The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 178–194 | Cite as

The Relationship Between MGNREGA and Internal Labour Migration in Tamil Nadu, India

  • Warren Dodd
  • Sara Wyngaarden
  • Sally Humphries
  • Kirit Patel
  • Shannon Majowicz
  • Matthew Little
  • Cate Dewey
Original Article

Abstract

India’s constitution contains provisions for the ‘right to work’ and the ‘right to movement’ for all citizens. Established in 2005, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is broadly considered to operationalize this ‘right to work’. At the same time, a public discourse persists that views MGNREGA as a substitute for internal labour migration. Drawing on the results from 300 household surveys in three panchayats in the Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu, we test the validity of this discourse in this setting. We find that households that rely exclusively on MGNREGA have different demographic and socioeconomic characteristics compared to households that rely exclusively on remittances from internal labour migration. Furthermore, 20 per cent of households surveyed use both MGNREGA and internal labour migration as complementary livelihood strategies. We argue that there is a need for better understanding and recognition of the complementary potential of MGNREGA and internal labour migration.

Keywords

MGNREGA internal migration human rights rural livelihoods poverty alleviation employment remittances development 

La constitution de l’Inde contient des dispositions pour le «droit au travail» et le «droit de circuler» pour tous les citoyens. Créée en 2005, la loi nationale Mahatma Gandhi de garantie de l’emploi en milieu rural (MGNREGA) est largement considérée comme rendant opérationnel ce «droit au travail» . Dans le même temps, un discours public persistant considère la loi MGNREGA comme un substitut à la migration interne de main-d’œuvre. Sur la base des résultats de 300 enquêtes auprès des ménages dans trois panchayats du district de Krishnagiri au Tamil Nadu, nous testons la validité de ce discours dans ce contexte. Nous constatons que les ménages qui dépendent exclusivement de la loi MGNREGA ont des caractéristiques démographiques et socioéconomiques différentes de celles des ménages qui dépendent exclusivement des envois de fonds provenant de la migration interne de la main-d’œuvre. En outre, 20% des ménages interrogés utilisent à la fois la loi MGNREGA et la migration interne de main-d’œuvre comme stratégies de subsistance complémentaires. Nous soutenons qu’il est nécessaire de mieux comprendre et de reconnaître le potentiel de complémentarité de la loi MGNREGA et de la migration interne de main-d’œuvre.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank DHAN Foundation and specifically the field office in Anchetty for logistical and research support. We also thank S. Shankara Gowda and T. Madhe Gowda for research and translation assistance. This project was conducted under the larger ‘Revalorizing Small Millets in Rainfed Regions of South Asia’ funded by the International Development Research Centre and the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development in Canada (now Global Affairs Canada) through the Canadian International Food Security Research Fund. The authors are thankful for the insights and support of other collaborators on the RESMISA project in India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Canada. Direct financial support for this work was provided by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship programme through the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), and an Ontario Veterinary College Doctoral Fellowship.

References

  1. Afridi, F., Mukhopadhyay, A. and Sahoo, S. (2012) Female labour force participation and child education in India: the effect of the national rural employment guarantee scheme IZA Discussion Paper No. 6593. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  2. Azam, M. (2011) The impact of Indian job guarantee scheme on labor market outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment IZA Discussion Paper No. 6548. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  3. Bakewell, O. (2008) ‘Keeping them in their place’: The ambivalent relationship between development and migration in Africa. Third World Quarterly 29(7): 1341–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu, A.K. (2013) Impact of rural employment guarantee schemes on seasonal labor markets: optimum compensation and workers’ welfare. The Journal of Economic Inequality 11(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breman, J. (1996) Footloose Labour: Working in India’s Informal Economy Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Carswell, G. (2013) Dalits and local labour markets in rural India: Experiences from the Tiruppur textile region in Tamil Nadu. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38(2): 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carswell, G. and De Neve, G. (2013) Women at the Crossroads: Implementation of Employment Guarantee Scheme in Rural Tamil Nadu. Economic & Political Weekly 48(52): 82–93.Google Scholar
  8. Carswell, G. and De Neve, G. (2014) MGNREGA in Tamil Nadu: A story of success and transformation? Journal of Agrarian Change 14(4): 564–585.Google Scholar
  9. Castles, S. (2010) Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 1565–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das, U. (2015) Can the rural employment guarantee scheme reduce rural out-migration: Evidence from West Bengal, India. The Journal of Development Studies 51(6): 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Haan, A. (1999) Livelihoods and poverty: The role of migration-a critical review of the migration literature. Journal of Development Studies 36(2): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Haan, A. (2002) Migration and livelihoods in historical perspective: A case study of Bihar, India. Journal of Development Studies 38(5): 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Haan, A. (2011) Inclusive growth? Labour migration and poverty in India. Working Paper 513. The Hague: The Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Debnath, A. and Roy, N. (2013) Linkage between internal migration and crime: Evidence from India. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 41(3): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deshingkar, P. (2005) Maximizing the Benefits of Internal Migration for Development. Paper presented at the Regional Conference on Migration and Development in Asia, Lanzhou, China.Google Scholar
  16. Deshingkar, P. (2006) Internal migration, poverty and development in Asia. ODI Briefing Paper 11. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Deshingkar, P. (2010) Migration, remote rural areas and chronic poverty in India. Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Working Paper, 323.Google Scholar
  18. Deshingkar, P. and Akter, S. (2009) Migration and human development in India Human Development Research Paper 2009/13: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  19. Deshingkar, P. and Start, D. (2003) Seasonal Migration for Livelihoods in India: Coping, Accumulation and Exclusion. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Dodd, W., Humphries, S., Patel, K., Majowicz, S. and Dewey, C. (2016) Determinants of temporary labour migration in southern India. Asian Population Studies 12(3): 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dodd, W., Humphries, S., Patel, K., Majowicz, S. and Dewey, C. (2017) The internal migration-development nexus: Evidence from southern India. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 26(1): 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M. and van de Walle, D. (2012) Does India’s employment guarantee scheme guarantee employment? Economic & Political Weekly 47(16): 55–64.Google Scholar
  23. Dutta, P., Murgai, R., Ravallion, M. and Van de Walle, D. (2014) Right to Work?: Assessing India’s employment guarantee scheme in Bihar. Washington D.C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellis, F. (2000) The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics 51(2): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haberfeld, Y., Menaria, R., Sahoo, B.B. and Vyas, R. (1999) Seasonal migration of rural labor in India. Population Research and Policy Review 18(5): 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagen-Zanker, J. and Himmelstine, C.L. (2013) What do we know about the impact of social protection programmes on the decision to migrate? Migration and Development 2(1): 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Imbert, C. and Papp, J. (2014) Short-term Migration and Rural Workfare Programs: Evidence from India Job Market Paper.Google Scholar
  28. Jacob, N. (2008) The impact of NREGA on rural–urban migration: Field survey of Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. Centre for Civil Society, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  29. Jakimow, T. (2014) ‘Breaking the backbone of farmers’: Contestations in a rural employment guarantee scheme. Journal of Peasant Studies 41(2): 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keshri, K. and Bhagat, R.B. (2010) Temporary and seasonal migration in India. Genus 66(3): 25–45.Google Scholar
  31. Keshri, K. and Bhagat, R.B. (2013) Socioeconomic determinants of temporary labour migration in India: A regional analysis. Asian Population Studies 9(2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klonner, S. and Oldiges, C. (2014) Safety Net for India’s Poor or Waste of Public Funds? Poverty and Welfare in the Wake of the World’s Largest Job Guarantee Program Discussion Paper Series No. 564: University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  33. Liu, Y. and Barrett, C.B. (2012) Heterogeneous pro-poor targeting in India’s Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme. Economic & Political Weekly 48(10): 46–53.Google Scholar
  34. Liu, Y. and Deininger, K. (2010) Poverty Impacts of India’s National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme: Evidence from Andhra Pradesh. Paper presented at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  35. Marius-Gnanou, K. (2008) Debt bondage, seasonal migration and alternative issues: Lessons from Tamil Nadu (India). Autrepart 46(2): 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry of Law and Justice. (2005) The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Law and Justice. (2007) The Constitution of India: Government of India.Google Scholar
  38. Ministry of Rural Development. (2014) NREGA at a Glance. Government of India. Retrieved February 1, 2015, from http://mnregaweb4.nic.in/netnrega/all_lvl_details_dashboard_new.aspx.
  39. Muralidharan, K., Niehaus, P. and Sukhtankar, S. (2016) General Equilibrium Effects of (Improving) Public Employment Programs: Experimental Evidence from India. San Diego, California: University of California San Diego.Google Scholar
  40. Narayanan, S. and Das, U. (2014) Women participation and rationing in the Employment Guarantee Scheme. Economic and Political Weekly 49(46): 46–53.Google Scholar
  41. Pankaj, A. and Tankha, R. (2010) Empowerment effects of the NREGS on women workers: a study in four states. Economic and Political Weekly 45(30): 45–55.Google Scholar
  42. Patel, K., Gartaula, H., Johnson, D. and Karthikeyan, M. (2015) The interplay between household food security and wellbeing among small-scale farmers in the context of rapid agrarian change in India. Agriculture & Food Security 4(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ravi, S. and Engler, M. (2015) Workfare as an effective way to fight poverty: the case of India’s NREGS. World Development 67: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reddy, D.N., Tankha, R., Upendranadh, C. and Sharma, A.N. (2010) National rural employment guarantee as social protection. IDS Bulletin 41(4): 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogaly, B. (2003) Who goes? Who stays back? Seasonal migration and staying put among rural manual workers in Eastern India. Journal of International Development 15(5): 623–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shah, A. (2006) The labour of love: Seasonal migration from Jharkhand to the brick kilns of other states in India. Contributions to Indian Sociology 40(1): 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shah, A. (2010) Land degradation and migration in a dry land region in India: Extent, nature and determinants. Environment and Development Economics 15(02): 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shankar, S., Gaiha, R. and Jha, R. (2011) Information, access and targeting: The national rural employment guarantee scheme in India. Oxford Development Studies 39(01): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Solinski, T. (2012) NREGA and labour migration in India: Is village life what the ‘rural’ poor want? The South Asianist 1(1): 17–30.Google Scholar
  50. Special Correspondent. (2016) MGNREGA leads to decline in migration. The Hindu. April 26, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/mgnrega-leads-to-decline-in-migration/article8521640.ece.
  51. Srinivasan, V. (2010) Understanding Public Services in Tamil Nadu: An Institutional Perspective. (Doctor of Philosophy), Syracuse University, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  52. Staff Reporter. (2015) Prevent labour migration, officials told. The Hindu. March 18, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/prevent-labour-migration-officials-told/article7005015.ece.
  53. Tacoli, C. and Mabala, R. (2010) Exploring mobility and migration in the context of rural—urban linkages: why gender and generation matter. Environment and Urbanization 22(2): 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tacoli, C., McGranahan, G. and Satterthwaite, D. (2008) Urbanization, poverty and inequity: Is rural-urban migration a poverty problem or part of the solution. The New Global Frontier: Urbanization, Poverty and Environment in the 21st Century, pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
  55. Tacoli, C., McGranahan, G. and Satterthwaite, D. (2015) Urbanisation, Rural–Urban Migration and Urban Poverty. London: IIED.Google Scholar
  56. UNESCO/UNICEF. (2013) Social Inclusion of Internal Migrants in India. New Delhi: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren Dodd
    • 1
  • Sara Wyngaarden
    • 1
  • Sally Humphries
    • 2
  • Kirit Patel
    • 3
  • Shannon Majowicz
    • 4
  • Matthew Little
    • 1
  • Cate Dewey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Population MedicineUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  3. 3.International Development Studies ProgramMenno Simons College affiliated with the University of Winnipeg and Canadian Mennonite UniversityWinnipegCanada
  4. 4.School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations