Advertisement

Mammalian Biology

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 188–192 | Cite as

Cytogenetics and distribution of two new karyomorphs of the Ctenomys pearsoni complex (Rodentia, Octodontidae) from southern Uruguay

  • A. Novello
  • C. Altuna
Short communication

Keywords

Ctenomys karyotypes geographical barrier 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altuna, C. A.; Lessa, E. P. (1985): Penial morphology in Uruguayan species of Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae). X Mammalogy 66, 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S.; Yates, T. L.; Cook, J.A. (1987): Notes on Bolivian mammals 4: the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae) in the eastern lowlands. Am. Mus. Novitates 2891, 1–20.Google Scholar
  3. Bier, R.; Lopez, E.; Norbis, W.; Pagano, D. (1980): La desembocadura del arroyo Solís Grande en el Río de la Piata. Res. Com. Jorn. C. Nat. Monte video 1, 119–120.Google Scholar
  4. D’elía, G.; Ubilla, M.; Altuna, C. A. (1992): Características discriminantes y morfofuncionales de la pelvis en poblaciones de Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) del Uruguay. Bol. Soc. Zool. Uruguay, 2a. época, 7, 41–42.Google Scholar
  5. Freitas, T. R. O. (1994): Geographical variation of heterochromatin in Ctenomys flamarioni (Rodentia, Octodontidae) and its cytogenetic relationships with other species of the genus. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 67, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freitas, T. R. O.; Lessa, E. P (1984): Cytogenetics and morphology of Ctenomys torquatus (Rodentia Octodontidae). J. Mammalogy 64, 637–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallardo, M. H. (1979): Las especies chilenas de Ctenomys. I. Estabilidad cariotípica. Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. 12, 71–82.Google Scholar
  8. Gallardo, M. H. (1991): Karyotypic evolution in Ctenomys (Rodentia Ctenomydae). X Mammalogy 79, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kiblisky, P.; Brum-Zorrilla, N.; Perez, G.; Sáez, F. A. (1979): Variabilidad cromosómica entre diversas poblaciones del roedor cavador del gènero Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae). Mendeliana 2, 85–93.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, M. R.; Elder, F. F. B. (1980): Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigation. Cytogenet. Celi Genet. 26, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nevo, E. (1979): Adaptive convergence and divergence of subterranean mammals. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 269–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nevo, E.; Filipucci, M. G.; Redi, C.; Simson, S.; Heth, G.; Beiles, A. (1995): Karyotype and genetic evolution in speciation of subterranean mole rats of the genus Spalax in Turkey. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Novello, A.; Sambarino, C. (1987): Dos nuevos cariotipos del género Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae) del Uruguay. Res. III Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoologia. Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba.Google Scholar
  14. Novello, A.; Lessa, E. R. (1986) G-band homology in two karyomorphs of the Ctenomys pearsoni complex (Rodentia Octodontidae) of neotropical fossorial rodents. Z. Säugetierkunde 51, 378–380.Google Scholar
  15. Novello, A.; Lessa, E. P.; Sambarino, C.; Mon-Zon, S. (1990): Chromosomal variation in two populations of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae) from Uruguay. Z. Säugetierkunde 55, 43–48.Google Scholar
  16. Novello, A.; Cortinas, M. N.; Suárez, M., Musto, H. (1996): Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of the satellite DNA of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae) from Uruguay. Chromosome Res. 4, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patton, I. L.; Smith, M. F (1990): The evolutionary dynamics of the pocketgopher, Thomomys bottae, with emphasis on California populations. Univ. California Pubi. Zool. 123, 1–161.Google Scholar
  18. Prost, M. T. (1982): Héritages quaternaires et evolution geomorphologique des bords du Rio de la Piata en Uruguay. Diss. thesis, Univ. Paris VII.Google Scholar
  19. Reig, O. A.; Kiblisky, R (1969): Chromosome multiformity in the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia Octodontidae). A progress report. Chromosoma 28, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reig, O. A.; Busch, C.; Ortells, M. O.; Contreras, J. R. (1990): An overview of evolution, systematics, population structure, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in Ctenomys. In: Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels. Ed. by E. Nevo and O. A. Reig. New York: Wiley-Alan R. Liss. Pp. 71–96.Google Scholar
  21. Seabrigth, M. (1971): A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2. 971–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, M. F.; Patton, J. L.; Hafner, J. C.; Hafner, D. J. (1983): Thomomys bottae pocket gophers of the centrai Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico: local differentiation, gene flow, and historical biogeography. Occ. Pap. Mus. Southwestern Biol., Univ. New Mexico 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. Smolen, M. I.; Bickham, J. W. (1995): Phylogenetic implications of chromosome evolution in Geomys. J. Mammalogy 76, 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sprechmann, R (1978): The Paleoecology and Paleogeography of the Uruguayan coastal area during the Neogene and Quaternary. Zitteliana München 4, 3–72.Google Scholar
  25. Wilkins, K. T (1987): A zoogeographic analysis of variation in recent Geomys pinetis (Geomyidae) in Florida. Bull. Florida State Mus., Biol. Sci. 30, 1–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Säugetierkunde 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Novello
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. Altuna
    • 1
  1. 1.Sección Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay
  2. 2.Sección Etología, FacuItad de CienciasUniversidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations