstract

Background. Excellence in palliative care demands attention to the multidimensional aspects of patient and family suffering, yet too few psycho-oncology professionals report adequate preparation in this vital area. Methods. A total of 148 competitively selected psychologists, social workers, and spiritual care professionals participated in intensive educational courses to enhance their palliative care delivery, leadership, and advocacy skills. Extensive process and outcome evaluations measured the effectiveness of this educational program. Results. To date, 2 national courses have been completed. The courses received strong overall evaluations, with participants rating increased confidence in defined palliative care skills. Conclusions. The initial results of this innovative National Cancer Institute-funded transdisciplinary training for psycho-oncology professionals affirm the need and feasibility of the program. See the Advocating for Clinical Excellence Project Web site (www.cityofhope.org/ACEproject) for additional course information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Field MJ. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Last Acts Means to a Better End: A Report on Dying in America Today. Washington, DC: Last Acts National Program Office; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zabora J, Brintzenhofe Szoc K, Curbow B, et al. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-oncology. 2001;10: 19–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Field MJ, Cassel CK, eds. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Institute of Medicine (IOM). Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Taylor Brown S, Blacker S, Walsh-Burke K, Christ G, Altilio T. Care at the End of Life; Best Practices Series. Philadelphia, PA. Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kramer BJ, Christ GH, Bern-Klug M, Franceour RB. A national agenda for social work research in palliative in end-of-life care. J Palliat Med. 2005;8:418–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients: the study to understand prognosis and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. Brooklyn, NY: National Consensus Project; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    National Quality Forum. A National Framework and Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care Quality. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2006. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/publications/reports/palliative.asp. Accessed December 17, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gelfand DE, Baker L, Cooney G. Developing end-of-life interdisciplinary programs in university wide settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20:201–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rhiner M, Otis-Green S, Slatkin N. Psychosocial-spiritual responses to cancer and treatment: living with cancer. In: Varricchio C, ed. A Cancer Source Book for Nurses 8th ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004:501–511.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reese DJ, Sontag M-A. Successful interprofessional collaboration on the hospice team. Health Soc Work. 2001;26:167–175.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Otis-Green S, Sherman R, Perez M, Baird P. An integrated psychosocial-spiritual model for cancer pain management. Cancer Pract. 2002;10(suppl 1):S58-S65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Holland JC. Societal views of cancer and the emergence of psychooncology. In: Holland JC, ed. Psycho-oncology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998:3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Holland JC. Improving the human side of cancer care: psycho oncology’s contribution. Cancer J. 2001;7:458–471.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Foley KM, Gelband H. Improving palliative care for cancer. Report of the Institute of Medicine Task Force. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Enck RE. Connecting the medical and spiritual models in patients nearing death. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20:88–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Larson DG. The caring team. In: Larson DG. The Helper’s Journey: Working with People Facing Grief, Loss, and Life-threatening Illness. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1993:199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sulmasy DP. A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist. 2002;42:24–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    McCallin A. Interdisciplinary practice—a matter of teamwork: an integrated literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:419–428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lickiss JN, Turner KS, Pollock M L. The interdisciplinary team. In: Doyle, D, Hanks G, Cherny N, Calman K, eds. Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2003:42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fineberg I-C, Wenger NS, Forrow L. Interdisciplinary education: evaluation of palliative care training for pre-professionals. Acad Med. 2004;79:769–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Koffman J, Higginson IJ. Assessing the effectiveness and acceptability of interprofessional palliative care education J Palliat Care. 2005;21:262–269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Grant M, Hanson, J. Issues and opportunities in quality end-of-life care. J Oncol Manag. 2002;1:22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Simpson D. From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: Strengthening the hospice team. Hosp Palliat Care Insights. 2003;4:8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Larson DG. The caring team. In: Larson DG. The Helper’s Journey. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1993:199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hedlund S, Clark E. End-of-life issues: social work in oncology supporting survivors, families, and caregivers. American Cancer Society Health Content Products, Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2001:299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Haley WE, Larson DG, Kasl-Godley J, Neimeyer RA, Kwilosz D. Roles for psychologists in end-of-life care: emerging models of practice. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2003;34:626–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fitchett G, Handzo G. Spiritual assessment, screening, and intervention. In: Holland JC, ed. Psycho-Oncology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998:790–808.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Holland JC, Chertkov L. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial and physical symptoms of cancer. In: Foley KM Gelband H. eds., Improving Palliative Care of Cancer. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001:199–232.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bailey G. NASW standards for social work practice in palliative and end of life care. National Academy of Social Workers; 2004. Available at: http://www.naswdc.org/practice/bereavement/standards/default.asp.Accessed December 21, 2007.

  33. 33.

    American Psychosocial Oncology Society. The Multidisciplinary Curriculum in Psycho-Oncology. Available at: http://apos-society.org/professionals/meetings-ed/webcasts/webcasts-multidisciplinary.aspx. Accessed December 21, 2007.

  34. 34.

    Wesley C, Tunney K, Duncan E. Educational needs of hospice social workers: Spiritual assessment and interventions with diverse populations. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004;21:40–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Twillman RK, Barnett ML, Cohen, BA. Marraging pain as a biopsychosocial experience. In: Lipman AG, ed. Pain Management for Primary Care Clinicians. New York, NY: American Society of Health System Pharmacists; 2004:91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Altilio T, Otis-Green S, Hedlund S, Cohen Fineberg I. Pain management and palliative care. In: Gehlert S, Arthur Browne T, eds. Handbook of Health Social Work. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2006:635–672.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Supportive Care Guidelines for Distress Management, 2007. Available at: http://www.nccn.org. Accessed December 21, 2007.

  38. 38.

    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Supportive Care Guidelines for Palliative Care, 2007. Available at: http://www.nccn.org. Accessed December 21, 2007.

  39. 39.

    Williams BR. Dying young, dying poor: a sociological examination of existential suffering among low-socioeconomic status patients. J Palliat Med. 2004;7:27–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethic Disparities in Health Care. Report of the Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Otis-Green S, Lucas S, Spolum M, Ferrell BR, Grant M. Promoting excellence in pain management & palliative care for social workers. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2008;4(2):120–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Emanuel LL, von Gunten CF, Ferris FD. The Education for Physicians on End-of-Life Care (EPEC) Curriculum. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Paice JA, Ferrell BR, Virani, R, et al. Appraisal of the graduate end-of-life nursing education consortium training program. J. Palliat Med. 2006;9:353–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Grant M, Hanson J, Mullan P, Spolum M, & Ferrell BR. Disseminating end-of-life education to cancer centers: overview of program and of evaluation. J Cancer Ed. 2004;22:140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:523–531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little Brown & Company; 2000.

  48. 48.

    Knowles MS. The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mezirow J & Associates. Learning as Transformation Critical Perspectives on a theory in Progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    VandeCreek L, Burton L. Proressional chaplaincy: its role and importance in healthcare. J Pastoral Care. 2001;55:81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gwyther LP, Altilio T, Blacker S, et al. Social work competencies in palliative and end-of-life care. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2005;1:87–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Holland JC, Greenberg DB, Hughes MK, eds. Quick Reference for Oncology Clinicians: The Psychiatric and Psychological Dimensions of Cancer Symptom Management. Charlottesville, VA: IPOS Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Association of Oncology Social Work. Oncology Nursing Society and Association of Oncology Social Work Joint Positions on End-of-Life Care. Available at: http://www.ons.org/publications/positions/EndOfLifeCare.shtml. Accessed December 21, 2007.

  54. 54.

    Lynn J, Chaudhry E, Noyes Simon L, Wilkinson AM, Sauster JL. The Common Sense Guide to Improving Palliative Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirley Otis-Green MSW, LCSW, ACSW, OSW-C.

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute R-25 CA110454 (Shirley Otis-Green, MSW, ACSW, LCSW, OSW-C, Principal Investigator).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otis-Green, S., Ferrell, B., Spolum, M. et al. An overview of the ACE project—Advocating for Clinical Excellence: Transdisciplinary palliative care education. J Canc Educ 24, 120–126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/08858190902854616

Download citation

Keywords

  • Palliative Care
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • National Quality Forum
  • Spiritual Assessment
  • Advocacy Skill