Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 668–674 | Cite as

“Could we meet?”: A conversation on collaboration, feeling and failure

Andrew S. Balmer, Katie Bulpin, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson (Eds), Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, US$87.75, ISBN: 978-1137495419.
  • Andrew S. Balmer
  • Susan Molyneux-Hodgson
  • Felicity Callard
  • Des Fitzgerald
Books Forum

Fitzgerald: Andy and Susie, Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices, the book you co-wrote with Kate Bulpin, is an ethnographic account of the emergence of synthetic biology in the UK, a new and much-hyped interdisciplinary field crossing engineering and biology, and in which you have been entangled for some years. Of course there is more than one kind of ‘changing practice’ in question here: in addition to new engineering and microbiological endeavours, a new kind of sociological or STS practice is at stake too, one that seems to be suspended awkwardly between ethnographic observation of, and collaborative participation in, a new science. Can you reflect on the emergence of this practice, as both a methodological and a literary tactic?

Balmer:Multiple kinds of practices were indeed at stake in the work. Susie had helped to devise the project and had ensured that the sociology component of the grant application was equally weighted, but how we were going to collaborate...

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2007) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, M.G., Myers, G. and Potter, J. (1995) Discourse, rhetoric and reflexivity: seven days in the library. In: S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Peterson and T. Pinch (eds.) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: Sage, pp. 321–342.Google Scholar
  3. Berlant, L. (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callard, F. and Fitzgerald, D. (2015) Rethinking Interdisciplinarity across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe. Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Halberstam, J. (2011) The Queer Art of Failure. Durhamm NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Low end theory. (2017, July 25) Retrieved from https://twitter.com/touchfaith/status/889661194906324992.
  8. Lyle, K. (2017) Shaping the future of sociology: The challenge of interdisciplinarity beyond the social sciences. Sociology 51(6): 1169–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Molyneux-Hodgson, S. and Balmer. A.S. (2014) Synthetic biology, water industry and the performance of an innovation barrier. Science and Public Policy 41(4): 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ngai, S. (2005) Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IK: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Viseu, A. (2015) Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist. Social Studies of Science 45(5): 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Woolgar, S. (ed.) (1988) Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. Balmer
    • 1
  • Susan Molyneux-Hodgson
    • 2
  • Felicity Callard
    • 3
  • Des Fitzgerald
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Sociology, School of Social SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  3. 3.Department of Psychosocial StudiesBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.School of Social SciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations