International Politics

, Volume 53, Issue 6, pp 689–707 | Cite as

The world after Brexit: From British referendum to global adventure

  • Tim OliverEmail author
Original Article


The decision by a majority of the British people to leave the European Union was in turn shocking insofar as few experts saw the ‘Leave’ camp winning, unprecedented insofar as no other country has ever tried to leave the European Union before, and deeply upsetting to the rest of the international community who with one notable exception had been banking on the UK staying inside the European Union. Interpreted by various pundits after the event as being either a revolt against globalisation, a rejection of an austerity regime that had left many on that proverbial trash heap of history, or quite simply a nativist rejection of all things foreign, there is little doubt that the consequences of what happened on June 23rd will be both long-lasting and potentially disturbing for the UK in particular and the rest of the world in general. But as this article seeks to show the decision itself, and the determination by the new British government to makes sure that “Brexit means Brexit”, leaves nearly every question unanswered. It is of course perfectly reasonable to think of what has happened – and might happen in the future – as ‘events’. But it is by now becoming perfectly clear that the actual withdrawal of Britain from the EU itself will be less an event and more a process in which all manner of outcomes are possible. Indeed, as this article shows, the process will unfold through multiple overlapping negotiations, which will take place at various levels of policy making and involve numerous political actors. The outcome may possibly be the benign one forecast by the Leave campaign. On the other hand, there are plenty of opportunities for a breakdown in relations in UK politics, between the UK and the EU, and in European geopolitics with international implications. But whether this happens or not depends now on a series of complex negotiations. The purpose here is to discuss these in some detail identifying the main actors, the key issues and possible outcomes.


Brexit European Union United Kingdom Scotland Article 50 European integration European geopolitics 



This article is based on an LSE IDEAS Strategic Update. The author is grateful to the editors for permission to reproduce that material here.


  1. Barnett, A. (2016) It’s England’s Brexit. OpenDemocracy, 4 June 2016,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  2. Barrett, A., Bergin, A., FitzGerald, J., Lambert, D., McCoy, D., Morgenroth, E., Siedschlag, I. and Studnicka, Z. (2015) Scoping the possible Economic Implications of Brexit on Ireland. Dublin: ESRI Research Series: The Economic and Social Research Institute,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  3. Beauchamp, Z (2016) Brexit isn’t about economics. It’s about xenophobia. Vox World, 24 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  4. Boffey, D. and Helm, T. (2016) Pro-EU Labour and Tory MPs look at forming new centrist party. The Guardian, 9 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  5. BrexitVote blog (2016) European views on the Brexit negotiations. London: LSE BrexitVote blog, 25 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  6. Chalmers, D. and Menon, A. (2016) Getting out quick and playing the long game. London: Open Europe Briefing 07/2016,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  7. Cooper, C. (2016) EU referendum: MPs may push to keep UK in European single market despite Brexit vote. The Independent, 6 June.Google Scholar
  8. David, J. (2016) Brexit wound: UK vote makes EU decline ‘practically irreversible’, Soros says. CNBCS, 26 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  9. de France, O. and Witney, N. (2013) Europe’s Strategic Cacophony. London: ECFR Policy Brief, April,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  10. Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T., and Van Reenen, J. (2016) The consequences of Brexit for UK trade and living standards. London: LSE Centre for Economic Performance, CEP Brexit Analysis No. 2,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  11. Dorman, A. (2014) More than a storm in a teacup: The defence and security implications of Scottish independence. International Affairs 90(3): 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas-Scot, S. (2014) British withdrawal from the EU: An existential threat to the United Kingdom? London: Centre on Constitutional Change, 24 October,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  13. Eurostat (2011) Population projections 2010-2060. Brussels: Eurostat, 8 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  14. FEPS (2016) Europeans and Brexit. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies, 18 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  15. Fordham, T. and Techau, J. (2016) Global Political Risk: the new convergence between geopolitical and vox populi risks, and why it matters. Citi GPS, January 2016,Google Scholar
  16. Foreign Affairs Committee (2016) Equipping the Government for Brexit. London: House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, Second Report, HC 431, 20 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  17. Glencross, A. (2015) Why a British referendum on EU membership will not solve the European question. International Affairs, 91(2), 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodwin, M. (2015) UKIP: Inside the Campaign to Redraw the Map of British Politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  19. Goodwin, M. (2016) Brexit: Identity trumps economics in revolt against elites. FT, 24 June.Google Scholar
  20. Gower, P. (2016) Brexit Article 50 challenge to quickly move to Supreme Court. Bloomberg, 19 July,, accessed on 30 July 2016.
  21. Grant, C. (2016a) How Brexit is changing the EU’ CER, Bulletin Article, 15 July 2016,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  22. Grant, C. (2016b) Theresa May and her six pack of difficult deals. London: CER, insight, 28 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  23. Hemming, J. (2016) US Views: selective and ambivalent thinking. In T. Oliver (ed.) New Challenges, new voices: next generation viewpoints on transatlantic relations. London: LSE IDEAS Special Report 22. pp. 62–69,,-New-Voices.pdf, accessed 30 July 2016.
  24. Home Affairs Committee (2016) The work of the Immigration Directorates (Q1 2016) London: House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, Sixth Report, HC 151, 27 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  25. Irwin, G. (2015) Brexit: the impact on the UK and the EU. London: Global Counsel,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  26. Krastev, I. and Leonard, M. (2010) The Spectre of a Multipolar Europe. London: ECFR, October,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  27. Kundanani, H. (2011) Germany as a geo-economic power. Washington Quarterly, 34(3), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kupchan, C. (2014) The Geopolitical Implications of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Washington D.C.: Transatlantic Academy, Analysis, June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  29. Mayor of London (2016) Sadiq Khan: London needs stronger voice and new powers to boost growth. Mayor of London press release, 26 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  30. McGough, L. and Piazza, G. (2016) 10 years of tax: how cities contribute to the national exchequer. London: Centre for Cities, 7 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  31. Miller, V. (2016) EU referendum: the process of leaving the EU. London: House of Commons Library briefing paper, No. 7551, 8 April,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  32. Möller, A. and Oliver, T. (eds.) (2014), The United Kingdom and the European Union: What would a “Brexit” mean for the EU and other States around the World? Berlin: Deutsche Gesellschaft für auswärtige Politik e.V., No 16,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  33. Morillas, P. (2016) The Brexit Scenarios: towards a new UK-EU relationship, CIDOB, June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  34. BBC News (2016) Brexit: PM is ‘willing to listen to options’ on Scotland. BBC News, 15 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  35. Niblett, R. (2016) Mutual misunderstandings risk compounding the UK-EU split. London: Chatham House, 8 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  36. Nixon, S. (2016) Bracing for the turmoil of a potential Brexit. The Wall Street Journal, 12 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  37. North, R. (ed.) Flexcit: A plan for leaving the European Union. Leave Alliance,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  38. Novotná, T. (2016) European View: Four Reasons Why TTIP May Fail and Why It Will be Europe’s Fault. In Oliver, T. (ed.) New Challenges, new voices: next generation viewpoints on transatlantic relations. London: LSE IDEAS Special Report 22. pp. 62–69,,-New-Voices.pdf, accessed 30 July 2016.
  39. Oliver, T. (2014) Londoners are not Little Englanders. LSE British Politics and Policy blog, 17 March 2014,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  40. Oliver, T. (2015a) To be or not to be in Europe: Is that the question? Britain’s European question and an in/out referendum. International Affairs 91(1): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliver, T. (2015b) How the EU responds to a British withdrawal will be determined by 5 key factors. LSE BrexitVote blog, 3 December,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  42. Oliver, T. (2016a) A European Union without the UK: The geopolitics of a British exit from the EU. London, UK: LSE IDEAS Strategic Update no., 16, 1.Google Scholar
  43. Oliver, T. (2016b) Why the EU referendum will not be the end of the story. London, UK: Federal Trust, February,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  44. Oliver, T. and Williams, M.J. (2016) Special relationships in flux: Brexit and the future of the US-EU and US-UK relationships. International Affairs, 92(3), 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peterkin, T. (2016) Nicola Sturgeon set for Brussels talks with Martin Schulz. The Scotsman, 28 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  46. Piris, J. (2016) If the UK votes to leave: the seven alternatives to EU membership. Centre for European Reform, 12 January,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  47. Portland (2016) Soft Power 30 – A ranking of global soft power. London: Portland Communications,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  48. Posener, A. (2016) Germans need to get real on Brexit. Carnegie Europe, 16 June,, accessed on 30 July 2016.
  49. Rankin, J. (2016) Liberal Democrats will fight election on halting Brexit, says Farron. The Guardian, 28 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  50. Renwick, A. (2016) Does the Prime Minister have to trigger Brexit talks under Article 50 after a vote to leave the EU? The UCL Constitution Unit blog, 23 February,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  51. Riley-Smith, B. (2016) Britain commits 650 troops to Nato’s Baltic forces to counter Vladimir Putin. The Telegraph, 8 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  52. Ruparel, R. (2016) Priorities for the new Department for International Trade post-Brexit. London: Open Europe, 27 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  53. Shipman, T. and Pancevski, B. (2016) Tories warn May over Brexit lite. The Times, 24 July, accessed 30 July 2016.
  54. Smith, J. and Tsatsas, M. (2002) The New Bilateralism: The UK’s Relations with the EU. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  55. Stephens, P. (2016) Britain is starting to imitate Greece. FT, 30 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  56. Strong, J. (2016) The Brexit debate is far from over: there will have to be a further vote. LSE BrexitVote blog, 24 June,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  57. Techau, J. (2014) Europe torn apart in the Asian century? Carnegie Europe, 1 July,, accessed 30 July 2016.
  58. Uberoi, E. (2016) European Union Referendum 2016. London: House of Commons, briefing paper, CBP 7639, 29 June.Google Scholar
  59. Vollaard, H. (2014) Explaining European disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1142–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. von Ondarza, N. (2013) Strengthening the Core or Splitting Europe? Prospects and Pitfalls of a Strategy of Differentiated Integration. Berlin: SWP Research Paper, RP 2.Google Scholar
  61. Webber, D. (2014) How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations 20(2): 341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright, T. (2013) Europe’s lost decade. Survival 55(6): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LSE IDEASLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations