Skip to main content
Log in

The different influences of the government and politicians on the international expansion of Chinese firms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Asian Business & Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the influences from the political sector on international expansion of Chinese firms. In analyzing the political sector, we distinguish between ‘formal institutional influences from the government’ and ‘informal relational influences from elite politicians.’ We argue that the government can pressure emerging-market firms to expand abroad despite the risk when outbound globalization is the national policy. However, networks with powerful politicians can discourage international expansion since sufficient domestic returns provided by the political connections can lead to lower motivation for internationalization. The governmental pressures toward internationalization can be moderated by firm size and relational networks with powerful politicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The value has increased above 0 after the year 2014, but still remains at a very low level.

  2. The results from running the negative binomial regressions are essentially the same. The main effect of the geopolitical network lost significance in the fully specified model where all the interaction terms were entered, probably because of the correlation between the geopolitical variable and the interaction term between the geopolitical and the state control variable. However, the geopolitical network was negative and significant in all other models, providing some support for Hypothesis 4. All other hypotheses were equally supported in negative binomial models as in Poisson models.

References

  • Akita, T., & Lukman, R. A. (1995). Interregional inequalities in Indonesia: a sectoral decomposition analysis for 1975–92. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 31(2), 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. (2010). Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 437–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Corporate social capital in Chinese guanxi culture. In D. J. Brass, G. Labianca, A. Mehra, D. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 40, pp. 421–443). Bingley: Emerald Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J. (1988). Political aspects of MNE theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 341–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddewyn, J. J., & Brewer, T. (1994). International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions. Academy of Management Review, 19, 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, M. Y., & Peterson, M. F. (2009). Merging without alienating: Interventions promoting cross-cultural organizational integration and their limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 468–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. (2010). The end of the free market: Who wins the war between states and corporations?. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Homes & Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, L., & Guillen, M. (2009). National corporate governance institutions and post-acquisition target reorganization. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 803–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2005). Corporatisation of China’s state-owned enterprises and corporate governance. In D. H. M. Brown & I. Alasdair (Eds.), Challenges for China’s development: An enterprise perspective (pp. 58–71). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Dickson, B. J. (2010). Allies of the state: China’s private entrepreneurs and democratic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 381–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingano, F., & Pinotti, P. (2013). Politicians at work: The private returns and social costs of political connections. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(2), 433–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2012). State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3), 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, R., & Xu, L. C. (2005). Institutions, ownership, and finance: The determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 117–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (2005). Who governs?: Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, P. (2009). Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion? Journal of World Business, 44(1), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1986). Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational cost explanation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 4, 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets: An economic sociology of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Canal, E., & Guillen, M. F. (2008). Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1097–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M. F., & García-Canal, E. (2009). The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (2004). Institutions and growth in East Asia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattari, R., & Rajan, R. S. (2011). How different are FDI and FPI flows?: Distance and capital market integration. Journal of Economic Integration, 26(3), 499–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., Jia, N., Shi, J., & Wang, Y. (2017). The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 67–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(1), 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., & Delios, A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. (1999). Comparative economic organization-within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1(3), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Wang, C., & Kafouros, M. (2015). The role of the state in explaining the internationalization of emerging market enterprises. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Xie, E., Li, Y., & Reddy, K. S. (2017). Does state ownership facilitate outward FDI of Chinese SOEs? Institutional development, market competition, and the logic of interdependence between governments and SOEs. International Business Review, 26(1), 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2009). Balance of payments and international investment position manual (6th ed.). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y., Shin, D., & Jeong, Y. C. (2016). Inside the “Hybrid” iron cage: Political origins of hybridization. Organization Science, 27(2), 428–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. P. (1969). American business abroad. Thunderbird International Business Review, 11(2), 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D. (1994). Political networks: the structural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, U., & Kreuter, F. (2005). Data analysis using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2013). A long march for China’s national champions. The Australian Business Review. Retrieved from https://www.theaustralian.com.au/

  • Lenway, S. A., & Murtha, T. P. (1994). The state as strategist in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 513–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 791–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Liu, X., Wright, M., & Filatotchev, I. (2014). International experience and FDI location choices of Chinese firms: The moderating effects of home country government support and host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(4), 428–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). Outbound globalization of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. (2010). How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. A. (2002). Dragon multinational: A new model for global growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matveeva, A. (1999). Democratization, legitimacy and political change in Central Asia. International Affairs, 75(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. E., Ding, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2014). Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 1005–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (2000). The power elite (Vol. 20). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M. S., & Schwartz, M. (1987). The structural analysis of business: An Emerging field. In Mark Mizruchi & Michael Schwartz (Eds.), Intercorporate relations (pp. 3–21). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zhao, M. (2008). Perspectives on China’s outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 337–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition: Hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V., & Opper, S. (2010). Political capital in a market economy. Social Forces, 88, 2105–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Benchmark definition of foreign direct investment (4th ed.). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksenberg, M. (2001). China’s political system: Challenges of the twenty-first century. The China Journal, 45, 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Teng, L., Supapol, A. B., Lu, X., Huang, D., & Wang, Z. (2014). Firms’ FDI ownership: The influence of government ownership and legislative connections. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 1029–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. C. (1990). Development lessons from Asia: The role of government in South Korea and Taiwan. The American Economic Review, 80(2), 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. The Journal of Law and Economics, 19(2), 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2012). The global strategy of emerging multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. G., & Welch, S. (1978). Political corruption in America: A search for definitions and a theory, or if political corruption is in the mainstream of American politics why is it not in the mainstream of American politics research? American Political Science Review, 72(3), 974–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1977). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 379–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The economy as instituted process. In K. Polanyi, C. M. Arensberg, & H. W. Pearson (Eds.), Trade and market in the early empires: Economies in history and theory (pp. 243–270). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeb, D. M., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Baek, H. Y. (1998). Systematic risk of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2), 263–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, S. J., & Sastré-Gutiérrez, M. L. (2010). Interregional inequality dynamics in Mexico. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(3), 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S., Lenway, S. A., & Govekar, M. (1990). Management of the political imperative in international business. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, C., Zhao, R., & Li, S. (2001). China’s retreat from equality: Income distribution and economic transition. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., & Eden, L. (2005). Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rui, H., & Yip, G. S. (2008). Foreign acquisitions by Chinese firms: A strategic intent perspective. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeon, R., & Elkins, D. J. (1974). Regional political cultures in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 7(3), 397–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiller, P. T. (1990). Politicians, interest groups, and regulators: A multiple-principals agency theory of regulation, or “Let them be bribed”. The Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 65–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1249–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2002). Globalization strategies of Chinese companies: Current developments and future prospects. Asian Business & Management, 1(2), 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. S. (2002). Back-alley banking: Private entrepreneurs in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2009). World Investment Report 2009: Transnational corporations, agricultural production and development. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2004). U.S. Direct Investment Abroad. Final Results from the 1999 Benchmark Survey. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, M. (1986). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A. G. (1995). Local governments as industrial firms: An organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Hong, J., Kafouros, M., & Wright, M. (2012). Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(7), 655–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. A., & Camerer, C. F. (2003). Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Science, 49(4), 400–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, T., Clegg, J., & Ma, L. (2015). The conscious and unconscious facilitating role of the Chinese government in shaping the internationalization of Chinese MNCs. International Business Review, 24(2), 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2013). Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters, and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 265–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (1999). Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J., Ma, X., Lu, J. W., & Yiu, D. W. (2014). Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: A resource dependence logic. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1343–1363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, K. K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., Gutierrez, I., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). Privatization and entrepreneurial transformation: Emerging issues and a future research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 25, 509–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Zhou, C., & Ebbers, H. (2011). Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: Institutional perspectives and evidence. International Business Review, 20(2), 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H., & Chung, C. N. (2014). Portfolios of political ties and business group strategy in emerging economies evidence from Taiwan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 599–638.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grimm Noh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noh, G., Shin, D. The different influences of the government and politicians on the international expansion of Chinese firms. Asian Bus Manage 17, 366–396 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0044-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0044-8

Keywords

Navigation