Prudence and Different Kinds of Prevention
- 38 Downloads
This paper examines the effect of prudence on the optimal choices of advance and contemporaneous prevention in a context where the two kinds of prevention are used together. We show that, under some conditions on the probability of loss occurrence, prudence tends to increase advance prevention and to reduce contemporaneous prevention, while imprudence tends to do the opposite. Further results on the effect of prudence/imprudence on agents’ optimal behavior are provided.
Keywordsprevention prudence self protection advance prevention contemporaneous prevention
The author would like to thank Louis Eeckhoudt, Richard Peter, two anonymous referees and the Associate Editor Diego Nocetti for their useful comments and suggestions. The usual disclaimers apply.
- Chiu, W. Henry. 2005. Degree of Downside Risk Aversion and Self-protection. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 36: 93–101.Google Scholar
- Chuang, O-Chia C., Louis Eeckhoudt, Rachel J. Huang, and Larry Y. Tzeng. 2013. Risky Targets and Effort. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52: 465–468Google Scholar
- Courbage, Christophe, Henri Loubergé, and Richard Peter. 2015. Optimal Prevention for Multiple Risks. Journal of Risk and Insurance.Google Scholar
- Courbage, Christophe, Béatrice Rey, and Nicolas Treich. 2013. Prevention and Precaution, in Handbook of Insurance, edited by George Dionne. New York: Springer, 185–204.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, Annette, and Richard Peter. 2011. Safe Today or Sorry Tomorrow? The Impact of Time-Structure on Optimal Prevention. Munich Risk and Insurance Center, Working Paper 4.Google Scholar
- Huang Yi-Chieh, Larry Y. Tzeng, and Lin Zhao. 2015. Comparative Ambiguity Aversion and Downside Ambiguity Aversion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 62: 257–269.Google Scholar
- Huang, Rachel J. 2012. Ambiguity Aversion, Higher-Order Risk Attitude and Optimal Effort. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50: 338–345.Google Scholar
- Menegatti, Mario. 2012. New Results on Optimal Prevention of Risk Averse Agents. Economics Bulletin, 32: 2166–2173.Google Scholar
- Wang, Hongxia, Jiangli J. Wang, Jingyuan Li, and Xinping Xia. 2015. Precautionary paying for stochastic improvements under background risks. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 64: 180–185.Google Scholar