An abiding antagonism: realism, idealism and the mirage of western–Russian partnership after the Cold War
- 554 Downloads
Europe’s security environment is critically dependent on nature of the relationship between Russia and the broader west. What are the obstacles in the way of a stable partnership? Against the conventional wisdom that foregrounds domestic politics, we establish the importance of an abiding clash of definitions of national interest on both sides. The US and Russian strategic perspectives draw on the modern historical experience of both sides, are consistent with well-established international relations theories and are independent of particular personalities such as Putin’s. We demonstrate that though personalities, ideas and contingency played their roles, these basic clashing perspectives existed even during the euphoric days of the Cold War’s end. Success in negotiating an improvement in USA–Russian relations will require a pragmatic compromise between deeply divergent interests. Stable economic and political relations may be possible, but the first step in attaining it is recognizing the scale of the challenge.
KeywordsUSA–Russian relations Russian Foreign Policy US Foreign Policy Geopolitics EU–Russia NATO enlargement Russian worldview New Cold War
- Bozo, Frederic, Andreas Roedder, and Mary Sarotte, eds., 2016. German unification: An international history (Routledge).Google Scholar
- Chernyaev, Anatoly. 1997. Obiedineniie Germanii. Politicheskie mekhanizmy i psikhologicheskiie stereotypy. Svobodnaia mysl 8: 25–34.Google Scholar
- Dunham, Will. 2014. Kerry condemns Russia’s ‘incredible act of aggression’ in Ukraine” Reuters Mar 2, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-usa-kerry-idUSBREA210DG20140302.
- Goldgeier, James. 1999. Not whether but when: The U. S. decision to enlarge NATO. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
- Goldgeier, James, and Michael McFaul. 2003. Power and purpose. U. S. Policy towards Russia after the cold war. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
- Graham, Thomas, and Matthew Rojansky. 2016. America’s Russia policy has failed. Foreign policy, October 13. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/13/americas-russia-policy-has-failed-clinton-trump-putin-ukraine-syria-how-to-fix/.
- Ikenberry, John. 2000. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Keohane, Robert O., and Celeste A. Wallander. 1999. Imperfect unions: Security institutions over time and space. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Keohane, Robert O. 2001. Governance in a partially globalized world. American Political Science Review 95 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
- Keohane, Robert O. 2012. Hegemony and after: Knowns and unknowns in the debate over decline. Foreign Affairs 91 (4): 117–118.Google Scholar
- Leffler, Melvyn P. 2007. For the Soul od Mankind. The United States, the Svoiet Union, and the cold war. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
- Lieven, Dominic. 2000. Empire: The Russian empire and its rivals. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton.Google Scholar
- Mearsheimer, J.J. 2014 Why the ukraine crisis is the west’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs. Google Scholar
- Poe, Marshall. 2003. The Russian Moment in World History. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sestanovich, Steven. 2014. Maximalist: America in the world from Truman to Obama. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Shiraev, Eric, and Vladislav Zubok. 2000. Anti-Americanism in Russia; from Stalin to Putin. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Snyder, Jack. 1991. Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Traynor, I. 2014. Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin has lost the plot, says German chancellor. Guardian Monday 3 March 2014 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/03/ukraine-vladimir-putin-angela-merkel-russian.
- Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politcs. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Wohlforth, W.C. 1993. The elusive balance: Power and perceptions in the cold war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Zubok, Vladislav. 2003. Gorbachev and the end of the cold war: Different perspectives on the historical personality. In Cold war endgame: Oral history. Analysis, debates, ed. William C. Wohlforth. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
- Zubok, Vladislav. 2007. A failed empire. The Soviet Union in the cold war from Stalin to Gorbachev. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Zubok, Vladislav. 2016. Russia, the US, and the backstory behind the breakdown. The Wilson Quarterly, Winter.Google Scholar