Higher Education Policy

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 451–472 | Cite as

The Paradox of Autonomy: Japan’s Vernacular Scholarship and the Policy Pursuit of “Super Global”

Original Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Japan’s humanities and social science scholarship has retained its commitment to the national language and local readership over the past two decades despite a policy-driven shift away from the old norm of distinctive independence once termed “opting out” of the game. Analysis of academic publications in two disciplines in a public research university from the 1990s to the early 2010s indicates little change in language or medium: an overwhelming majority are written in Japanese and published in national periodicals and books. The article unveils the paradox of autonomy in Japan’s academia by examining the continued commitment to locally relevant research at the expense of global recognition vis-à-vis the government’s declaration to make some of the nation’s top universities “super global.” Amidst the global fad to join the ranks of the world’s top-ranked universities, the Japanese government’s quest is likely to bring mixed consequences for domestic higher education institutions. In particular, the study points out an increasing risk of compartmentalization and erosion of vernacular research that demands a serious policy reappraisal.

Keywords

world university rankings world class universities academic publishing vernacular scholarship humanities and social sciences research assessment Japan 

References

  1. Altbach, P.G. and Balán J. (eds.) (2007) World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asian and Latin America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alatas, S.F. (2003) ‘Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences’, Current Sociology 51(6): 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amano, I. (2009) Daigaku no tanjō (jō): Teikokudaigaku no jidai (in Japanese) [The Birth of Universities: The Age of Imperial Universities], Tokyo: Chūōkōron Shinsha.Google Scholar
  4. Amano, I. (2014) ‘Globalization and Higher Education Reforms in Japan: The Obstacles to Greater International Competitiveness’, http://www.nippon.com/en/in-depth/a02801/, accessed 2 August 2016.
  5. Anninos, L.N. (2013) ‘Research performance evaluation: some critical thoughts on standard bibliometric indicators’, Studies in Higher Education 39(9): 1–20.Google Scholar
  6. Chou, C.P. (2014) ‘Why the SSCI Syndrome is a Global Phenomenon?’, in The SSCI Syndrome in Higher Education, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. vii–xv.Google Scholar
  7. Dolan, C. (2007) ‘Feasibility study: The evaluation and benchmarking of humanities research in Europe’, Humanities in the European Research Area, http://www.aqu.cat/doc/doc_34869796_1.pdf, accessed 2 August 2016.
  8. Funamori, M. (2012) ‘Nihon oyobi sekai no rombun tōkō jyōkyō no bunseki (in Japanese) [The Status of Publication and Citation of Academic Articles in Japan and the World]’, a presentation at kenkyu kaihatsu hyoka shimpojium [symposium on research development and evaluation], http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/science/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/05/24/1321315_01.pdf, accessed 2 August 2016.
  9. Guo, W. and Ngok, K. (2008) ‘The quest for world class universities in China: critical reflections’, Policy Futures in Education 6(5): 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanafi, S. (2011) ‘University systems in the Arab East: publish globally and perish locally vs publish locally and perish globally’, Current Sociology 59(3): 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayashi, T. and Tsuchiya, S. (2016) ‘Gakumon bunya ni yoru takuetsusei shihyō no tayōsei: tayōna kenkyū seika e no hōshō no hitsuyō (in Japanese) [Diversity in Excellence Indicators by Discipline and the Need for Differentiated Reward System]’, in M. Ishikawa (ed.) The World University Rankings and Hegemonic Restructuring of Knowledge (in Japanese), Kyoto: Kyoto University Press, pp. 325–345.Google Scholar
  12. Hazelkorn, E. (2013) ‘How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Education’, in V. Climent, F. Michavila, and M. Ripolles (eds.) Los Rankings Univeritarios, Mitos y Realidades, Madrid: Tecnos, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  13. Hazelkorn, E. (2008) ‘Learning to live with league tables and ranking: the experience of institutional leaders’, Higher Education Policy 21(2): 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, A.H.M. (2009) ‘Science as ideology: SSCI, TSSCI and the evaluation system of social sciences in Taiwan’, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 10(2): 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huisman, J. (2008) ‘World-class universities’, Higher Education Policy 21(1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishikawa, M. (2009) ‘University rankings, global models, and emerging hegemony critical analysis from Japan’, Journal of Studies in International Education 13(2): 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishikawa, M. (2011) ‘Redefining Internationalization in Higher Education: Global 30 and the Making of Global Universities in Japan’, in D.B. Willis and J. Rappleye (eds.) Reimagining Japanese Education: Borders, Transfers, Circulations, and the Comparative, Oxford, UK: Symposium Books, pp. 193–223.Google Scholar
  18. Ishikawa, M. (2014) ‘Ranking regime and the future of vernacular scholarship’, Education Policy Analysis Archives 22(30): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n30.2014, accessed 2 August 2016.
  19. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (2011) ‘Jinbungaku shakaikagaku no kokusaika ni tsuite (in Japanese) [Internationalization of humanities and social sciences]’, https://www.jsps.go.jp/j-kenkyukai/data/02houkokusho/houkokusho.pdf, accessed 2 August 2016.
  20. Jöns, H., and Hoyler, M. (2013) ‘Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings’, Geoforum 46, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang, M. (2009) ‘State‐guided’university reform and colonial conditions of knowledge production’, Inter‐Asia Cultural Studies 10(2): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kariya, T. (2015) ‘Sūpā gurōbaru daigaku no yukue: gaikokujin kyōintō no kōzai (in Japanese), [Japan’s Plan for “Super Global Universities”: The limits of Japanese-style globalization]’, Asteion 82: 38–52.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, K.S. and Nam, S. (2007) ‘The Making of a World-Class University in the Periphery: Seoul National University’, in P.G. Altbach and J. Balán (eds.) World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 122–142.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, H., and Lee, K. (2013) ‘Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: neoliberal ideology in a Korean university’, Language Policy 12(3): 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, Y., and Flowerdew, J. (2009) ‘International engagement versus local commitment: Hong Kong academics in the humanities and social sciences writing for publication’, Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(4): 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lie, J. (1996) ‘Sociology of contemporary Japan’, Current Sociology 44(1): 1–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lo, W.Y.W. (2013) ‘University rankings as a zoning technology: A Taiwanese perspective on an imaginary Greater China higher education region’, Globalisation, Societies and Education 11(4): 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mathews, G. (2015) ‘East Asian anthropology in the world’, American Anthropologist 117(2): 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (MEXT) (2012) ‘Infrastructure development for strengthening the capacity of international scholarly communication’, from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu4/toushin/1323857.htm, accessed 2 August 2016.
  30. Mohrman, K. (2008) ‘The emerging global model with Chinese characteristics’, Higher Education Policy 21: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mok, K.H. (2012) ‘Global Aspirations and Strategizing for World-Class Status: New Modes of Higher-Education Governance and the Emergence of Regulatory Regionalism in East Asia’, in A.R. Nelson and I.P. Wei (eds.) The Global University, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ninomiya, A., Knight, J. and Watanabe, A. (2009) ‘The past, present, and future of Internationalization in Japan’, Journal of Studies in International Education 13(2): 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oleksiyenko, A. (2014) ‘On the shoulders of giants? Global Science, Resource Asymmetries, and Repositioning of Research Universities in China and Russia’, Comparative Education Review 58(3): 482–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paasi, A. (2005) ‘Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces’, Environment and Planning A 37(5): 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Post, D. (2012) ‘Rank scholarship’, Comparative Education Review 56(1): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/663834, accessed 2 August 2016.
  36. Sawa, T. (2015) ‘Humanities under attack’, The Japan Times, 23 August.Google Scholar
  37. Scott, J.C. (2012) Two Cheers for Anarchism: Six Easy Pieces on Autonomy, Dignity, and Meaningful Work and Play, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Shin, J.C. (2009) ‘Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project’, Higher Education 58(5): 669–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shin, J.C., and Cummings, W.K. (2010) ‘Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: research preference, collaboration, and time on research’, Scientometrics 85(2): 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shore, C., and Wright, S. (1999) ‘Audit culture and anthropology: neo-liberalism in British higher education’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5(4): 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sidhu, R. (2005) ‘Building a global schoolhouse: International education in Singapore’, Australian Journal of Education 49(1): 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Slaughter, S., and Cantwell, B. (2012) ‘Transatlantic moves to the market: the United States and the European Union’, Higher Education 63(5): 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Song, M.-M. and Tai, H.-H. (2007) ‘Taiwan’s responses to globalisation: Internationalisation and questing for world class universities’, Asia Pacific Journal of Education 27(3): 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stack, M. (2016) Global University Rankings and the Mediatization of Higher Education, London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Strathern, M. (2000) Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Raan, A.F.J. (2005) ‘Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods’, Scientometrics 62(1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wright, S. (2012) ‘Ranking Universities Within a Globalised World of Competition States: to What Purpose, and with What Implications for Students?’, in H.L.A.J.C. Jacobsen (ed.) Uddannelseskvalitet i det 21. Århundrede, Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur, pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
  48. Yonezawa, A. (2012) ‘Japan’s University Education in Social Sciences and Humanities Under Globalization’, in A. Lopez-Varela (ed.) Social Sciences and Cultural Studies: Issues of Language, Public Opinion, Education and Welfare, InTech, published 19 September doi:10.5772/38850, http://www.intechopen.com/books/social-sciences-and-cultural-studies-issues-of-language-public-opinion-education-and-welfare/education-and-research-of-social-science-and-humanities-in-japan-under-globalization, accessed 2 August 2016.

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Global InitiativesOsaka UniversitySuita, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Foreign Language DepartmentDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations