The Higher Education landscape is constantly evolving. Larger and more diverse student cohorts, the growing demands for flexibility and accessibility, but not at the expense of quality, have been driving universities to reimagine learning spaces by using the affordances of digital technologies. While there is an abundance of literature on individual experimentation with blended learning formats at course level, there are far fewer accounts of institutional implementation. This article analyses four cases of institutionalised blended learning implementation at European universities, with a disciplinary focus on political science and international relations. By exploring the strategies, structures and support (Graham et al. in Internet High Educ 18:4–14, 2013), we aim to understand at what stage in the institutionalisation process each case can be situated. Based on our research, we identify five critical factors for a mature blended learning institutional implementation: an integrative approach, a gradual development model, a rigorous evaluation process, strong relations with the university and openness towards cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Barley, S.R., and P.S. Tolbert. 1997. Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies 18(1): 93–117.
Bell, M., and W. Bell. 2005. It’s installed … Now get on with it! Looking beyond the software to the cultural change. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(4): 643–656.
Bohle Carbonell, K., A. Dailey-Hebert, and W. Gijselaers. 2013. Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 29–37.
Buckley, F. 2011. Online discussion forums. European Political Science 10(3): 402–415.
Cardona Román, D. and J. Sánchez-Torres. 2016. A literature review of the institutional characteristics required for implementing e-learning in Higher Education. In Proceedings of EDULEAN16 Conference, Barcelona, 2219–2231.
Casanovas, I. 2010. Exploring the current theoretical background about adoption until institutionalization of online education in universities: Needs for further research. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 8(2): 73–84.
Cheawjindakarn, B., P. Suwannatthachote, and A. Theeraroungchaisri. 2013. Critical success factors for online distance learning in higher education: A review of the literature. Creative Education 3(8): 61–66.
Curaj, A., L. Deca, and R. Pricopie. 2018. European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer.
Dziuban, C., and P. Moskal. 2011. A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. Internet and Higher Education 14(4): 236–241.
European University Association. 2014. E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions. Available at https://eua.eu/resources/publications/368:e-learning-in-european-higher-education-institutions.html. Accessed 12 December 2019.
European University Association. 2018. Trends 2018. Learning and teaching in the European higher education area. https://eua.eu/resources/publications/757:trends-2018-learning-and-teaching-in-the-european-higher-education-area.html. Accessed 12 December 2019.
Galvis, A.H. 2018. Supporting decision-making processes on blended learning in higher education: Literature and good practices review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15(1): 25.
Garrison, D.R., and N.D. Vaughan. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Wiley.
Garrison, D.R., and N.D. Vaughan. 2013. Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 24–28.
Graham, C.R., S. Allen, and D. Ure. 2005. Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology, vol. 5. 1st ed. ed. D.B.A. Khosrow-Pour, 253–259. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Graham, C.R., W. Woodfield, and J.B. Harrison. 2013. A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 4–14.
Hsieh, H.-F., and S. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277–1288.
Kanwar, A., R. Mohee, A. Carr, K. Ortlieb, and K. Sukon. 2019. A neo-institutionalist approach to understanding drivers of quality assurance in ODL. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 20(4): 79–98.
Ma, Z., C.-C. Lin, and R.C.-P. Lin. 2011. Re-examining the critical success factors of e-learning from the EU perspective. International Journal of Management in Education 5(1): 44–62.
MacKeogh, K., and S. Fox. 2009. Strategies for embedding e-learning in traditional universities: Drivers and barriers. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 7(2): 147–154.
Marshall, S. 2010. Change, technology and higher education: Are universities capable of organisational change?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1018.
Mayhew, E. 2017. Playback feedback: The impact of screen-captured video feedback on student satisfaction, learning and attainment. European Political Science 16(2): 179–192.
McPherson, M., and M. Nunes. 2006. Organisational issues for e-learning: Critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners. International Journal of Educational Management 20(7): 542–558.
Moskal, P., C. Dziuban, and J. Hartman. 2013. Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education 18: 15–23.
Niemiec, M., and G. Otte. 2010. An Administrator’s guide to the whys and hows of blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 14(1): 91–102.
O’Dowd, R. 2013. Telecollaborative networks in university higher education: Overcoming barriers to integration. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 47–53.
Ossiannilsson, E., and L. Landgren. 2012. Quality in e-learning—A conceptual framework based on experiences from three international benchmarking projects. Journal of Computer Assisted learning 28(1): 42–51.
Paquette, L., M. Randall-Schab, and J. Busacca. 2015. Teaching political science to undergraduates: Active pedagogy for the microchip mind. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Porter, W., C. Graham, R. Bodily, and D. Sandberg. 2016. A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 28(1): 17–27.
Porter, W., C. Graham, K. Spring, and K. Welch. 2014. Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education 75: 185–195.
Ralph, J., N. Head, and S. Lightfoot. 2010. Pol-casting: The use of podcasting in the teaching and learning of politics and international relations. European Political Science 9: 13–24.
Rofe, J.S. 2015. Distance and online course design. In Handbook on teaching and learning in political science and international relations, ed. J. Ishiyama, W. Miller, and E. Simon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
Singh, G., and G. Hardaker. 2017. Change levers for unifying top-down and bottom-up approaches to the adoption and diffusion of e-learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 22(6): 736–748.
Smith, K. 2012. Lessons learnt from literature on the diffusion of innovative learning and teaching practices in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49(2): 173–182.
Taylor, J., and D. Newton. 2013. Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet and Higher Education 18: 54–60.
Thompson, L. 2019. Using audience response systems to amplify student learning in political science: A case study of electoral systems teaching. European Political Science 18: 351–362.
Tolbert, P. and L. Zucker. 1996. The institutionalization of institutional theory. In Handbook of organization studies, eds. S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. Nord, 175–190. https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/423.
Woodcock, P., and G. Duckworth. 2010. iPod therefore I am: Using PC videos to aid the teaching of the history of political philosophy. European Political Science 9(1): 25–33.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zhu, C. 2015. Organisational culture and technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24(1): 65–79.
Zhu, C., and N. Engels. 2014. Organizational culture and instructional innovations in higher education: Perceptions and reactions of teachers and students. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 42(1): 136–158.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Mihai, A., Questier, F. & Zhu, C. The institutionalisation of online and blended learning initiatives in politics and international relations at European universities. Eur Polit Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00307-5
- Blended learning
- Online learning