Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 68, Issue 6, pp 394–399 | Cite as

DNA fingerprinting analysis of red deer (Cervus elaphus L., 1758) populations from Bulgaria

  • Tsenka G. ChassovnikarovaEmail author
  • G. G. Markov
  • P. Müller
Short communication

Keywords

Cervus elaphus DNA fingerprinting genetic polymorphism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burke, T.; Hanotte, O.; Bruford, M. W.; Cairns, E. (1991): Multilocus and single locus minisatellite analysis in population biological studies. In: DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Ed. by T. Burke, G. Dolf, A. J. Jeffreys, and R. Wolf. Basel: Birkhäuserverlag. Pp. 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellegren, H.; Andersson, L.; Johansson, M.; Sandberg, K. (1992): DNA fingerprinting in horse using a simple (TG)n probe and its application to population comparisons. Animal Genetics 23, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Georges, M.; Lequarre, A. S.; Castelli, M.; Hanset, R.; Vassart, G. (1988): DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals using four different minisatellite probes. Cytogen. Cell Gen. 47, 127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbert, D. A.; Lehman, N.; O’Brien, S. J.; Wayne, R. K. (1990): Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentation in the Californian Channel Island fox. Nature 344, 764–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, D. A.; Packer, C.; Pusey, A. E.; Stephens, J. C.; O’Brien, S.J. (1991): Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: parentage, genetic diversity and kinship. J. Heredity 82, 378–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartl, G. B.; Markov, G. G. (1993): Genetic diversity in bulgarian deer species. Comptes rendus de l’Academie bulgare des Sciences 46, 89–92.Google Scholar
  7. Hartl, G. B.; Markov, G. G.; Rubin, A.; Findo, S.; Lang, G.; Willing, R. (1993): Allozyme diversity within and among populations og three ungulate species (Cervus elaphus, Capreolus capreolus, Sus scrofa) of Southeastern and Central Europe. Z. Sägetierkunde 58, 352–361.Google Scholar
  8. Hill, W. G. (1987): DNA fingerprinting applied to animal and bird populations. Nature 327, 98–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hillel, J.; Plotzy, Y.; Haberfeld, A.; Lavi, U.; Cahaner, A.; Jeffreys, A. J. (1989): DNA fingerprinting of poultry. Animal Genetics 20, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeffreys, A. J; Morton, D. B. (1987): DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats. Animal Genetics 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, C. S.; Lesells, C. M.; Krebs, J. R. (1991): Helpers at the nest in european bee-eaters (Merops apiaster): a genetic analysis. In: DNA Fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Ed. by T. Burke, G. Dolf, A. J. Jeffreys, and R. Wolf. Basel: Birkhäuserverlag. Pp. 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lagoda, P. J. L.; Seitz, G.; Epplen, J. T.; Issinger, O. G. (1988): Increased detectability of somatic changes in the DNA from human tumors after probing with “synthetic” and “genome-derived” hypervariable multilocus probes. Human Genetics 84, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lynch, M. (1988): Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 584–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lynch, M. (1990): The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5, 478–484.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, M. (1991): Analysis of population genetic stricture by DNA Fingerprinting. In: DNA fingerprinting: approaches and applications. Ed. by T. Burke, G. Dolf, A. J. Jeffreys, and R. Wolf. Basel: Birkhäuserverlag. Pp. 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mörsch, G. (1992): DNA fingerprinting von Rehen aus natürlichen Populationen und von immortalisierten Zellinien. Diss. thesis, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
  17. Mörsch, G.; Leibenguth, F. (1993): DNA finger-printing of the roe deer, Capreolus capreolus L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 104B, 229–233.Google Scholar
  18. Mörsch, G.; Leibenguth, F. (1994): DNA fingerprinting in roe deer using the digoxigenated probe (GTG)5. Animal Genetics 25, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poeche, H.; Peters, C.; Wrobel, G.; Schneider, V.; Epplen, J. T. (1991): Determining consanguinity by oligonucleotide fingerprinting with (GTG)5/(CAC)5. Electrophoresis 12, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruth, J. L.; Fain, R. S. (1993): The “induvidualization” of large North American mammals. In: DNA Fingerprinting: State of science. Ed. by D. J. Pena, R. Chakraborty, J. T. epplen, and A. J. Jeffreys. Basel: Birkhäuserverlag. Pp. 268–305.Google Scholar
  21. Schaefer, R.; Zischler, H.; Birsner, U.; Becker, A.; Epplen, J. T. (1988): Optimized oligonucleotide probes for DNA fingerprinting. Electrophoresis 9, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wirgin, I. I.; Grunwald, C.; Garte, S. J. (1991): Use of DNA fingerprinting in the identification and management of a striped bass population in the southeastern United States. Transact. American Fish. Soc. 120, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tsenka G. Chassovnikarova
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. G. Markov
    • 1
  • P. Müller
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of ZoologyThe Bulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Institute für BiogeographieUniversität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations