Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 355–367 | Cite as

A Note on Monte Carlo Maximization by the Density Ratio Model

  • Konstantinos Fokianos
  • Jing Qin
Article

Abstract

It is well known that untractable normalizing constants of probability density functions complicate the calculation of maximum likelihood estimators. Usually numerical or Monte Carlo methods are employed in order to obtain an approximation to the solution of the likelihood equations. We propose a new statistical method for carrying out the calculations regarding maximum likelihood estimation by avoiding the explicit calculation of any normalizing constant. We formulate the problem within the framework of semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation for a two samples model, where the ratio of two densities is known up to some parameters, but the form of the two densities are unknown and one of the sample sizes can be chosen arbitrarily large. The two-sample semiparametric model-which is referred as density ratio model-arises naturally in case-control studies. Statistical inference techniques are developed for this model. Comparisons between the proposed method and the conventional estimated pseudo-likelihood method are studied.

AMS Subject Classification

Primary 62G05 Secondary 65C05 

Keywords

Biased sampling empirical likelihood density ratio model likelihood ratio normalizing constant 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.A., 1972. Separate sample logistic discrimination. Biometrika, 59, 19–35.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.A., 1979. Multivariate logistic compounds. Biometrika, 66, 17–26.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslow, N.E., Day, N.E., 1980. The Analysis of Case-Control Data, Volume 1 of Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. World Helath Organization.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D.R., Snell E.J., 1989. The Analysis of Binary Data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Farewell, V.T., 1979. Some results on the estimation of logistic models based on retrospective data. Biometrika, 66, 27–32.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fokianos, K., Kedem, B., Qin, J., Short, D.A., 2001. A semiparametric approach to the one-way layout. Technometrics, 43, 56–64.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geyer, C., 1999. Likelihood inference for spatial point processes. In Stochastic geometry (Toulouse, 1996), Volume 80 of Monogr. Statist. Appl. Probab., pp. 79–140. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  8. Geyer, C.J., 1994. Estimating normalizing constants and reweighting mixtures in Markov chain Monte Carlo. Technical Report 568, School of Statistics, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, P.B., 2000. Large sample theory of maximum likelihood estimates in semiparametric biased sampling models. The Annals of Statistics, 28, 151–194.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert, P.B., Lele, S.R., Vardi, Y., 1999. Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric selection bias models with application to AIDS vaccine trials. Biometrika 86, 27–43.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kong, A., McCullagh, P., Meng, X.-L., Nicolae, D., Tan, Z., 2003. A theory of statistical models for Monte Carlo integration. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 65, 585–618, with discussion.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Owen, A.B., 1988. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika, 75, 237–249.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Owen, A.B., 2001. Empirical Likleihood. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prentice, R.L., Pyke, R., 1979. Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika, 66, 403–411.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qin, J., 1998. Inferences for case-control data and semiparametric two-sample density ratio models. Biometrika, 85, 619–630.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Qin, J., Fokianos, K., 2003. Contribution to the discussion of Kong et al (2003). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 65, 585–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qin, J., Lawless, J. F., 1994. Empirical likelihood and general estimating functions. Ann. Statist., 22, 300–325.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Qin, J., Zhang, B., 1997. A goodness of fit test for the logistic regression model based on case-control data. Biometrika, 84, 609–618.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robert, C. P., Casella, G., 1999. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanner, M. A., 1996. Tools for Statistical Inference (Third ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. Methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics & StatisticsUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseaseNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations