Advertisement

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 368–386 | Cite as

Changing attitudes towards economic development and democracy in Brazil: Roberto Simonsen, Ernest Hambloch and the Brazilian Commercial Mission to the UK in 1919

  • Robert HowesEmail author
Article

Abstract

The visit of the Brazilian Commercial Mission to the UK in 1919 helped produce a change in mentalities following the First World War. The attitudes of British officials and business representatives reveal their priorities in attempting to reestablish Britain’s trading and financial position in Brazil amidst the emerging commercial rivalry of the USA. The visit influenced the thinking of the entrepreneur, Roberto Simonsen, who became Brazil’s leading proponent of state-led industrialisation. The British diplomat, Ernest Hambloch, later wrote His Majesty the President, a critical account of the workings of republican Brazil’s political system. The different views of these two participants illustrate the tension between development and democracy in twentieth century Brazilian history.

Keywords

Brazil — history — twentieth century Anglo-Brazilian relations industrialisation parliamentary democracy Roberto Simonsen Ernest Hambloch 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Rory Miller, Britain and Latin America in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Longman, 1993), 244Google Scholar
  2. 1a.
    Ronald Robinson and John Gallagher with Alice Denny, Africa and the Victorians: The Official Mind of Imperialism, 2nd ed. (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1981, 1989 reprint), 19–23. See alsoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 1b.
    Patrick H. Hutton, ‘The History of Mentalities: The New Map of Cultural History’, History and Theory 20, no. 3 (October 1981): 237–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 2.
    Eli Diniz, Empresário, Estado e Capitalismo no Brasil, 1930–1945 [Entrepreneur, State and Capitalism in Brazil, 1930–1945] (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1978)Google Scholar
  5. 2a.
    Wanderley Guilherme dos Santos, Ordem Burguesa e Liberalismo Político [Bourgeois Order and Political Liberalism] (São Paulo: Livraria Duas Cidades, 1978)Google Scholar
  6. 2b.
    Milton Tosto Jr., The Meaning of Liberalism in Brazil (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005).Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Bill Albert, South America and the First World War: The Impact of the War on Brazil, Argentina, Peru and Chile, pbk ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    Eugênio Vargas Garcia, O Brasil e a Liga das Nações, 1919–1926: Vencer ou não Perder [Brazil and the League of Nations, 1919–1926: To Win or Not to Lose] (Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS/FUNAG, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. 5.
    E. Bradford Burns, Nationalism in Brazil: A Historical Survey (New York: Praeger, 1968)Google Scholar
  10. 5a.
    Ludwig Lauerhass Jr., Getúlio Vargas e o Triunfo do Nacionalismo Brasileiro [Getúlio Vargas and the Triumph of Brazilian Nationalism] (Belo Horizonte: Itatiaia, 1986)Google Scholar
  11. 5b.
    Barbosa Lima Sobrinho, Desde Quando Somos Nacionalistas? [Since When Have we Been Nationalists?] (Petropolis: Vozes, 1995).Google Scholar
  12. 6.
    Great Britain, Parliament, House of Commons, ‘Final Report of the Committee on Commercial and Industrial Policy after the War’, Sessional Papers, 1918 (Cd. 9035), 44, 64.Google Scholar
  13. 7.
    Ephraim Maisel, ‘The Formation of the Department of Overseas Trade, 1919–1926’, Journal of Contemporary History 24, no. 1 (1989): 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 8.
    Great Britain, Parliament, House of Commons, ‘Correspondence Respecting the British Mission to South America, 1918’, Sessional Papers, 1919 (Cmd. 12)Google Scholar
  15. 8a.
    Follett Holt, British Diplomatic and Commercial Mission to South America, 1918: Report (London: HMSO, 1919).Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    The National Archives, FO371/3653, 280–305; W.S. Barclay, A Visit to Brazil (2nd April to 25th June 1919): Report and Memoranda. 24 June 1919.Google Scholar
  17. 10.
    Marcelo de Paiva Abreu, ‘Anglo-Brazilian Economic Relations and the Consolidation of American Pre-eminence in Brazil, 1930–1945’, in Latin America, Economic Imperialism and the State: The Political Economy of the External Connection from Independence to the Present, ed. Christopher Abel and Colin M. Lewis (London: Athlone Press, 1984), 379–93Google Scholar
  18. 10a.
    Winston Fritsch, External Constraints on Economic Policy in Brazil, 1889–1930 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 10b.
    Eugenio Vargas Garcia, Anglo-American Rivalry in Brazil: The Case of the 1920s (Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Brazilian Studies, 2000) Working Paper Series; CBS-14-00 (P)Google Scholar
  20. 10c.
    Stanley E. Hilton, Brazil and the Great Powers, 1930–1939: The Politics of Trade Rivalry (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1975)Google Scholar
  21. 10d.
    Emily S. Rosenberg, ‘Anglo-American Economic Rivalry in Brazil during World War I’, Diplomatic History 2, no. 2 (1978): 131–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 11.
    Emily S. Rosenberg, World War I and the Growth of United States Predominance in Latin America (New York: Garland, 1987); FO371/3654, 368–373: Peel to Curzon, Rio de Janeiro, May 20, 1919.Google Scholar
  23. 12.
    FO371/3653, 280–305: Barclay, A Visit to Brazil.Google Scholar
  24. 13.
    FO371/3653, 285, 294: Barclay, A Visit to Brazil.Google Scholar
  25. 14.
    Michael Streeter, Epitácio Pessoa: Brazil (London: Haus Histories, 2010).Google Scholar
  26. 15.
    ‘Brazilian State Visit’, Times, June 3, 1919.Google Scholar
  27. 16.
    University of Warwick Archives, Mss.200/F/1/1/62/ff. 119–120, 143–144; Mss.200/F/1/1/63/ff.54–55, 58: Federation of British Industries, Overseas Trade Committee, Minute Book, Meetings held on Oct. 9, 1918; Nov. 20, 1918; May 15, 1919. See also correspondence in FO371/3654.Google Scholar
  28. 17.
    The delegates were Dr. João Pandiá Calógeras, Dr. Souza Bandeira, Dr. Manoel Ferreira de Almeida, José Adonias de Araujo, Felix Guisard, Dr. Roberto Cochrane Simonsen, Dr. Manoel Thomaz Carvalho de Britto and Dr. Hannibal Porto: FO368/2074: Peel to Curzon, Rio de Janeiro, June 3, 1919 and Boletim da Federação das Industrias Britannicas: Edição Anglo-Brazileira, Londres, Outubro de 1919: 24, 27.Google Scholar
  29. 18.
    ‘The Brazilian Commercial Mission: An Eight Weeks’ Programme’, Times, June 21, 1919; ‘Anglo-Brazilian Trade: Arrival of a Special Mission’, Times, June 25, 1919; ‘Visit of the Brazilian Delegates’, Financial Times, June 26, 1919; ‘Brazil to Help British Manufactures: Commercial Mission’s Aim’, Times, June 27, 1919; ‘Brazilian Commercial Delegates: Prime Minister’s Welcome’, Financial Times, June 28, 1919; ‘International Trade: Brazilian Commercial Delegates Visit Birmingham’, Birmingham Post, June 30, 1919; ‘Brazilians in Birmingham: Reception by the Lord Mayor’, Birmingham Post, July 1, 1919; ‘Trade with Brazil: Commercial Mission in Scotland’, Times, July 15, 1919; ‘Trade with Brazil: The Commercial Deputation in Manchester’, Manchester Guardian, July 24, 1919; ‘Brazilian Trade Mission: Prospect of Permanent Results’, Times, August 9, 1919; ‘Brazilian Delegates’ Impressions: “British Energy and Enterprise”’, Times, August 28, 1919; ‘British Trade with Brazil: Exchange of Views’, Financial Times, August 28, 1919; ‘Great Britain and Brazil: Closer Relations in the Future’, Times, August 30, 1919. Four reports written by one of the delegates during the visit were published by the Jornal do Comércio, the main business newspaper in Rio, and, together with seven articles published in the Rio press on the return of the delegation, reprinted in Hannibal Porto, O Brasil em Face da Inglaterra Industrial [Brazil and Industrial Britain] (São Paulo: Secção de Obras de ‘O Estado de S. Paulo’, 1919).Google Scholar
  30. 19.
