Comparing Designs Constructed With and Without Priors for Choice Experiments: A Case Study
This article describes the second stage of an empirical comparison of the performance of designs for a discrete choice experiment. Six designs were chosen to represent the range of construction techniques that are currently popular for choice experiments, with some of the designs incorporating into the design generation process prior knowledge of the parameters gained from the previous stage of this experiment. Each design had 320 respondents, each of whom completed 16 choice sets. The results indicate that efficient designs constructed using several different strategies all identify various types of heterogeneity with similar levels of precision. Specifying the right model to best describe the underlying preferences of respondents in each sample may then become the limiting factor in the estimation of more complex generalized multinomial models, rather than the design per se.
KeywordsMNL model G-MNL model Mixed logit Stated preference experiments
AMS Subject Classification62K05 62P20
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bliemer, M., and J. M. Rose. 2011. Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice. Transport. Res. Part A, 45, 63–79.Google Scholar
- Gu, Y., A. Hole, and S. Knox. 2013. Estimating the generalized multinomial logit in stata. Stata J., 13, 382–397.Google Scholar
- Kuhfeld, W. F., 2009. Marketing research methods in SAS. Technical report, SAS Institute, Inc. Available at https://doi.org/support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2009.pdfw
- Louviere, J. J., and E. Lancsar. 2009. Choice experiments in health: The good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ., 4, 527–546.Google Scholar
- Rose, J. M., A. Collins, M. Bliemer, and D. A. Hensher. 2009. Ngene 1.0 stated choice experiment design software. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
- Zwerina, K., J. Huber, and W. Kuhfeld. 1996. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Technical report, SAS Institute, Inc. Available at https://doi.org/support.sas.com/resources/papers/tnote/tnotemarketresearch.html