Advertisement

International Politics

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 503–518 | Cite as

A European Union global strategy for a changing world?

  • Karen E. Smith
Original Article

Abstract

The EU agreed a ‘global strategy on foreign and security policy’ in June 2016, in the midst of unprecedented turmoil within the EU and outside it. This article begins with a discussion of what ‘strategy’ entails, and the challenges of strategising in the EU. It then traces the development of the EU global strategy, focusing on why it was considered to be necessary, and summarises its content. Finally, the article analyses the new strategy in terms of clarity of strategic objectives, specification of resources dedicated to the pursuit of those objectives, and provision for monitoring of progress made in achieving the objectives. The global strategy provides a more ‘realist’ guide for EU foreign and security policy in the near future, but Brexit presents a severe challenge to implementing it in a world in which EU influence is increasingly resisted or contested.

Keywords

Brexit European Union foreign and security policy EU global strategy Strategy 

References

  1. Amnesty International. 2016. Egypt: Unprecedented Crackdown on NGOs, 23 March. https://www.amnesty.org/en/press-releases/2016/03/egypt-unprecedented-crackdown-on-ngos/.
  2. Autessere, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaumont, Peter. 2016. Israel passes law to force NGOs to reveal foreign funding. The Guardian, 12 July.Google Scholar
  4. Bendiek, Annegret, and Heinz Kramer. 2010. The EU as a strategic international actor. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (4): 453–474.Google Scholar
  5. Bendiek, Annegret. 2016. The global strategy for the EU’s foreign and security policy, SWP Comments 38, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  6. Bicchi, Federica, Nicola Chelotti, Spyros Economides, and Karen E. Smith. 2015. Response to call for evidence, House of Lords EU External Affairs Sub-Committee ‘The Strategic Review of the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy’, 29 September. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/eu-external-affairs-subcommittee/strategic-review-of-the-eus-foreign-and-security-policy/written/21950.html.
  7. Biscop, Sven. 2005. The European security strategy: A global agenda for positive power. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Biscop, Sven. 2012. Raiders of the lost art: Strategy-making in Europe, Egmont Security Policy Brief no. 4. Brussels: Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.Google Scholar
  9. Biscop, Sven. 2016. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European characteristics. Egmont Security Policy Brief no. 75.Google Scholar
  10. Caprara, Maurizio. 2016. Mogherini: “Dopo lo choc del voto britannico occorre ridare fiducia. Corriere della Sera.Google Scholar
  11. Chaban, N., O. Elsgtrom, and M. Holland. 2007. The European Union in the eyes of others, Special Issue of European Foreign Affairs Review, 12 (3).Google Scholar
  12. Council of the European Union. 2016. Implementation plan on security and defence, 14 November, document no. 14392/16.Google Scholar
  13. Council of Foreign Ministers. 1992. Report to the European Council in Lisbon on the Likely Development of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), Annex to the Conclusions of the Presidency, Lisbon, European Council, EC Bulletin no. 6.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. 2013. Action plan for resilience in crisis prone countries 2013–2020, SWD (2013) 227.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2014. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, A global actor in search of a strategy: European Union Foreign Policy between bilateralism and multilateralism. European Commission document EUR 26572 EN.Google Scholar
  16. European Council. 1988. ‘Declaration by the European Council on the International Role of the European Community (The Rhodes Declaration), Rhodes, 3 December 1988’, document no. 2/17. In European Foreign Policy: Key Documents, eds. Christopher Hill and Karen E. Smith, 149–151. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. European Council. 2013. Conclusions, 20 December 2013, document EUCO 217/13. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/european-council-conclusions-december-2013.
  18. European Council. 2015. Conclusions, 25–26 June, document EUCO 22/15 (http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-22-2015-INIT/en/pdf.
  19. European External Action Service. 2015. The European Union in a changing global environment: A more connected, contested and complex world, 25 June. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/strategic-review-european-union-changing-global-environment.
  20. European Union. 2003. A secure Europe in a better world: European security strategy. Brussels. Google Scholar
  21. European Union. 2008. Report on the implementation of the European Security strategy, European Union, ‘Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy—Providing Security in a Changing World’, Brussels 11 December, document S407/08.Google Scholar
  22. European Union. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/eugs_review_web.pdf.
  23. Freedman, Lawrence. 2013. Strategy: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldgeier, James, and Jeremi Suri. 2015. Revitalizing the U.S. National Security Strategy. The Washington Quarterly 38 (4): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hampton, Mary N. 2000. ”The past, the present and the perhaps”: Is Germany a “normal” power? Security Studies 10 (2): 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill, Christopher. 2004. Renationalising or regrouping: EU foreign policy since 11 September 2001. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffmann, Stanley. 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus 95 (3): 862–915.Google Scholar
  28. Holslag, Jonathan. 2011. The elusive axis: Assessing the EU–China strategic partnership. Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (2): 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howorth, Jolyon. 2010. The EU as a global actor: Grand strategy for a global grand bargain? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (3): 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Human Rights Watch. 2016. Russia: Government vs Rights Groups, 22 September. https://www.hrw.org/russia-government-against-rights-groups-battle-chronicle.
  31. Hyde-Price, Adrian. 2008. A “tragic actor”? A realist perspective on “ethical power Europe”. International Affairs 84 (1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. International Affairs Institute, Polish Institute of International Affair, Elcano Royal Institute, and Swedish Institute of International Affairs. 2013. Towards a European Global Strategy: Securing European Influence in a Changing World. http://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=13792.
  33. Kausch, Kristina. 2016. The EU global strategy in the Shadow of Brexit, Carnegie Europe, 7 July. http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=64034.
  34. Laatikainen, Katie Verlin. 2010. Multilateral Leadership at the UN after the Lisbon Treaty. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (4): 475–493.Google Scholar
  35. Maull, Hanns W. 2016. Sadly, the EUGS reads more like a symptom of the problem than part of a solution to Europe’s deep crisis. The International Spectator 51 (3): 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyer, Christoph O. 2005. Convergence towards a European strategic culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms. European Journal of International Relations 11 (4): 523–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mogherini, Federica. 2016. Remarks made in the video on the EU global strategy, on the EUGS homepage. http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/.
  38. Müller, Patrick. 2016. EU foreign policy: No major breakthrough despite multiple crises. Journal of European Integration 38 (3): 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pacheco Pardo, Ramon. 2012. Normal power Europe: Non-proliferation and the normalization of EU’s foreign policy. Journal of European Integration 34 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pomorska, Karolina, and Sophie Vanhoonacker. 2016. Europe as a global actor: Searching for a new strategic approach. Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review of the European Union in 2015 54 (1): 204–217.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, Karen E. 2013. The European Union and the politics of legitimisation at the United Nations. European Foreign Affairs Review 18 (1): 63–80.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, Karen E. 2014. European Union foreign policy in a changing world, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, Daniel C. 2012. Still punching below its weight? Coherence and effectiveness in European Union foreign policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3): 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tocci, Nathalie. 2015. Towards an EU global strategy. In Towards an EU global strategy: Background, process, references, ed. Antonio Missiroli. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Tocci, Nathalie. 2016. The making of the global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. UK. 2010. HM government, ‘A Strong Britain in an Age of Uncertainty: The National Security Strategy’, Cm 7953.Google Scholar
  47. Van Ham, Peter. 2016. The EU’s “Caoutchouc” strategy: Something for everyone. The International Spectator 51 (3): 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wagner, Wolfgang, and Rosanne Anholt. 2016. Resilience as the EU global strategy’s new leitmotif: Pragmatic, problematic or promising? Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallace, William (forthcoming). European Diplomacy since the Cold War: How ambitious? How inhibited?’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations.Google Scholar
  50. Wetzel, Anne, and Jan Orbie. 2011. With map and compass on narrow paths and through shallow waters: Discovering the substance of EU democracy promotion. European Foreign Affairs Review 16 (5): 705–725.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Relations DepartmentLSELondonUK

Personalised recommendations