    ‘Brazil and Britain: Commercial Delegates at Bath’, Bristol Times and Mirror, August 12, 1919; ‘Brazilians in Bristol: Stunting in an Aeroplane’, Bristol Times and Mirror, August 14, 1919; ‘Brazilians in Bristol: Commercial Delegates at Filton’, Bristol Evening News, August 14, 1919.Google Scholar
  31. 20.
    Bulletin of the Federation of British Industries II, nos. 17–29, June 9 to September 1, 1919; Boletim da Federação das Industrias Britannicas: Edição Anglo-Brazileira, Londres, Outubro de 1919. The official programme of the visit (subsequently slightly amended) was printed in the Bulletin, no. 19, June 23, 1919: 340-41 and a full list of the firms visited in the Boletim: 33-4.Google Scholar
  32. 21.
    ‘Brazilian Tariff: Effect on Birmingham Exports’, Times Trade Supplement, July 26, 1919: 502; FBI, ‘Results of the Tour’, Boletim, 1919: 36.Google Scholar
  33. 22.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, ‘Cattle Industry of Brazil: Development of Meat Export’, Times Trade Supplement, July 19, 1919: 472; ‘Southern Brazil Cotton Growing: Cooperation with British Buyers Needed’, Times Trade Supplement, August 2, 1919, 529.Google Scholar
  34. 23.
    ‘Anglo-Brazilian Trade: Dr Calogeras Consulted by Parliamentary Committee’, Times Trade Supplement, August 2, 1919, 529.Google Scholar
  35. 24.
    Porto, O Brasil em Face, 27-8.Google Scholar
  36. 25.
    FO371/3654, 399–402: Note of Conference which took place at the Foreign Office on 7th August, with the Brazilian Delegation; Brazilian Chamber of Commerce in Great Britain, https://doi.org/brazilianchamber.org.uk/ (accessed June 18, 2011).
  37. 26.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, ‘Resultados da Missão á Inglaterra: Entrevistas Concedidas aos Jornaes do Rio de Janeiro, em Novembro de 1919 [Results of the Mission to Britain: Interviews Granted to the Newspapers of Rio de Janeiro in November 1919]’, in À Margem da Profissão: Discursos, Conferências, Publicações [On the Margin of the Profession: Speeches, Lectures, Publications], ed. Roberto C. Simonsen (São Paulo: São Paulo Editora, 1932), 100–03.Google Scholar
  38. 27.
    ‘Cotton-growing in Brazil: Climate and Soil Ideal’, Manchester Guardian, September 6, 1919; Roberto C. Simonsen, ‘Possibilidades Algodoeiras no Brasil [Potential for Cotton in Brazil]’, in his À Margem da Profissão, (São Paulo, 1932), 91–9Google Scholar
  39. 27a.
    Arno S. Pearse, Brazilian Cotton (Manchester: [s.n.], 1922)Google Scholar
  40. 27b.
    Arno S. Pearse, Cotton in North Brazil (Manchester: International Federation of Master Cotton Spinners’ and Manufacturers’ Associations, 1923).Google Scholar
  41. 28.
    Federation of British Industries. The Federation of British Industries: What It Is and What It Does (London: FBI, 1923); FBI, OTC, Minute Book, 63/f58.Google Scholar
  42. 29.
    Winston Fritsch, ‘The Montagu Financial Mission to Brazil and the Federal Economic Policy Changes of 1924’, Brazilian Economic Studies 9 (1985): 263–325Google Scholar
  43. 29a.
    M. de P. Abreu, The Niemeyer Mission: An Episode of British Financial Imperialism in Brazil (Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Centre of Latin American Studies, 1973).Google Scholar
  44. 30.
    FO371/3654, 368–373: Peel to Curzon, Rio de Janeiro, May 20, 1919.Google Scholar
  45. 31.
    FO371/3654, 385–386: Department of Overseas Trade to Foreign Office, London, July 2, 1919.Google Scholar
  46. 32.
    FO371/3654, 384: Mss. note on docket, 4/12, 1919.Google Scholar
  47. 33.
    Fritsch, ‘The Montagu Financial Mission’: 287-89.Google Scholar
  48. 34.
    ‘Sir A. Steel-Maitland Resigns: Work on Overseas Trade Hampered’, Times, July 9, 1919; ‘Sir A. Steel-Maitland on his Resignation: Difference with Sir A. Geddes’, Times, July 14, 1919; Arthur Steel-Maitland to the Editor of the Times, ‘Overseas Trade: Departmental Differences’, Times, July 26, 1919.Google Scholar
  49. 35.
    FO371/3654, 415: Department of Overseas Trade to Foreign Office, London, August 29, 1919.Google Scholar
  50. 36.
    Garcia, Anglo-American Rivalry, 9–10.Google Scholar
  51. 37.
    Porto, O Brasil em Face, 63.Google Scholar
  52. 38.
    Companhia Constructora de Santos, Relatorio, 1917.Google Scholar
  53. 39.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, ‘Pela Organização da Producção [For the Organisation of Production]’, in O Trabalho Moderno [Modern Work], ed. Roberto C. Simonsen (São Paulo: Secção de Obras de ‘Estado’, 1919), 17–29.Google Scholar
  54. 40.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, Orientação Industrial Brasileira [Brazilian Industrial Orientation] (São Paulo: [CIESP], 1928).Google Scholar
  55. 41.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, Crises, Finances and Industry (São Paulo: São Paulo Editora, 1931)Google Scholar
  56. 41a.
    Simonsen, Speech to the Assembleia Nacional Constituinte, January 30, 1934, Anais da Assembleia Nacional Constituinte, January 30, 1934, Câmara dos Deputados, https://doi.org/imagem.camara.gov.br/constituinte_principal.asp (accessed February 6, 2012)Google Scholar
  57. 41b.
    Simonsen, Aspects of National Political Economy (São Paulo: The Author, 1935)Google Scholar
  58. 41c.
    Simonsen, A Industria em Face da Economia Nacional [Industry and the National Economy] (São Paulo: Empresa Graphica da ‘Revista dos Tribunaes’, 1937)Google Scholar
  59. 41d.
    Simonsen, Brazil’s Industrial Evolution (São Paulo: Escola Livre de Sociologia e Política, 1939)Google Scholar
  60. 41e.
    Simonsen and Eugênio Gudin, A Controvérsia do Planejamento na Economia Brasileira: Coletânea da Polêmica Simonsen x Gudin [The Controversy Over the Planning of the Brazilian Economy: A Collection of the Simonsen vs. Gudin Polemic] (Rio de Janeiro: IPEA/INPES, 1977).Google Scholar
  61. 42.
    H.W. Arndt, The Rise and Fall of Economic Growth: A Study in Contemporary Thought (Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1978)Google Scholar
  62. 42a.
    H.W. Arndt, Economic Development: The History of an Idea (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 43.
    Roberto C. Simonsen, A Construcção dos Quarteis para o Exercito [The Construction of Barracks for the Army] (São Paulo: The Author, 1931).Google Scholar
  64. 44.
    Simonsen, ‘Resultados da Missão á Inglaterra’, 100.Google Scholar
  65. 45.
    Roberto Simonsen, Antonio Gontijo de Carvalho, and Francisco de Salles Oliveira, Pandiá Calogeras na Opinião de seus Contemporaneos [Pandiá Calogeras in the Opinion of his Contemporaries] (São Paulo: Siqueira 1934), 82.Google Scholar
  66. 46.
    Clovis de Oliveira, A Indústria e o Movimento Constitucionalista de 1932 [Industry and the Constitutionalist Movement of 1932] (São Paulo: Centro e Federação das Indústrias do Estado de S. Paulo, 1956).Google Scholar
  67. 47.
    ‘Mr Charles Murray: Anglo-Brazilian Trade’ [Obituary], Times, October 29, 1953; Robert G Greenhill, ‘Investment Group, Free-standing Company or Multinational? Brazilian Warrant, 1909–1952’, Business History 37, no.1 (1995): 86–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 48.
    Manoel de Cerqueira Daltro Filho, ‘Relatorio da Comissão de Inquerito sobre as transações do Instituto do Café’, Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo 44, no. 19 (January 25, 1934): 1–8.Google Scholar
  69. 49.
    Ernest Hambloch, British Consul: Memories of Thirty Years’ Service in Europe and Brazil (London: Harrap, 1938)Google Scholar
  70. 49a.
    Ernest Hambloch, Here and There: A Medley of Memories (London: Johnson, 1968).Google Scholar
  71. 50.
    FO371/3654, 399–413, 416–417: Note of Conference which took place at the Foreign Office on 7th August, with the Brazilian Mission; Department of Overseas Trade to Commercial Department, Foreign Office, London, August 15, 1919; Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to Comptroller General of Department of Overseas Trade, London, August 29, 1919; Copy of letter from Brazilian Mission to Sec. of State for Foreign Affairs, London, August 17, 1919; F.G.A. Butler to Brazilian Commercial Delegation, London, August 26, 1919.Google Scholar
  72. 51.
    Notes on the dust-jacket of Hambloch, Here.Google Scholar
  73. 52.
    Ernest Hambloch, His Majesty the President: A Study of Constitutional Brazil (London: Methuen, 1935).Google Scholar
  74. 53.
    Hambloch, British Consul, 278; Hambloch, Here, 175-80.Google Scholar
  75. 54.
    The title varied slightly from year to year but was essentially Report on the Economic and Financial Conditions in Brazil. The reports appeared before the First World War in the Parliamentary Papers and from 1921 onwards as a Department of Overseas Trade/HMSO publication.Google Scholar
  76. 55.
    He recalled being one of a group of choirboys presented to Queen Victoria on the steps of St Paul’s Cathedral after her Diamond Jubilee service in June 1897: Hambloch, Here, 37-8.Google Scholar
  77. 56.
    FO368/2073: HM Commercial Secretary of Legation, Rio de Janeiro, Despatch Overseas Trade No. 14, March 24, 1919.Google Scholar
  78. 57.
    Hambloch, His Majesty, 191-92.Google Scholar
  79. 58.
    Hambloch, Here, 211.Google Scholar
  80. 59.
    José Maria dos Santos, A Politica Geral do Brasil [General Politics of Brazil] (S. Paulo: J. Magalhães, 1930).Google Scholar
  81. 60.
    In contrast, Herman G. James, The Constitutional System of Brazil (Washington: Carnegie Institution, 1923 [2012 printing]) is more measured in recording reports of electoral fraud, the absence of political parties, military intervention, etc.Google Scholar
  82. 61.
    Hambloch, His Majesty, 1.Google Scholar
  83. 62.
    Sylvio Romero, Parlamentarismo e Presidencialismo na República Brasileira [Parliamentarianism and Presidentialism in the Brazilian Republic], 3.a ed. (Brasília: FUNCEP, 1987).Google Scholar
  84. 63.
    José Augusto Bezerra de Medeiros, ‘Porque sou Parlamentarista’ [1936] [Why I Support a Parliamentarianism], in Presidencialismo e Parlamentarismo [Presidentialism and Parliamentarianism], ed. José Augusto Bezerra de Medeiros (Brasília: FUNCEP, 1987), 13–44.Google Scholar
  85. 64.
    Hambloch, His Majesty, 191-3, Chapters 13–15.Google Scholar
  86. 65.
    Hélio Silva, 1935: A Revolta Vermelha [1935: The Red Revolt] (Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Civilização Brasileira, 1969), 99–103.Google Scholar
  87. 66.
    Gustavo Barroso, Brasil: Colonia de Banqueiros; História dos Emprestimos de 1824 a 1934 [Brazil: Colony of Bankers; History of the Loans from 1824 to 1934], 3.a ed. (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1935); ANL manifesto reprinted in Silva, 1935, 116.Google Scholar
  88. 67.
    Hambloch, Here, 211-18.Google Scholar
  89. 68.
    Brasil Libero [pseud.], Esmagando a Vibora!: Critica do Volume ‘His Majesty the President’ (Sua Magestade o Presidente): A Affronta ao Brasil! [Smashing the Viper!: Criticism of the Volume ‘His Majesty the President’: The Affront to Brazil!] 2.a ed. (Rio de Janeiro: Editorial Alba, 1935). The book went through at least three editions.Google Scholar
  90. 69.
    Hambloch, Here, 213.Google Scholar
  91. 70.
    ‘New Constitution for Brazil’, Times, November 11, 1937; Hambloch, British Consul: on the title-page he styled himself ‘Author of “His Majesty the President”’.Google Scholar
  92. 71.
    Hambloch, ‘The New Régime in Brazil’, Foreign Affairs 16 (April 1938): 484–93.Google Scholar
  93. 72.
    Hambloch, Here, 218.Google Scholar
  94. 73.
    G.R.C., review of His Majesty the President, Geographical Journal 86, no. 5 (November 1935): 474; Frederic William Ganzert, review of His Majesty the President, Hispanic American Historical Review 16, no. 3 (August 1936): 382-3; W.I.J., review of His Majesty the President, Public Administration, 14, no. 2 (April 1936): 219-20. See also W.S. Thatcher, review of His Majesty the President, Economic Journal, 45, no. 180 (December 1935): 772–3.Google Scholar
  95. 74.
    José Honório Rodrigues, ‘Hambloch, Cônsul Inglês, Jornalista e Brasilianista das Décadas Vinte e Trinta deste Século [Hambloch, British Consul, Journalist and Brazilianist of the 1920s and 1930s]’, in Sua Majestade o Presidente do Brasil: Um Estudo do Brasil Constitucional, 1889–1934 [His Majesty the President: A Study of Constitutional Brazil, 1889–1934], ed. Ernest Hambloch (Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 1981), 9–24.Google Scholar
  96. 75.
    José Serra, Reforma Política no Brasil: Parlamentarismo x Presidencialismo [Political Reform in Brazil: Parliamentarianism vs. Presidentialism], 3ed. (São Paulo: Editora Siciliano, 1993)Google Scholar
  97. 75b.
    Bolívar Lamounier and Dieter Nohlen, eds, Presidencialismo ou Parlamentarismo: Perspectivas sobre a Reorganização Institucional Brasileira [Presidentialism or Parliamentarianism: Perspectives on Brazilian Institutional Reorganisation] (São Paulo: Edições Loyola/IDESP, 1993).Google Scholar
  98. 76.
    Brazilian Constitutional Referendum, 1993: Wikipedia, https://doi.org/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_constitutional_referendum,_1993 (accessed June 23, 2012).
  99. 77.
    James Bryce, South America: Observations and Impressions (London: Macmillan, 1912).Google Scholar
  100. 78.
    Edmar Morel, A Revolta da Chibata [The Revolt of the Lash], 3.a (Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1979).Google Scholar
  101. 79.
    Bryce, South America, 411, 412.Google Scholar
  102. 80.
    Stefan Zweig, Brazil: Land of the Future (London: Cassell, 1942), 7–13.Google Scholar
  103. 81.
    Hambloch, His Majesty, 239.Google Scholar
  104. 82.
    Ibid., 236, 240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Board of Transatlantic Studies 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations