Advertisement

Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 233–251 | Cite as

Bayesian Analysis of Quality Adjusted Lifetime (QAL) Data

Article

Abstract

In many clinical trials, the quality of life assessments are made at regular intervals together with clinically measurable endpoints. Quality adjusted lifetime (QAL) data analysis can serve as an important tool to the medical and the patient community. This article presents a Bayesian approach to analyze quality adjusted lifetime data. Considering a progressive health state model, a flexible class of parametric mixture distributions is proposed for the log of the time spent in different health states. Viewing the censored observations as missing variables, a data augmentation scheme integrated within a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to obtain statistical inference. The proposed models are allowed to include several explanatory variables within a regression model. Simulation studies and an analysis of real-life data from a clinical trial, are presented to illustrate the proposed methods.

AMS Subject Classification

62N01 and 62F15 

Keywords

Bayesian Inference Data Augmentation Gibbs Sampling Markov Chain Monte Carlo Quality Adjusted Survival TWiST 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cole, B.F., Gelber, R.D., Goldhirsch, A., 1993. Cox regression models for quality adjusted survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 12, 975–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cole, B.F., Gelber, R.D., Anderson, K.M., 1994. Parametric approaches to quality adjusted survival analysis. Biometrics, 50, 621–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Escobar, M.D., West, M., 1995. Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures, Journal of American Statistical Association. 90, 577–88.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelber, R.D., Gelman, R.S., Goldhirsch, A., 1989. A quality-of-life oriented endpoint for comparing therapies, Biometrics. 45, 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelber, R.D., Goldhirsch, A., Cole, B.F., 1993. Parametric Extrapolation of Survial Estimates with Applications to Quality of Life Evaluation of Treatments, Controlled Clinical Trials. 14, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geyer, C., 1992. Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Statistical Sciences 7, 473–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glasziou, P.P., Simes, R.J., Gelber, R.D., 1990. Quality Adjusted Survival Analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 9, 125976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh, S. K., Mukhopadhyay, P., Lu, J. C., 2006. Bayesian Analysis of Zer-inflated Regression Models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 136, 1360–1375.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klein, J.P., Grambsch, P.M., 1997. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censoredo and Truncated Data, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, S., Cole, B.F., 2000. Variance and sample size calculations in quality-of-life-adjusted survival analysis (Q-TWiST). Biometrics, 56, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Robert, C.P., 1993. Convergence assessments for Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods. Working Paper 9248, Crest, Insee, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Robert, C.P., 1995. Mixtures of Distributions: Inference and Estimation. In Markov Chain Monte Carlo In Practice(eds W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson and D.J. Spiegelhalter), 441–464. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Tanner, M., Wong, W., 1987. The calculation of Posterior Distributions by Data Augmentation (with discussion). Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, 528–50.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Therneau, T.M., Grambsch, P.M., 2000. Modeling Survival Data. Extending the Cox Model, SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao, H., Tsiatis, A. A., 1997. A Consistent Estimator for the Distribution of Quality Adjusted Survival Time. Biometrika, 84, 339–48.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tierney, L, 1994. Markov Chain for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion). Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Grace Scientific Publishing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Schering Plough Research InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations