# Three Categories of Minimum Cost Systematic Full 2^{n} Factorial Designs

## Abstract

Full 2^{n} factorial experiments are often conducted sequentially run after run. A full 2^{n} factorial experiment has a total of 2^{n}! permutations among its 2^{n} runs but not all of these 2^{n}! permutations produce runs sequences with good statistical properties. In fact, the standard runs order is not economic (requiring a large number of factor level changes between runs), and does not produce time-trend-resistant main effects. Four main algorithms exist for sequencing runs of the full 2^{n} factorial experiment such that: (1) main effects and/or two-factor interactions are orthogonal to the linear/quadratic time trend and/or (2) the number of factor level changes between runs (i.e., cost) is minimal = (2^{n} − 1) or minimum. This article proposes, through using the generalized foldover scheme and the interactions-main effects assignment, three categories of systematic full 2^{n} factorial designs where main effects and/or two-factor interactions are linear/quadratic trend free and where the number of factor level changes is minimal (i.e., (2^{n} − 1)) or less than that of existing algorithms. These three categories are called (i) minimal-cost full 2^{n} factorial designs, (ii) minimum-cost linear-trend-free full 2^{n} factorial designs, and (iii) minimum-cost linear and quadratic-trend-free full 2^{n} factorial designs. A comparison with existing systematic full 2^{n} factorial designs reveals that the proposed systematic 2^{n} designs compete well regarding minimization of the number of factor level changes (i.e., cost) or regarding protection of main effects and/or two-factor interactions against the linear/quadratic time trend.

## Keywords

Sequential factorial experimentation Time-trend-free run orders Number of factor level changes and the experimental cost Runs sequencing algorithms Interactions-main effects assignment Generalized foldover scheme## AMS Subject Classification

62K15## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Cheng, C. S., and M. Jacroux. 1988. The construction of trend-free run orders of two-level factorial designs.
*J. Am. Stat. Assoc.*, 83, 1152–1158.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cheng, C. S., and D. M. Steinburg. 1991. Trend robust two-level factorial designs.
*Biometrika*, 78(2), 325–336.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Correa, A. A., P. Grima, and X. Tort-Martorell. 2009. Experimentation order with good properties for 2
^{k}factorial designs.*J. Appl. Stat.*, 36(7), 743–754.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Coster, D. C., and C. S. Cheng. 1988. Minimum cost trend-free run orders of fractional factorial designs.
*Ann. Stat.*, 16, 1188–1205.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cox, D. R. 1951. Some systematic experimental design.
*Biometrika*, 38, 312–323.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cui, X., and P. W. John. 1998. Time trend free run orders with minimum level changes.
*Commun. Stat. Theory Methods*, 27, 55–68.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Daniel, C., and F. Wilcoxon. 1966. Factorial 2
^{p−q}plans robust against linear and quadratic effects.*Technometrics*, 8, 259–278.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Dickinson, A. W. 1974. Some run orders requiring a minimum number of factor level changes for the 24 and 25 main effect plans.
*Technometrics*, 16, 31–37.zbMATHGoogle Scholar - Draper, N. R., and D. M. Stoneman. 1968. Factor level changes and linear trends in eight-run two-level factorial designs.
*Technometrics*, 10, 301–311.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hilow, H. M. 2013. Comparison among run order algorithms for sequential factorial experiments.
*J. Comput. Stat. Data Anal.*, 58, 397–406.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Joiner, B. L., and C. Campbell. 1976. Designing experiments when run order is important.
*Technometrics*, 18, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Martin, R. J., G. Jones, and J. A. Eccleston. 1998. Eight-run two-level factorial designs under dependence.
*Metrika*, 48, 127–139.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mee, R. W., and A. V. Romanova. 2010. Constructing and analyzing two-level trend robust designs.
*Qual. Eng.*, 22, 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Olguin, J., and T. Fearn. 1997. A new look at half-normal plots for assessing the significance of contrasts for unreplicated factorials.
*Appl. Stat.*, 46(4), 449–462.Google Scholar