Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 235–251 | Cite as

The Contested Relationship Between Paid Work and Women’s Empowerment: Empirical Analysis from Bangladesh

  • Naila Kabeer
  • Simeen Mahmud
  • Sakiba Tasneem
Original Article

Abstract

The debate about the empowerment potential of women’s access to labour market opportunities is a long-standing one but it has taken on fresh lease of life with the increased feminization of paid work in the context of economic liberalization. Contradictory viewpoints reflect differences in how empowerment itself is understood as well as variations in the cultural meanings and social acceptability of different kinds of paid work. Research on this issue in the Bangladesh context has not been able to address these questions because it tends to use very restricted definitions of work and narrow conceptualizations of empowerment. This paper uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative data from Bangladesh to explore this debate, distinguishing between different categories of work and using measures of women’s empowerment which have been explicitly designed to capture the specificities of local patriarchal constraints.

Keywords

gender South Asia intra-household relations paid work economic empowerment 

Le débat sur le potentiel d’autonomisation de l’accès des femmes aux opportunités du marché du travail est ancien, mais il connaît un regain de vie grâce à la féminisation croissante du travail rémunéré dans le contexte de la libéralisation économique et grâce à l’intérêt croissant de la communauté de l’aide au développement international. Les points de vue contradictoires reflètent des différences dans la façon dont l’autonomisation elle-même est comprise ainsi que des variations dans les significations culturelles et l’acceptabilité sociale des différents types de travail rémunéré. La recherche sur cette question dans le contexte du Bangladesh n’a pas permis de régler ces questions, car les définitions du travail ont tendance à être très restrictives et les concepts de l’autonomisation, très étriqués. Cet article utilise une combinaison de données quantitatives et qualitatives du Bangladesh pour explorer ce débat en distinguant différentes catégories de travail et en utilisant des indicateurs d’autonomisation des femmes qui ont été explicitement conçus pour saisir les spécificités des contraintes patriarcales locales.

Notes

Supplementary material

41287_2017_119_MOESM1_ESM.doc (312 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 312 kb)

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1994) A Field of One’s Own. Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adnan, S. (1993) Birds in a cage: Institutional change and women’s position in Bangladesh. In: N. Federici, K.O. Mason and S. Sogner (eds.) Women’s Position and Demographic Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, S. and Eswaran, M. (2009) What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics 90: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cain, M., Khanam, S.R. and Nahar, S. (1979) Class, patriarchy and women’s work in Bangladesh. Population and Development Review 5(3): 405–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J.R. and J. Holland (eds.) (2005) Methods in Development Research: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: ITDG Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Golla, A., Malhotra, A., Nanda, P. and Mehra, R. (2011) Understanding and Measuring Women’s Economic Empowerment. Definition, Framework, Indicators. Washington, DC: International Centre for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  7. Government of Bangladesh. (2011) Labour Force Survey 2010. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Hashemi, S., Schuler, R.S. and Riley, I. (1996) Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development 24(4): 635–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heath, R. (2014) Women’s access to labour market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence: Evidence from Bangladesh’. World Development 57: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jejheebhoy, S. (1995) Women’s Education, Autonomy, and Reproductive Behaviour. Experience from Developing Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, R. and Oster, E. (2009) The power of TV: cable television and women’s status in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3): 1057–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kabeer, N. (2001) Ideas, economics and the ‘sociology of supply’: explanations for fertility decline in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies 38(1): 29–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabeer, N. (2008) Paid Work, Women’s Empowerment and Gender Justice: Critical Pathways of Social Change. Pathways Working Paper 3. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Kabeer, N., Mahmud, S. and Haq L. (2014) Diverging stories of “missing women” in South Asia: Is son preference weakening in Bangladesh? Feminist Economics 20(4): 138–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahmud, S. and Tasneem, S. (2011) The Under-Reporting of Women’s Economic Activity in Bangladesh: An Examination of Official Statistics. BDI Working Paper 1. Dhaka: BRAC Development Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Mahmud, S. and Mahmud, W. (1991) Women and Structural Adjustment: The case of Bangladesh. Commonwealth Economic Papers Number 22. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  17. McCarthy, F. and Feldman, S. (1984) Rural Women and Development in Bangladesh: Selected Issues. Dhaka: NORAD.Google Scholar
  18. Osmani, S.R., Mahmud, W., Sen, B., Dagdeviran, H. and Seth, A. (2003) The Macroeconomics of Poverty Reduction: The Case Study of Bangladesh. Dhaka: UNDP.Google Scholar
  19. Rozario, S. (2006) The new burqa in Bangladesh: Empowerment or violation of women’s rights?’ Women’s Studies International Forum 29(4): 368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Salway, S., Jesmin, S. and Rahman, S. (2005) Women’s employment in urban Bangladesh: A challenge to gender identity? Development and Change 36(2): 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sen, A.K. (1990) Gender and co-operative conflicts. In: I. Tinker (ed.) Persistent Inequalities. Women and World Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. World Bank. (2008) Whispers to Voices. Gender and Social Transformation in Bangladesh. Dhaka: World Bank/AusAID.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.BRAC Institute of Governance and DevelopmentDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.BRAC Research and Evaluation DivisionBRAC CentreDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations