International Journal of Tropical Insect Science

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 214–217 | Cite as

Diversity and feeding behaviour of insects visiting Brachiaria ruziziensis (Poaceae)

  • Léonard S. T. NgamoEmail author
  • Fernand N. F. Tchuenguem
  • Gladys Mbofung
Short Communication


The diversity of visitors to flowers of the grass Brachiaria ruziziensis R. Germ and Evrard is very low in Ngaoundéré, Cameroon. Bees (Hymenoptera) and syrphids (Diptera) were observed gathering pollen, and each insect group had its own strategy depending on the prevailing environmental conditions. Syrphids are early-morning flower visitors and take time to feed on wet pollen. They visit flowers from 0630 h when the relative humidity is higher than 80% and temperature lower than 25°C Bees gather dry pollen from 0930 h when the relative humidity is < 50% and temperature > 30°C, and carry it to the nests for feeding.

Key words

pollen collection anthophilous insects Brachiaria ruziziensis syrphids bees temperature relative humidity Cameroon Poaceae 


La diversité de l’entomofaune floricole de Brachiaria ruziziensis R. Germ et Evrard est pauvre à Ngaoundéré au Cameroun. Les abeilles (Hymenoptera) et les syrphes (Diptera) exploitent le pollen de cette graminée. Les syrphes sont des visiteurs du point du jour se nourrissant du pollen humide et ils sont plus actifs à 6h30 quand l’humidité relative est supérieure à 80% et la température moins de 25°C Les abeilles qui sont actives après 9h30, (humidité relative < 50% et température > 30°C), collectent du pollen sec et l’emportent.

Mots clés

pollen insectes floricoles Brachiaria ruziziensis paturage température Poacée Cameroun 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Enders F. (1975) The influence of hunting manner on prey size, particularly in spiders with long attack distances (Araneidae, Linyphiidae and Salticidae). American Naturalist 109, 737–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Flottum P. K., Erickson E. H. Jr. and Hanny B. J. (1983) The honeybee-sweet corn relationship. American Bee Journal 123, 293–299.Google Scholar
  3. Gilbert E. S. (1981) The foraging ecology of hoverflies: Morphology of the mouthparts in relation to feeding on pollen and nectarine of some common urban species. Ecological Entomology 6, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffiths D. (1980) The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae: Prey capture, handling and utilisation. Journal of Animal Ecology 49, 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guinochet M. (1965) Notions fondamentales de botanique générale. Edition Masson and Cie, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Holloway B. A. (1979) Pollen feeding in hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 3, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lunau K. (1996) Signalling functions of floral colour patterns for insects flower visitors. Zoologischer Anzeiger 235 (1-2), 11–30.Google Scholar
  8. Pellmyr O. (1997) Pollinating seed-eaters: Why is active pollination so rare? Ecology 78, 1655–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Percival M. S. (1969) Floral Biology. Pergamon Press, UK and Robert Maxwell Pub., Paris.Google Scholar
  10. Proctor M., Yéo P. and Lack A. (1996) The natural history of pollination, The New Naturalist. Harper Collins Pub. Corbet S.A. Co. Eds., London.Google Scholar
  11. Rotheray G. E. (1993) Colour guide for hoverfly larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae). Dipterist Digest No. 9 (Edited by W. Derek). Sheffield England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICIPE 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Léonard S. T. Ngamo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fernand N. F. Tchuenguem
    • 1
  • Gladys Mbofung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of NgaoundéréNgaoundéréCameroon

Personalised recommendations