Advertisement

The impact of ownership structure on earnings quality: the case of South Korea

  • Abiot Tessema
  • Moo Sung Kim
  • Jagadish Dandu
Original Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of business group ownership structure on the quality of earnings reporting using data from South Korea. In addition, we investigate the impact of ownership disparity and family ownership on earnings quality reporting. Using a self-constructed earnings quality index as a measure of earnings quality, we found that business group ownership structure is significantly associated with higher earnings quality. The result suggests that strong monitoring mechanisms introduced by the government, which are necessary for credibility in external financial markets and beneficial to business group reputation, led to increased transparency in earnings reports. We also found that disparity in ownership between control and cash flow rights in firms, as well as family ownership in group firms, was both associated with lower earnings quality.

Keywords

Business group Ownership structure Earnings quality South Korea 

JEL Classification

M41 M42 M48 

References

  1. Anderson, R., and D. Reeb. 2003. Founding-family ownership and family performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance 58: 1301–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R., A. Duru, and D. Reeb. 2009. Founders, heirs, and corporate opacity in the United States. Journal of Financial Economics 92: 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in U.K. private firms: Comparative loss recognition. Journal of Accounting and Economics 38: 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty, A., and D. Harris. 1999. The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of Accounting Studies 4: 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, J., Y. Cho, and H. Shin. 2007. The change in corporate transparency of Korean firms after the Asian financial crisis: an analysis using analysts’ forecast data. Corporate Governance 15: 1144–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, C., K. Hung, H. Cheng, and P. Lieu. 2015. Family firms and earnings management in Taiwan: Influence of corporate governance. International Review of Economics and Finance 36: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choe, S., and C. Pattnaik. 2007. The transformation of Korean business groups after the Asian crisis. Journal of Contemporary Asia 37: 232–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claessens, S., J. Fan, and L. Lang. 2006. The benefit and costs of group affiliation: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review 7: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coelho, A., F. Galdi, and A. Lopes. 2017. Determinants of asymmetric loss recognition timeliness in public and private firms in Brazil. Emerging Markets Review 31: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dechow, P., and I. Dichev. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review 77: 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E., and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, P., and T. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79: 967–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gopalan, R., and S. Jayaraman. 2012. Private control benefits and earnings management: Evidence from insider controlled firms. Journal of Accounting Research 50: 117–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2000. Tunneling. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 90: 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, K., and S. Kwon. 2002. Ownership structure and earnings informativeness: Evidence from Korea. The International Journal of Accounting 37: 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang, E. 2000. Segyehwa reform of the South Korean development state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable? An analysis of Indian business groups. Journal of Finance 55: 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khanna, T., and J. Rivkin. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22: 45–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, J., and C. Yi. 2006. Ownership structure, business group affiliation, listing status, and earnings management: evidence from Korea. Contemporary Accounting Research 23: 427–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. La Porta, F., F. L’opez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54: 471–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. La Porta, F., F. L’opez-De-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57: 1147–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, J. 2008. The politics of Chaebol reform in Korea: Social cleavage and new financial rules. Journal of Contemporary Asia 38: 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee, S., K. Park, and H. Shin. 2009. Disappearing internal capital markets: Evidence from diversified business group in Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance 33: 326–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69: 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, T., and N. Zaiats. 2017. Information environment and earnings management of dual class firms around the world. Journal of Banking & Finance 74: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murillo, D., and Y. Sung. 2013. Understating Korean capitalism: Chaebols and their corporate governance. ESADEgeo-Center for global economy and geopolitics 33: 1–11.Google Scholar
  30. Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23: 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prencipe, A., and S. Bar-Yosef. 2011. Corporate governance and earnings management in family-controlled companies. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 26: 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shin, H., and Y. Park. 1999. Financial constraints and internal capital markets: Evidence from Korean chaebols. Journal of Corporate Finance 5: 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, D. 2006. Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Research 44: 619–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warfield, T., J. Wild, and K. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang, Y., Q. Kweh, and R. Lin 2013. Earnings quality of business group firms: Evidence from Taiwan. In International Conference on Accounting and Finance (AT). Proceedings, 76–85. Singapore.Google Scholar
  37. Yang, Y., Q. Kweh, and R. Lin. 2014. Earnings quality of Taiwanese group firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 134–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zayed University College of BusinessAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Zayed University College of BusinessDubaiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations