French Colonial Trade Patterns and European Settlements

Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

We construct a new database relying on various primary historical sources containing information on the value of French sectoral trade between 1880 and 1913 in order to assess the contemporaneous effects of colonial European settlements on French trade patterns. Our empirical results show that French colonies with more European settlements traded more with France. The impact is stronger with respect to the imports of raw materials and exports of manufactured goods from France to their colonies, suggesting that those territories were a source of resources for France and a market for its products. European settlements in colonies other than the French ones did not impact the trade of those colonies with France. We also explore to what extent the impact of European settlements on trade was exerted through the channel of the institutions brought by the settlers. Separating the part of European settlements associated with institutions, we find that the settlements associated with stronger institutions in French colonies had a positive impact on trade with those colonies. No significant impact was found for non-French colonies.

Keywords

International trade Colonization Institutions 

JEL Classification

F14 N53 N74 O5 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor, Josef Brada, and three anonymous referees for very helpful comments that helped improving the paper. We thank Pamina Koenig, Marcelo Olarreaga, Rodrigo Paillacar, Estefania Santacreu-Vasut, and Jose de Sousa for their useful comments and suggestions. We also thank participants at the 10th Eurasia Business and Economics Society conference, the 13th European Historical Economics Society conference, the 39th Annual Economic and Business History Society Conference, the 29th European Economic Association Conference, the 4th Asian Historical Economics Conference, as well as seminar participants at DIAL and THEMA. The usual disclaimer applies. This research has been conducted as part of the project Labex MME-DII (ANR11-LBX-0023-01).

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., F.A. Gallego, and J.A. Robinson. 2014. Institutions, human capital and development. NBER working papers 19933, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson. 2001. The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson. 2002. Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. Robinson. 2005. The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth. American Economic Review 95 (3): 546–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alam, M.S. 1994. Colonialism, decolonisation and growth rates: Theory and empirical evidence. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (3): 235–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amin, S. 1972. Underdevelopment and dependence in black Africa: Historical origin. Journal of Peace Research 9 (2): 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baier, S.L., and J.H. Bergstrand. 2009. Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics 77 (1): 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bairoch, P. 1999. Mythes et paradoxes de l’histoire conomique. Paris: Edition de la decouverte.Google Scholar
  9. Barro, R.J. 1999. Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy 107 (S6): S158–S183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becuwe, S., B. Blancheton, K. Onfroy, et al. 2015. French international trade, dataset 1836–1938 montesquieu database. Technical report, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée.Google Scholar
  11. Betts, R.F. 1961. Assimilation and association in French colonial theory, 1890–1914. Number 604 in Columbia studies in the social sciences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Briant, A., P.-P. Combes, and M. Lafourcade. 2009. Product complexity, quality of institutions and the pro-trade effect of immigrants. PSE Working Papers halshs-00566772, HAL.Google Scholar
  13. Cain, P.J., and A.G. Hopkins. 1993. British imperialism: Innovation and expansion 1688–1914. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, W.B. 1971. Rulers of empire: The French colonial service in Africa. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crosby, A. 1986. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe 900–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Crowder, M. 1968. West Africa under colonial rule. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dedinger, B., and P. Girard. 2017. Exploring trade globalization in the long run: The ricardo project. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 50 (1): 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Egger, P.H., M. Von Ehrlich, and D.R. Nelson. 2012. Migration and trade. The World Economy 35 (2): 216–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engerman, S.L. and K.L. Sokoloff. 1997. Factor endowments: Institutions, and differential paths of growth among new world economies: A view from economic historians of the united states. NBER historical working papers 0066, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Estevadeordal, A., B. Frantz, and A.M. Taylor. 2002. The rise and fall of world trade, 1870–1939. NBER working papers 9318, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Fenske, J. 2014. Ecology, trade, and states in pre-colonial Africa. Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (3): 612–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferguson, N., and M. Schularick. 2006. The empire effect: The determinants of country risk in the first age of globalization, 1880–1913. The Journal of Economic History 66 (02): 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feyrer, J., and B. Sacerdote. 2009. Colonialism and modern income: Islands as natural experiments. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frieden, J.A. 2006. Global capitalism: Its fall and rise in the twentieth century. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  25. Girden, E .R. 2001. Evaluating research articles from start to finish. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Glick, R., et al. 2017. Currency unions and regional trade agreements: EMU and EU effects on trade. Comparative Economic Studies 59(2): 194–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groot, H.D., G.-J. Linders, P. Rietveld, and U. Subramanian. 2004. The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57 (1): 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Head, K., T. Mayer, and J. Ries. 2010. The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence. Journal of International Economics 81 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hopkins, A.G. 2014. An economic history of West Africa. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Huillery, E. 2011. The impact of European settlement within French West Africa: Did pre-colonial prosperous areas fall behind? Journal of African Economies 20 (2): 263–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaggers, K., and T.R. Gurr. 1995. Polity III: Regime change and political authority, 1800–1994. 2nd ICPSR version. Boulder, CO/College Park, MD: Keith Jaggers/Ted Robert Gurr.Google Scholar
  32. Kaiser, H.F. 1960. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleiman, E. 1976. Trade and the decline of colonialism. The Economic Journal 86 (343): 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kwon, R. 2011. How the legacy of French colonization has shaped divergent levels of economic development in East Asia: A time-series cross-national analysis. The Sociological Quarterly 52: 56–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1999. The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (1): 222–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lal, D. 2004. Praise of empires: Globalization and order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Landes, D.S. 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  38. Lavallée, E., and J. Lochard. 2015. The comparative effects of independence on trade. Journal of Comparative Economics 43 (3): 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Linders, G.-J. 2004. The effect of domestic institutions on international trade flows: A sectoral analysis. ERSA conference papers ersa04p357, European Regional Science Association.Google Scholar
  40. Maddison, A. 2006. The world economy. Paris: Development Center of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manning, P. 1982. Slavery, colonialism, and economic growth in Dahomey, 1640–1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marseille, J. 1984. Empire Colonial et Capitalisme Francais. Histoire D’un divorce. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, P., T. Mayer, and M. Thoenig. 2008. Make trade not war? The Review of Economic Studies 75 (3): 865–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, T., and S. Zignago. 2011. Notes on cepii distances measures: The geodist database. Technical report, CEPII.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, B. 2007a. International historical statistics: Africa, Asia and Oceania, 1750–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Mitchell, B. 2007b. International historical statistics: The Americas, 1750–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Mitchener, K.J., and M. Weidenmier. 2008. Trade and empire. The Economic Journal 118: 1805–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. North, D., W. Summerhill, and B. Weingast. 1998. Order disorder and economic change Latin America vs North America. Stanford: Hoover Institution Publications, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  49. Nunn, N. 2008. The long-term effects of Africa’s slave trades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 139–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nunn, N., and D. Trefler. 2013. Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage. NBER working papers 18851, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Parker, P.M. 1997. National cultures of the world: A statistical reference, vol. 4. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  52. Rauch, J.E. 1999. Networks versus markets in international trade. Journal of International Economics 48 (1): 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rose, A. 1999. One money, one market: Estimating the effect of common currencies on trade. Seminar papers 678, Stockholm University, Institute for International Economic Studies.Google Scholar
  54. Ross, M. 1999. The political economy of the resource curse. World Politics 51 (2): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sandberg, H.M., and James L. Seale. 2012. The impact of historical and regional networks on trade volumes within the western hemisphere: A gravity analysis across sectors. 2012 annual meeting, February 4–7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 120071, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.Google Scholar
  56. Sousa, J.D., and J. Lochard. 2012. Trade and colonial status. Journal of African Economies 21 (3): 409–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tadei, F. 2017. Measuring extractive institutions: Colonial trade and price gaps in French Africa. Working papers 0109, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).Google Scholar
  58. Walmsley, T., S.A. Ahmed, and C. Parsons. 2005. The impact of liberalizing labor mobility in the pacific region. GTAP working papers 1874, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Comparative Economic Studies 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lebanese American UniversityBeirutLebanon
  2. 2.ESSEC Business SchoolCergy-PontoiseFrance
  3. 3.THEMACergy-PontoiseFrance

Personalised recommendations