Advertisement

IMF Economic Review

, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp 144–188 | Cite as

Is it the “How” or the “When” that Matters in Fiscal Adjustments?

  • Alberto Alesina
  • Gualtiero Azzalini
  • Carlo Favero
  • Francesco Giavazzi
  • Armando Miano
Research Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Using data from 16 OECD countries from 1981 to 2014 we study the effects on output of fiscal adjustments as a function of the composition of the adjustment—that is, whether the adjustment is mostly based on spending cuts or on tax hikes—and of the state of the business cycle when the adjustment is implemented. We find that both the “how” and the “when” matter, but the heterogeneity related to the composition is more robust across different specifications. Adjustments based upon permanent spending cuts are consistently much less costly than those based upon permanent tax increases. Our results are generally not explained by different reactions of monetary policy. However, when the domestic central bank can set interest rates—that is outside of a currency union—it appears to be able to dampen the recessionary effects of consolidations implemented during a recession.

JEL Classification

E62 H60 

References

  1. Alesina, Alberto, Carlo Favero, and Francesco Giavazzi. 2015. “The Output Effect of Fiscal Consolidation Plans.” Journal of International Economics 96(S1): S19–S42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, Alberto, Omar Barbiero, Carlo Favero, Francesco Giavazzi, and Matteo Paradisi. 2017. “The Effects of Fiscal Consolidations: Theory and Evidence,” Working Paper N. 23385, National Bureau of Economic Research May 2017.Google Scholar
  3. AMECO, AMECO-ECFIN Annual Macroeconomic Database. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/ameco (Accessed on 14 July 2016 for “Final consumption expenditure of general government at current prices” and “Price deflator total final consumption expenditure of general government”; on 20 October 2015 for “Gross fixed capital formation at current prices: general government” and “Price deflator gross fixed capital formation: total economy”).
  4. Auerbach, Alan J, and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. 2012a. “Fiscal Multipliers in Recession and Expansion.” In Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis, ed. Alberto Alesina, and Francesco Giavazzi, 63–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Auerbach, Alan J., and Yuriy Gorodnichenko. 2012b. “Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(2): 1–27.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, Marianne, and Robert G. King. 1993. “Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium.” American Economic Review 83(3): 315–34.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchard, Olivier J., and Roberto Perotti. 2002. “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1329–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caggiano, Giovanni, Efrem Castelnuovo, Valentina Colombo, and Gabriela Nodari. 2015. “Estimating Fiscal Multipliers: News From A Non-linear World.” The Economic Journal 125(584): 746–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiano, Lawrence, Martin Eichenbaum, and Sergio Rebelo. 2011. “When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large?” Journal of Political Economy 119(1): 78–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corsetti, Giancarlo, André Meier, and Gernot J. Müller. 2012. “Fiscal Stimulus with Spending Reversals.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94(4): 878–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Cos, Pablo Hernández, and Enrique Moral-Benito. 2016. “On the Predictability of Narrative Fiscal Adjustments.” Economics Letters 143: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devries, Pete, Andrea Pescatori, Daniel Leigh, and Jaime Guajardo. 2011. “A New Action-Based Dataset of Fiscal Consolidation.” IMF Working Paper 11/128, International Monetary Fund June 2011.Google Scholar
  13. Eggertsson, Gauti B. 2011. “What Fiscal Policy is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2010, vol. 25, ed. Daron Acemoglu, and Michael Woodford, 59–112. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Erceg, Christopher J, and Jesper Lindé. 2013. “Fiscal Consolidation in a Currency Union: Spending Cuts Vs. Tax Hikes.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(2): 422–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guajardo, Jaime, Daniel Leigh, and Andrea Pescatori. 2014. “Expansionary Austerity? International Evidence.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12(4): 949–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2015. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/index.aspx (Accessed on 22 September 2015).
  17. Jordà, Òscar. 2005. “Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections.” The American Economic Review 95(1): 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jordà, Òscar, and Alan M Taylor. 2016. “The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy.” The Economic Journal 126(590): 219–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koop, Gary, M.Hashem Pesaran, and Simon M. Potter. 1996. “Impulse Response Analysis in Nonlinear Multivariate Models.” Journal of Econometrics 74(1): 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leeper, Eric M., Todd B. Walker, and Shu-Chun Susan Yang. 2008. “Fiscal Foresight: Analytics and Econometrics.” NBER Working Papers 14028, National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Lemoine, Matthieu and Jesper Lindé. 2016. “Fiscal Consolidation Under Imperfect Credibility.” Working Paper Series 322, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden) May 2016.Google Scholar
  22. Mertens, Karel, and Morten O. Ravn. 2014. “Fiscal Policy in an Expectations-Driven Liquidity Trap.” Review of Economic Studies 81(4): 1637–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miyamoto, Wataru, Thuy Lan Nguyen, and Dmitriy Sergeyev. 2016. “Government Spending Multipliers Under the Zero Lower Bound: Evidence from Japan.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP11633, Centre for Economic Policy Research November 2016.Google Scholar
  24. Nakamura, Emi, and Jón Steinsson. 2014. “Fiscal Stimulus in a Monetary Union: Evidence from US Regions.” American Economic Review 104(3): 753–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD, OECD Economic Outlook No. 88 (Edition 2010/2). OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (Database), 2010. 10.1787/data-00533-en (Accessed on 18 July 2016).Google Scholar
  26. OECD, “Historical Population Data and Projections (1950–2050),” OECD Statistics (Database), 2015. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=POP_PROJ (Accessed on 21 October 2015; for FIN and SWE on 22 February 2016).
  27. OECD, “OECD Economic Outlook No. 97 (Edition 2015/1),” OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (Database), 2015. 10.1787/data-00759-en (Accessed on 15 September 2015 for “Gross domestic product, volume, market prices” and “Gross domestic product, value, market prices”; on 15 July 2016 for “Govt. final consumption expenditure, volume”; on 24 September 2015 for “Govt. gross fixed capital formation, volume”).Google Scholar
  28. OECD, “OECD Economic Outlook No. 98 (Edition 2015/2),” OECD Economic Outlook: Statistics and Projections (Database), 2015. 10.1787/bd810434-en (Accessed on 25 March 2016).Google Scholar
  29. Owyang, Michael T., Valerie A. Ramey, and Sarah Zubairy. 2013. “Are Government Spending Multipliers Greater During Periods of Slack? Evidence from Twentieth-Century Historical Data.” The American Economic Review 103(3): 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramey, Valerie A. 2011. “Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It’s all in the Timing.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(1): 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramey, Valerie A., and Sarah Zubairy. 2015. “Are Government Spending Multipliers State Dependent? Evidence from U.S. and Canadian Historical Data.” Working Paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  32. Ramey, Valerie A., and Sarah Zubairy. 2017. “Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from U.S. Historical Data,” Journal of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  33. Romer, Christina D., and David H. Romer. 2010. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks.” American Economic Review 100(3): 763–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toda, Hiro Y., and Taku Yamamoto. 1995. “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes.” Journal of Econometrics 66(1): 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodford, Michael. 2011. “Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3(1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Monetary Fund 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Alesina
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Gualtiero Azzalini
    • 5
  • Carlo Favero
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Francesco Giavazzi
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Armando Miano
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.IGIER BocconiMilanItaly
  3. 3.CEPRLondonUK
  4. 4.NBERCambridgeUSA
  5. 5.Bocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations